Literature DB >> 28611557

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of Synchronous Adenocarcinomas of the Distal Rectum.

Gianluca Andrisani1, Margherita Pizzicannella1, Francesco Maria Di Matteo1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with an innovative full-thickness resection device (FTRD; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) allows a safe and complete full-thickness resection of early colorectal cancer. We present the first case of two EFTR performed at the same time to treat synchronous rectal adenocarcinomas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma relapse; Colorectal cancer; Full-thickness resection

Year:  2017        PMID: 28611557      PMCID: PMC5465755          DOI: 10.1159/000455941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1662-0631


Introduction

Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are the two endoscopic options currently recommended for the treatment of early colorectal cancer [1, 2, 3, 4]. Nowadays, ESD is considered the procedure of choice, as an alternative to surgery, in case of non-lifting sign adenomas or recurrent/residual adenomas on scars [5, 6, 7]. However, ESD requires good technical expertise with a long learning curve and a longer procedure time than other endoscopic techniques. Furthermore, colon ESD could be technically challenging in case of recurrent adenomas or non-lifting lesions, because of the presence of submucosal fibrosis, with a higher rate of complications (i.e., perforations) and incomplete en bloc resection [6, 7, 8, 9]. Recently, a new endoscopic full-thickness resection device (FTRD; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) has been developed to achieve a safe and complete endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer (Fig. 1) [10, 11].
Fig. 1

The full-thickness resection device (FTRD; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany). a A modified 14-mm over-the-scope clip (OTSC) is mounted onto a cap. b The FTRD assembled on a colonoscope.

Case Report

A 55-year-old male was referred to our hospital for endoscopic resection of two synchronous lesions of the distal rectum. On endoscopy, at 5 cm above the dentate line, we observed a 20-mm local recurrent adenoma on the scar of a previous endoscopic mucosal resection of a laterally spreading tumor (pseudo-depressed type) with high-grade dysplasia and a 25-mm laterally spreading tumor (mixed type), with no lifting sign, previously biopsied with histology positive for adenocarcinoma in situ (Fig. 2). Rectal endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging showed no lymphatic or metastatic disease of both lesions. Because of the lesions’ characteristics and histology, we used the FTRD to achieve simultaneous R0 resections during the same colonoscopy. The lateral margins of the lesions were marked respectively with argon plasma coagulation. The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) device was mounted on the tip of the colonoscope (CFQ-145I Olympus). The first target lesion was grasped and pulled into the cap by the grasping forceps. Then, another FTRD was mounted on the tip of the colonoscope (CFQ-145I Olympus) and a second endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) was performed (Fig. 3). The total procedure time was less than 30 min. No complications occurred, and after 24 h the patient was discharged. Histology of the non-lifting sign lesion showed adenocarcinoma with submucosa infiltration (sm1 sec. Kikuchi), no lymphovascular invasion, and a negative muscular layer. Histology of the local recurrent adenoma on the scar revealed a carcinoma in situ. The endoscopic follow-up after 3 months showed spontaneous OTSC dislocation with normal scars, negative for adenoma relapse.
Fig. 2

Endoscopic images. a Local residual adenoma on the scar after incomplete endoscopic piecemeal mucosectomy in the rectum. b Laterally spreading tumor with no lifting sign, previously biopsied with histology positive for adenocarcinoma in situ. c, d Lesions marked with argon plasma coagulation.

Fig. 3

Endoscopic images showing the target lesion that is grasped and pulled into the cap by the grasping forceps (a); the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) completely closing the full-thickness resection site (b); the rectal full-wall resection specimen (c); the serosal surface macroscopically visible on the specimen (d); two over-the-scope clips (OTSC) completely closing the full-thickness resection site (e); and the rectal full-wall resection specimen (f).

Discussion

Despite recent improvements in endoscopic therapeutic technology, safety strategies, and procedures, the endoscopic resection of recurrent adenomas with no lifting sign, scars of R1 resection, and non-lifting lesions represents a major challenge especially in Western countries. ESD is considered the best approach, as an alternative to surgery, in the management of these lesions [5, 6, 7]. However, the high risk of perforation, ever more increased in case of fibrosis, the long procedure time, and the high level of skill required in order to be performed safely are still a major barrier for the spread of colorectal ESD among Western endoscopists [8, 9]. In the last years, the possibility to obtain an EFTR has aroused great interest among the scientific community. Recently, the FTRD has been developed [10, 11]. It consists of a 23-mm cap carrying a modified 14-mm OTSC. A 13-mm monofilament snare is preloaded in the tip of the cap. The handle of the snare runs on the outer surface of the scope underneath a plastic sheath. First of all, the lesion is marked with argon plasma coagulation. Then, a FTRD grasper pulls the lesion inside the cap. Immediately thereafter, the OTSC is deployed and the tissue above the clip is resected with the snare. The device has been well investigated in experimental models and animal studies [12, 13, 14]. At the moment, there are few case series describing the feasibility and safety of the technique in the literature. Fähndrich and Sandmann [11] described EFTR using a FTRD in 17 patients. The indications were: carcinoids, incompletely resected colon cancer, recurrent adenoma of the colon, and submucosal lesions. The technical success was 94% (16/17), and the complete resection (R0) rate was 100%. No complications were described [11]. In a recent study, 24 cases of EFTR with FTRD in the lower gastrointestinal tract were reported. Resection of the lesions was macroscopically complete and en bloc in 20/24 patients (83.3%). The mean diameter of the resection specimen was 24 mm (range, 12–40 mm). The R0 resection rate was 75.0% (18/24), and full-thickness resection was histologically confirmed in 87.5%. No perforations or major bleeding occurred during or after resection [10]. Other limited case reports described examples of incomplete resection of rectal adenocarcinoma, small neuroendocrine tumors of the lower intestine, and adenomas in difficult anatomic locations unsuitable for conventional endoscopic resection, such as diverticulum, or adenomas involving the appendiceal orifice [10, 15, 16, 17]. We describe the first case of two EFTR with FTRD performed simultaneously in the same colonoscopy to remove synchronous adenocarcinomas of the distal rectum: a carcinoma in situ relapsed on the scar of a previous mucosectomy and a non-lifting sign lesion resulted positive for adenocarcinoma with submucosa infiltration (sm1 sec. Kikuchi). We experienced that this novel technique is safe, feasible and, unlike ESD, allows obtaining full-thickness resection easily and rapidly. EFTR with FTRD is a non-time-consuming procedure and could become the best strategy for the endoscopic management of residual/local recurrent adenoma or no lifting lesions. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the device and technique.

Statement of Ethics

The authors complied with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the journal Case Reports in Gastroenterology. They declare that the subject in this case report gave informed consent and that the investigation was approved by the Ethics Committee of University Campus Bio Medico.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding sources to disclose.
  17 in total

1.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colon by using a clip-and-cut technique: an animal study.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Thomas Kratt; Thomas Rösch; Ulrike W Denzer; Guido Schachschal
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Authors:  Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Thierry Ponchon; Alessandro Repici; Michael Vieth; Antonella De Ceglie; Arnaldo Amato; Frieder Berr; Pradeep Bhandari; Andrzej Bialek; Massimo Conio; Jelle Haringsma; Cord Langner; Søren Meisner; Helmut Messmann; Mario Morino; Horst Neuhaus; Hubert Piessevaux; Massimo Rugge; Brian P Saunders; Michel Robaszkiewicz; Stefan Seewald; Sergey Kashin; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Cesare Hassan; Pierre H Deprez
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection and clip defect closure in the colon with the new FTRD system: experimental study.

Authors:  Marc O Schurr; Franziska E Baur; Martina Krautwald; Marion Fehlker; Manfred Wehrmann; Thomas Gottwald; Ruediger L Prosst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection of submucosal gastric tumors.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Thomas Rösch; Thomas Kratt; Ulrike W Denzer; Muhammad El-Masry; Guido Schachschal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Endoscopic piecemeal resection of large colorectal polyps with long-term followup.

Authors:  Lillias H Maguire; Paul C Shellito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Management of colorectal T1 carcinoma treated by endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Yusuke Saitoh; Yuhei Inaba; Takahiro Sasaki; Ryuji Sugiyama; Ryuji Sukegawa; Mikihiro Fujiya
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 7.559

7.  JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Hiroshi Kashida; Yutaka Saito; Naohisa Yahagi; Hiroo Yamano; Shoichi Saito; Takashi Hisabe; Takashi Yao; Masahiko Watanabe; Masahiro Yoshida; Shin-Ei Kudo; Osamu Tsuruta; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Toshiaki Watanabe; Yusuke Saitoh; Masahiro Igarashi; Takashi Toyonaga; Yoichi Ajioka; Masao Ichinose; Toshiyuki Matsui; Akira Sugita; Kentaro Sugano; Kazuma Fujimoto; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 7.559

8.  Over-the-scope clip-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of epithelial and subepithelial GI lesions.

Authors:  Badr Al-Bawardy; Elizabeth Rajan; Louis M Wong Kee Song
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum.

Authors:  Keisuke Hori; Toshio Uraoka; Keita Harada; Reiji Higashi; Yoshiro Kawahara; Hiroyuki Okada; Hemchand Ramberan; Naohisa Yahagi; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Watanabe; Michio Itabashi; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shinji Tanaka; Yoshinori Ito; Yoichi Ajioka; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Masahiro Igarashi; Hideyuki Ishida; Soichiro Ishihara; Megumi Ishiguro; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Norihiro Kokudo; Kei Muro; Atsushi Ochiai; Masahiko Oguchi; Yasuo Ohkura; Yutaka Saito; Yoshiharu Sakai; Hideki Ueno; Takayuki Yoshino; Narikazu Boku; Takahiro Fujimori; Nobuo Koinuma; Takayuki Morita; Genichi Nishimura; Yuh Sakata; Keiichi Takahashi; Osamu Tsuruta; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Masahiro Yoshida; Naohiko Yamaguchi; Kenjiro Kotake; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.