| Literature DB >> 28611857 |
Firat Ozan1, Fatih Dogar2, Kaan Gurbuz1, Yakup Ekinci1, Semmi Koyuncu3, Hazim Sekban1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical and functional outcomes of chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction via the Lindholm technique and via the Vulpius' lengthening of the gastrocnemius.Entities:
Keywords: Achilles tendon rupture; Chronic rupture; Lindholm technique; Vulpius technique
Year: 2017 PMID: 28611857 PMCID: PMC5458654 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr2943w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med Res ISSN: 1918-3003
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the Lindholm technique (a, b) and primary repair with Vulpius’ lengthening of the gastrocnemius (c, d).
Patient Characteristics
| Patients | Sex | Age | Side | Gap (cm) | Cause of injury | Time between injury and surgery (day) | Follow-up (months) | Immobilized (week) | Surgical technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 28 | L | 6 | Football | 40 | 12 | 3 | Primary repair + Vulpius |
| 2 | M | 39 | R | 3 | Football | 30 | 18 | 4 | Primary repair + Vulpius |
| 3 | M | 38 | R | 4 | Football | 30 | 14 | 5 | Primary repair + Vulpius |
| 4 | M | 28 | R | 4 | Football | 45 | 15 | 5 | Primary repair + Vulpius |
| 5 | M | 42 | L | 3 | Football | 35 | 21 | 5 | Primary repair + Vulpius |
| 6 | F | 36 | R | 4 | Fall | 50 | 24 | 4 | Primary repair + Vulpius |
| 7 | M | 39 | L | 3 | Football | 35 | 20 | 4 | Primary repair + Vulpius |
| 8 | M | 32 | L | 4 | Football | 60 | 24 | 3 | Lindholm |
| 9 | M | 39 | R | 4 | Football | 45 | 18 | 5 | Lindholm |
| 10 | M | 41 | R | 4 | Football | 60 | 17 | 5 | Lindholm |
| 11 | M | 32 | R | 5 | Fall | 60 | 13 | 6 | Lindholm |
| 12 | M | 40 | R | 3 | Football | 45 | 12 | 3 | Lindholm |
| 13 | M | 34 | R | 5 | Football | 30 | 24 | 4 | Lindholm |
| 14 | F | 22 | L | 4 | Fall | 30 | 24 | 3 | Lindholm |
| 15 | M | 38 | R | 4 | Football | 35 | 38 | 3 | Lindholm |
Figure 2Intraoperative view of the Lindholm technique application. (a) Reconstruction of Achilles rupture defect with medial and lateral flaps harvested from the gastrocnemius. (b) Final view of the reconstruction after augmentation of the plantaris longus tendon.
Figure 3Intraoperative view of the Vulpius technique application. (a) The view of the gap at the chronically ruptured Achilles tendon. (b) The final view of the primary repair of the defect after lengthening of the gastrocnemius via a reverse V shape.
The Hooker Assessment Scale
| Excellent | Satisfactory | Poor |
|---|---|---|
| None of patients had symptoms | Patients were free from symptoms but there was weakness of the calf detected or excessive passive dorsiflexion of the ankle. | In addition to the findings of satisfactory, the patients experienced symptoms either of weakness of the ankle or foot or of a limp or pain. |
Clinical Outcomes of Patients
| Patients | Returned to pre-injury daily activities (months) | Stand on tiptoe | Plantar flexion (°) | Dorsiflexion (°) | Calf atrophy (cm) | Satisfaction (Hooker classification) | Complication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Normal | 40 | 15 | 0 | Excellent | No |
| 2 | 2 | Normal | 45 | 20 | 0 | Excellent | No |
| 3 | 2 | Normal | 32 | 25 | 2 | Excellent | No |
| 4 | 5 | Normal | 35 | 24 | 2 | Excellent | No |
| 5 | 5 | Normal | 28 | 25 | 2.5 | Excellent | No |
| 6 | 4 | Normal | 30 | 15 | 1 | Satisfactory | No |
| 7 | 4 | Normal | 35 | 20 | 0 | Excellent | No |
| 8 | 3 | Normal | 40 | 20 | 0 | Excellent | No |
| 9 | 3 | Normal | 40 | 20 | 1 | Excellent | No |
| 10 | 3.5 | Normal | 40 | 15 | 2 | Excellent | No |
| 11 | 3.5 | Normal | 35 | 15 | 2 | Satisfactory | No |
| 12 | 4 | Normal | 40 | 15 | 2 | Satisfactory | No |
| 13 | 3 | Normal | 40 | 15 | 1 | Excellent | No |
| 14 | 2 | Normal | 45 | 20 | 1 | Satisfactory | No |
| 15 | 3 | Normal | 40 | 15 | 2 | Excellent | No |