Literature DB >> 28612325

Stages of Change for Mammography Among Mexican Women and a Decisional Balance Comparison Across Countries.

Ana María Salinas-Martínez1,2, David Emmanuel Castañeda-Vásquez3, Norma Guadalupe García-Morales3, Norma Edith Oliva-Sosa4, Laura Hermila de-la-Garza-Salinas5, Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha3, José Manuel Ramírez-Aranda6.   

Abstract

An analysis of the adoption of secondary preventive behaviors is significant in regions with disparities in mammography use and breast cancer survival. Therefore, we determined the cognitive factors and the degree to which they differentiate stages of change in mammography among Mexican women. We also compared the decisional balance performance at Mexico, Switzerland, South Korea, and the USA. A cross-sectional study was designed for women in the stages of precontemplation (n = 240), contemplation (n = 243), action (n = 205), maintenance (n = 311), and relapse (n = 348). We only considered those ≥40 years with no cancer history. We measured the pros, cons, and self-efficacy, among other components. The decisional balance was estimated, and the result was transformed into T-scores. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with multinomial logistic regression using precontemplation as the reference group. The decisional balance distinguished stages partially: in contemplation, the OR was 1.26 (95%CI 1.08, 1.47) and in maintenance, 1.34 (95%CI 1.13, 1.59); in action and relapse, the statistical significance was marginal (p < 0.10). The decisional balance T-score performance registered variations among countries. Additionally, the effect of self-efficacy progressively ascended from contemplation to action and maintenance (OR = 1.29 [95%CI 1.05, 1.58], 1.53 [95%CI 1.20, 1.96], and 2.48 [95%CI 1.82, 3.39], respectively). Furthermore, risk perception and severity did not have an effect on stages of change among Mexican women. Recognition of what provokes action in a population is a key factor in the efficacy of screening programs. Variations among countries highlight the necessity for importance of investigating cognitive determinants for mammography in specific areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Mammography; Stages of change; Transtheoretical model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28612325     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1236-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  27 in total

1.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; C E Dube; B H Marcus; J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; M R Andersen; A M Stoddard; N Urban; B K Rimer; D S Lane; S A Fox; M E Costanza
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Effects of a tailored web-based educational intervention on women's perceptions of and intentions to obtain mammography.

Authors:  Zu-Chun Lin; Judith A Effken
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.036

4.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

5.  A framework for the study of access to medical care.

Authors:  L A Aday; R Andersen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Victoria Champion; Patrick O Monahan; Joanne Daggy; Siu Hui; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

7.  Differences in health and cultural beliefs by stage of mammography screening adoption in African American women.

Authors:  Kathleen M Russell; Patrick Monahan; Ann Wagle; Victoria Champion
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast cancer screening: stages of adoption among Cambodian American women.

Authors:  Shin-Ping Tu; Yutaka Yasui; Alan Kuniyuki; Stephen M Schwartz; J Carey Jackson; Vicky M Taylor
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2002

9.  Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Victoria L Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Determinants of the use of breast cancer screening among women workers in urban Mexico.

Authors:  Kristin Marie Wall; Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha; Ana María Salinas-Martínez; Sergio R Sánchez-Peña
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  3 in total

1.  Never Screened: Understanding Breast Cancer Nonadherence in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Alelí M Ayala-Marín; Vivian Colón-López; Camille Vélez-Álamo; Natalie Fernández-Espada; Angela Pattatucci; María E Fernández
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2021-03-05

2.  Inconsistent Mammography Perceptions and Practice among Women of Over 40 Years in Iran

Authors:  Fatemeh Pourhaji; Fazlollah Ghofranipour
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-05-25

3.  Evaluation of prevention behaviour and its influencing factors with respect to cancer screening.

Authors:  Adam Dawid; Christoph Borzikowsky; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Sabine Herlitzius; Hans-Jürgen Wenz; Jörg Wiltfang; Katrin Hertrampf
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.322

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.