Literature DB >> 28611857

Chronic Achilles Tendon Rupture Reconstruction Using the Lindholm Method and the Vulpius Method.

Firat Ozan1, Fatih Dogar2, Kaan Gurbuz1, Yakup Ekinci1, Semmi Koyuncu3, Hazim Sekban1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical and functional outcomes of chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction via the Lindholm technique and via the Vulpius' lengthening of the gastrocnemius.
METHODS: We evaluated 15 patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture (Lindholm technique in eight patients and primary repair with the Vulpius technique in seven patients). In the final follow-up, the Hooker scale was used to measure the ankle functional capacity in all patients. The patients were evaluated on the basis of their capability to stand on tiptoe on the affected limb and the time required to return to pre-injury daily activities.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 19.6 months (range, 12 - 38 months). The mean time to return to work and daily activity was 3.2 months. The mean calf atrophy at the end of follow-up was 1.2 cm (range, 0 - 2.5 cm). At the last follow-up visit, no patient had any limitation in the activities of daily living and the active and passive ankle range of motion was good. All patients were able to perform single-leg heel rises at the end of follow-up and the Hooker scores were excellent for 11 patients and satisfactory for four patients.
CONCLUSION: The reconstruction of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures via the Lindholm technique or via the Vulpius technique is associated with good clinical and functional outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achilles tendon rupture; Chronic rupture; Lindholm technique; Vulpius technique

Year:  2017        PMID: 28611857      PMCID: PMC5458654          DOI: 10.14740/jocmr2943w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1918-3003


Introduction

The Achilles tendon is one of the most commonly ruptured tendons in the body, typically affecting patients between 35 and 60 years old [1-3]. Achilles tendon ruptures usually are more common in men than in women and occur mostly during sports activities [1-4]. Patients typically experience sudden sharp pain and/or a feeling of shot pain behind the leg at injury [1, 4]. Although clinical examination is sufficient to diagnose Achilles tendon rupture after injury, approximately 10-25% of complete acute ruptures are missed initially and diagnosed later [2, 5, 6]. The optimal treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture is surgical repair [5, 6] and various techniques have been described [3, 6, 7]. It is difficult to treat a chronically ruptured Achilles tendon because there usually is a gap between the ends of the tendon, scarring, retraction of calf muscles and loss of contractility of the triceps surae [3, 5, 8]. These problems make the treatment of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures different from that of acute ruptures [5, 8, 9]. Operative techniques to repair chronic Achilles ruptures include primary repair and augmentation with fascia advancement, tendon transfer, free tissue transfer, synthetic grafts or allografts [2, 3, 5-8, 10, 11]. Some techniques have been combined, such as primary repair and Vulpius’ lengthening of the gastrocnemius [3, 6]. The Lindholm method is a technique in which double flaps from the gastrocnemius aponeurosis are used for the Achilles reconstruction [12]. We investigated the clinical and functional outcomes of chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction via the Lindholm technique and primary repair via the Vulpius’ lengthening of the gastrocnemius.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 15 patients (13 males, two females; 10 right, five left; mean age, 35.2 years; range, 22 - 42 years) who underwent two different surgical techniques (Lindholm technique in eight and primary repair with Vulpius technique in seven) for chronic Achilles tendon rupture repair between 2010 and 2015 (Fig. 1). The characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1.
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of the Lindholm technique (a, b) and primary repair with Vulpius’ lengthening of the gastrocnemius (c, d).

Table 1

Patient Characteristics

PatientsSexAgeSideGap (cm)Cause of injuryTime between injury and surgery (day)Follow-up (months)Immobilized (week)Surgical technique
1M28L6Football40123Primary repair + Vulpius
2M39R3Football30184Primary repair + Vulpius
3M38R4Football30145Primary repair + Vulpius
4M28R4Football45155Primary repair + Vulpius
5M42L3Football35215Primary repair + Vulpius
6F36R4Fall50244Primary repair + Vulpius
7M39L3Football35204Primary repair + Vulpius
8M32L4Football60243Lindholm
9M39R4Football45185Lindholm
10M41R4Football60175Lindholm
11M32R5Fall60136Lindholm
12M40R3Football45123Lindholm
13M34R5Football30244Lindholm
14F22L4Fall30243Lindholm
15M38R4Football35383Lindholm
Schematic illustration of the Lindholm technique (a, b) and primary repair with Vulpius’ lengthening of the gastrocnemius (c, d). For all the patients, at least 4 weeks had passed since the primary injury. All patients were diagnosed by physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The chief complaints included significant disability and weakness in performing activities of daily living and limping. On physical examination, there was a gap at the site of the ruptured tendon and the calf squeeze test was positive in all patients. None of them could stand on tiptoe.

Surgical technique

The surgical procedure was performed with the patient prone under spinal or general anesthesia. Initially, a longitudinal posterior midline incision was made. The Achilles tendon was exposed and the ruptured ends are debrided. Then, the length of the tendon defect was measured with the ankle plantarflexed up to 20°, and surgical reconstruction methods were performed. In the Lindholm technique, the transfer of the two split fascia from the sides of the gastrocnemius coupled with the suturing of the ruptured area after a 180° turn was performed (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Intraoperative view of the Lindholm technique application. (a) Reconstruction of Achilles rupture defect with medial and lateral flaps harvested from the gastrocnemius. (b) Final view of the reconstruction after augmentation of the plantaris longus tendon.

Intraoperative view of the Lindholm technique application. (a) Reconstruction of Achilles rupture defect with medial and lateral flaps harvested from the gastrocnemius. (b) Final view of the reconstruction after augmentation of the plantaris longus tendon. In the Vulpius technique, a “V” incision was performed in the proximal gastrocnemius with its apex proximal. The arms of the “V” were approximately 10 cm in length or about one and half times the length of the defect, to allow for sufficient lengthening. Next, the proximal stump of the Achilles tendon was pulled distally until it can bridge the gap with the foot held in plantar flexion. Then, anastomosis was sutured with non-absorbable material by the modified Kessler method (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Intraoperative view of the Vulpius technique application. (a) The view of the gap at the chronically ruptured Achilles tendon. (b) The final view of the primary repair of the defect after lengthening of the gastrocnemius via a reverse V shape.

Intraoperative view of the Vulpius technique application. (a) The view of the gap at the chronically ruptured Achilles tendon. (b) The final view of the primary repair of the defect after lengthening of the gastrocnemius via a reverse V shape. Postoperatively, a short-leg splint was applied to the ankle joint with the plantarflexion at 20°. The cast was generally applied for 4 weeks, but it was used for up to 6 weeks in patients where the state of the remaining tendons was poor. Then, the patients were allowed to bear weight as tolerated after removed the cast and physical therapy was initiated. Active joint exercises were started, and other muscle-strengthening exercises, such as cycling, passive joint exercise, stretching and heel rises, were gradually performed as comfort allowed. In the final follow-up, the Hooker scale [13] (Table 2) was used to measure the ankle functional capacity in all patients. Ankle range of motion (plantar flexion and dorsiflexion) was measured using a goniometer. The patients were investigated regarding their capability to stand on tiptoe on the affected limb and the time required to return to pre-injury daily activities. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board, and all patients provided informed consent.
Table 2

The Hooker Assessment Scale

ExcellentSatisfactoryPoor
None of patients had symptomsPatients were free from symptoms but there was weakness of the calf detected or excessive passive dorsiflexion of the ankle.In addition to the findings of satisfactory, the patients experienced symptoms either of weakness of the ankle or foot or of a limp or pain.

Results

The clinical and functional outcomes of the patients are presented in Table 3. The mean follow-up was 19.6 months (range, 12 - 38 months), the mean interval between injury and surgical reconstruction was 42 days (range, 30 - 60 days) and the mean ruptured gap was 4 cm (range, 3 - 6 cm). The mean calf atrophy was 1.2 cm (range, 0 - 2.5 cm) at the end of follow-up. The mean time for patients to return to daily activity was 3.2 months (range, 2 - 5 months).
Table 3

Clinical Outcomes of Patients

PatientsReturned to pre-injury daily activities (months)Stand on tiptoePlantar flexion (°)Dorsiflexion (°)Calf atrophy (cm)Satisfaction (Hooker classification)Complication
12Normal40150ExcellentNo
22Normal45200ExcellentNo
32Normal32252ExcellentNo
45Normal35242ExcellentNo
55Normal28252.5ExcellentNo
64Normal30151SatisfactoryNo
74Normal35200ExcellentNo
83Normal40200ExcellentNo
93Normal40201ExcellentNo
103.5Normal40152ExcellentNo
113.5Normal35152SatisfactoryNo
124Normal40152SatisfactoryNo
133Normal40151ExcellentNo
142Normal45201SatisfactoryNo
153Normal40152ExcellentNo
No patient had any limitation in the activities of daily living. The active and passive ankle range of motion was good. No patient could perform affected-side heel rise preoperatively, but all patients were able to do so at the end of follow-up. The Hooker scores were excellent for 11 patients and satisfactory for four patients. All tendons healed without complications. No infections, nerve injuries, or re-ruptures occurred inter- or postoperatively.

Discussion

In our study, at a midterm follow-up (mean, 19 months), reconstruction of the chronic Achilles tendon ruptures via the Lindholm technique and primary repair with Vulpius’ method provided tendon healing and good clinical and functional outcomes. All of our patients had returned to their pre-injury daily activity level in 3 months. There was no functional deficit and the results were satisfactory in all patients. Many surgical procedures have been described for reconstruction of the chronic Achilles tendon rupture, each with some advantages and disadvantages [2, 3, 5-8, 10]. In addition, despite many repair techniques having been described, there is no evidence-based guideline for deciding on the type of operative management for neglected Achilles ruptures [14, 15]. The gap between the tendon ends could not be closed with proper tension in the chronic Achilles tendon rupture. This can be achieved only by interposition of the gastrocnemius fascia with a central flap or double (medial and lateral) flaps in between the tendon ends [12, 16]. In addition, the plantaris longus tendon could be used as a supportive membrane. In all of our cases, the plantaris longus tendon was augmented to the tear area of the Achilles tendon. In the Lindholm [12] surgical technique, two flaps harvested from the gastrocnemius facia and flat surfaces facing the skin are used by turning them 180° and, thus, preventing tendon adhesions. Hosey et al [17] reported satisfactory results using a modified Lindholm technique; however, none of their patients returned to their full preoperative athletic capabilities. In other techniques, semitendinosus, flexor hallucis longus, tibialis posterior and peroneus brevis tendons have been used as free or pediculated transposition flaps [2, 5, 6, 18, 19]. Wapner et al [19] reported good functional results after the dynamic repair of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures with flexor hallucis longus tendons. Simultaneously, good clinical results have been reported in chronic Achilles tendon ruptures reconstructed with synthetic materials and Achilles tendon allografts; however, these studies are limited in the literature [6, 8, 11, 18]. Although using Achilles allografts to reconstruct the chronic Achilles tendon ruptures provides surgical flexibility and convenience, the disadvantages may include rejection of the allograft, spread of infectious diseases and deep infection [6, 8, 11, 18]. Reconstruction of the chronically ruptured Achilles tendon may have some complications [5], such as adhesions, wound breakdown and infection [2, 5, 10]. Tendon adhesions are encountered more frequently in patients who had conservative treatment than in those who underwent reconstructive surgery, and a 2.6-45% complication rate has been reported [20]. In our study, we did not encounter any major complication (deep vein thrombosis, re-rupture and deep infections) or minor complication (hematoma and superficial wound infection). Our study was limited by the small patient population because chronic Achilles tendon rupture is rare. In addition, we did not evaluate the strength of the plantar flexion of the affected foot compared to the normal side. Another limitation of our study is that surgical procedures were performed by multiple surgeons. In conclusion, based on the findings of the current study, we recommend reconstruction of the chronic Achilles tendon ruptures via the Lindholm technique or primary repair with the Vulpius technique. Both are associated with good clinical and functional outcomes.
  18 in total

1.  A new method of operation in subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  A LINDHOLM
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1959-07-30

2.  Reconstruction of neglected Achilles' tendon defect with peroneus brevis tendon allograft: a case report.

Authors:  Yavuz Kocabey; John Nyland; Akbar Nawab; David Caborn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 3.  Neglected ruptures of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Hamish D H Leslie; W H B Edwards
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.653

4.  Reconstruction for neglected Achilles tendon rupture: the modified Bosworth technique.

Authors:  Yih-Shiunn Lee; Chien-Chung Lin; Cheng-Nan Chen; Shih-Hao Chen; Wen-Yun Liao; Chien-Rae Huang
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  Medial Achilles tendon island flap--a novel technique to treat reruptures and neglected ruptures of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Lasse J Lapidus; Bill Adams Ray; Per Hamberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction using a free semitendinosus tendon graft transfer.

Authors:  Mohammad Mahdi Sarzaeem; Mohammad Mahdi Bagherian Lemraski; Farshad Safdari
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Chronic rupture of tendo Achillis. Long-term results of operative management using polyester tape.

Authors:  A G Jennings; G K Sefton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

8.  A retrospective study on surgical repair of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  T Hosey; S Wertheimer
Journal:  J Foot Surg       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  Surgical management of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon remains unclear: a systematic review of the management options.

Authors:  Mohammed Hadi; Jonathan Young; Lisa Cooper; Matthew Costa; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 10.  Management of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Adam Ajis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Less invasive turn-down flap tendinoplasty in chronic Achilles tendon rupture].

Authors:  Michael H Amlang; Thomas Mittlmeier; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 2.  Management of chronic Achilles ruptures: a scoping review.

Authors:  Zaki Arshad; Edward Jun Shing Lau; Shu Hui Leow; Maneesh Bhatia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.