| Literature DB >> 28612148 |
Anna Lass1, Panagiotis Karanis2, Krzysztof Korzeniewski3.
Abstract
It is estimated that faecal-orally transmitted diseases are common in Afghanistan, as a consequence of poor hygienic standards of life and widespread contamination of water and food with both human and animal faeces. However, there is little information in the literature concerning infections caused by intestinal parasites in the Afghan population. In this study, we report the occurrence of Giardia intestinalis assemblages (A and B) in formalin-fixed stool samples collected from 245 Afghan schoolchildren living in Ghazni Province in eastern Afghanistan. Detection of the parasite's DNA and genotyping was performed using real-time PCR, specific to the β-giardin gene of G. intestinalis. Positive results were recorded in 52 (21.2%) samples. Genotyping was successful in 39 faecal samples and showed the predominance of assemblage B of G. intestinalis in this population (15 assemblage A and 24 assemblage B). Co-infection with both genotypes A and B was detected in four samples. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of 10% buffered formalin fixative on the detection of G. intestinalis DNA using real-time PCR and nested PCR characterised by different lengths of PCR products (74 and 479 bp, respectively). The human faeces containing the Giardia cysts were tested for 16 weeks. Amplification of G. intestinalis DNA with real-time PCR was possible up to 6 weeks of preservation of stool sample in formalin, compared to only 2 weeks with nested PCR. This suggests that real-time PCR is a more suitable tool in cases where stool samples have to be kept in formalin for longer periods of time.Entities:
Keywords: Afghanistan; Assemblages; Children; Giardia; Nested PCR; Real-time PCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28612148 PMCID: PMC5529491 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-017-5529-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Results of detection of DNA of G. intestinalis using real-time and nested PCR in formalin-fixed stool samples containing Giardia cysts depending on the time of fixation in formalin and sample size
| Detection method | Sample size | Detection of | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Real-time PCR | 0.1 g | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 0.6 g | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | |
| Nested PCR | 0.1 g | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 0.6 g | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
Two weeks in formalin (1), 4 weeks in formalin (2), 6 weeks in formalin (3), 8 weeks in formalin (4), 10 weeks in formalin (5), 12 weeks in formalin (6), 14 weeks in formalin (7), 16 weeks in formalin (8)
+ positive result of real-time PCR, − negative result of real-time PCR
Fig. 1Detection of DNA of G. intestinalis from faeces containing Giardia cysts fixed in formalin using real-time PCR. a 0.1 g samples: Giardia-positive control (line 1), positive sample kept in formalin for 2 weeks (line 2), negative samples kept in formalin over 4 weeks (lines 3–9) and negative control (line 10). b 0.6 g samples: Giardia-positive control (line 1), positive sample kept in formalin for 2 weeks (line 2), positive sample kept in formalin for 4 weeks (line 3), positive sample kept in formalin for 6 weeks (line 4), negative samples kept in formalin over 6 weeks (lines 5–9) and negative control (line 10)
Fig. 2Detection of G. intestinalis from faeces containing Giardia cysts fixed in formalin using nested PCR. a 0.1 g samples. b 0.6 g samples: molecular weight marker (pUC19 DNA/MspI (HpaII) Marker, Thermo Scientific) (line 1), Giardia-positive control (line 2), positive sample kept in formalin for 2 weeks (line 3), negative samples kept in formalin over 4 weeks (lines 4–10) and negative control (line 11)
Detection of G. intestinalis DNA using real-time PCR in faecal samples collected from Afghan children in comparison to microscopic investigation (Korzeniewski et al. 2017)
| Template no. | Age of the children | Microscopy (Korzeniewski et al. | Real-time PCR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| A | B | |||
| 1 | nd | + | + | − | − |
| 2 | nd | + | + | + | − |
| 3 | nd | + | + | + | − |
| 4 | nd | + | − | − | − |
| 5 | nd | + | + | − | + |
| 6 | 9 | + | + | − | + |
| 7 | nd | + | + | − | + |
| 8 | 12 | − | + | − | − |
| 9 | 10 | + | + | + | − |
| 10 | 10 | − | + | − | − |
| 11 | 12 | + | + | + | − |
| 12 | 10 | + | + | − | − |
| 13 | nd | + | + | + | − |
| 14 | nd | − | + | + | − |
| 15 | nd | + | + | − | + |
| 16 | nd | + | + | − | + |
| 17 | nd | + | + | + | + |
| 18 | nd | + | + | + | − |
| 19 | nd | + | + | + | − |
| 20 | nd | + | + | + | + |
| 21 | nd | + | + | − | + |
| 22 | 9 | + | + | − | + |
| 23 | nd | + | + | − | + |
| 24 | nd | + | + | + | + |
| 25 | nd | − | + | − | + |
| 26 | 10 | − | + | − | − |
| 27 | 10 | + | + | − | − |
| 28 | 9 | + | + | + | − |
| 29 | 8 | + | − | − | − |
| 30 | 10 | − | + | − | − |
| 31 | 8 | + | + | − | + |
| 32 | 10 | + | + | + | + |
| 33 | 8 | + | + | − | − |
| 34 | 8 | − | + | − | − |
| 35 | 10 | + | − | − | − |
| 36 | 10 | + | + | − | + |
| 37 | 11 | + | + | − | − |
| 38 | 10 | + | − | − | − |
| 39 | 11 | + | + | − | − |
| 40 | 5 | + | + | − | − |
| 41 | 18 | + | + | − | + |
| 42 | 12 | + | + | − | + |
| 43 | 10 | + | − | − | − |
| 44 | 12 | − | − | − | − |
| 45 | 11 | − | + | − | − |
| 46 | 10 | + | + | − | − |
| 47 | 10 | + | + | − | + |
| 48 | 8 | − | + | − | − |
| 49 | 10 | + | − | − | − |
| 50 | 12 | + | + | − | + |
| 51 | 10 | − | + | − | + |
| 52 | 9 | + | + | − | + |
| 53 | 18 | − | + | − | − |
| 54 | 11 | + | + | − | + |
| 55 | nd | − | + | − | + |
| 56 | 13 | − | + | + | − |
| 57 | 15 | − | + | − | + |
| 58 | 16 | + | + | − | − |
| 59 | 19 | + | + | + | − |
nd not determined, + positive results, − negative result, A assemblage A, B assemblage B
Fig. 3Results of detection of G. intestinalis DNA in faecal samples collected from Afghan children using real-time PCR; real-time PCR performed for first 94 templates investigated in this study. Giardia-positive control (line 1), positive samples (template nos. 1–3, 5–15; Table 2) (lines 2–15), negative samples (line 16) and negative control (line 17)