Kazutaka Kamiya 1 , Kimiya Shimizu 2 , Akihito Igarashi 2 , Yoshihiro Kitazawa 3 , Takashi Kojima 4 , Tomoaki Nakamura 5 , Yoshitaka Oka 6 , Rei Matsumoto 7 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
AIM: To compare the clinical outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with a central hole (Hole Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), STAAR Surgical) for low-to-moderate myopia and for high myopia. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective case series comprised 351 eyes of 351 consecutive patients undergoing ICL implantation . Eyes were divided into groups based on preoperative degree of myopia: group 1; 57 eyes, manifest spherical equivalent less than -6 dioptres (D), and group 2; 294 eyes, -6 D or more. Safety, efficacy, predictability, stability and adverse events were compared preoperatively; and at 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, RESULTS: Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were -0.17±0.14 and -0.21±0.10 logMAR in group 1, and -0.16±0.09 and -0.21±0.08 logMAR in group 2, 1 year postoperatively. In groups 1 and 2, 98% and 99% of eyes were within 1.0 D of the targeted correction. Manifest refraction changes of -0.12±0.34 D (group 1) and -0.18±0.43 D (group 2) occurred from 1 day to 1 year. ICL exchanges were necessary in two eyes (0.7%) in group 2. No vision-threatening complications occurred at any time. CONCLUSIONS: The ICL performed well for the correction of both low-to-moderate myopia and high myopia throughout the 1-year observation period. The clinical outcomes of ICL implantation for low-to-moderate myopia are essentially equivalent to those for high myopia. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
AIM: To compare the clinical outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with a central hole (Hole Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), STAAR Surgical) for low-to-moderate myopia and for high myopia . METHODS: This multicentre retrospective case series comprised 351 eyes of 351 consecutive patients undergoing ICL implantation. Eyes were divided into groups based on preoperative degree of myopia : group 1; 57 eyes, manifest spherical equivalent less than -6 dioptres (D), and group 2; 294 eyes, -6 D or more. Safety, efficacy, predictability, stability and adverse events were compared preoperatively; and at 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, RESULTS: Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were -0.17±0.14 and -0.21±0.10 logMAR in group 1, and -0.16±0.09 and -0.21±0.08 logMAR in group 2, 1 year postoperatively. In groups 1 and 2, 98% and 99% of eyes were within 1.0 D of the targeted correction. Manifest refraction changes of -0.12±0.34 D (group 1) and -0.18±0.43 D (group 2) occurred from 1 day to 1 year. ICL exchanges were necessary in two eyes (0.7%) in group 2. No vision-threatening complications occurred at any time. CONCLUSIONS: The ICL performed well for the correction of both low-to-moderate myopia and high myopia throughout the 1-year observation period. The clinical outcomes of ICL implantation for low-to-moderate myopia are essentially equivalent to those for high myopia . © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
efficacy; endothelial cell density; high myopia.; hole ICL; intraocular pressure; low-to-moderate myopia; phakic IOL; predictability; safety; stability
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2017
PMID： 28611132 DOI： 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Ophthalmol ISSN： 0007-1161 Impact factor: 4.638