Sehoon Park1, Seung Mi Lee2, Joong Shin Park2, Joon-Seok Hong3, Ho Jun Chin4,5, Ki Young Na4,5, Dong Ki Kim5,6, Kook-Hwan Oh6, Kwon Wook Joo5,6, Yon Su Kim1,5,6, Hajeong Lee7,6. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 5. Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 7. Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and mdhjlee@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although hemodynamic adaptation plays a crucial role in maintaining gestation, the clinical significance of midterm renal hyperfiltration (MRH) on pregnancy outcomes is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This was an observational cohort study. Women with a singleton pregnancy and a serum creatinine measurement during their second trimester were followed at two university hospitals in Korea between 2001 and 2015. Those with substantial renal function impairment or who delivered during the second trimester were not considered. MRH was represented by the highest eGFR, which was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration method. An adverse pregnancy event was defined by the composition of preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks), low birth weight (<2.5 kg), and preeclampsia. RESULTS: Data from 1931 pregnancies were included. The relationship between midterm eGFR and adverse pregnancy outcomes, which occurred in 538 mothers, was defined by a nonlinear U-shaped curve. The adjusted odds ratio and associated 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of an adverse pregnancy outcome for eGFR levels below and above the reference level of 120-150 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were 1.97 (95% CI, 1.34 to 2.89; P<0.001) for ≥150 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 1.57 (95% CI, 1.23 to 2.00; P<0.001) for 90-120 ml/min per 1.73 m2; and 4.93 (95% CI, 1.97 to 12.31; P<0.001) for 60-90 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Moreover, among mothers without baseline CKD, women with adverse pregnancy outcomes had less prominent MRH than those without (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a unique U-shaped relationship between midterm eGFR and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the optimal range of midterm eGFR levels was 120-150 ml/min per 1.73 m2. In those without evident functional renal impairment, the absence of prominent MRH might be a significant risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although hemodynamic adaptation plays a crucial role in maintaining gestation, the clinical significance of midterm renal hyperfiltration (MRH) on pregnancy outcomes is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This was an observational cohort study. Women with a singleton pregnancy and a serum creatinine measurement during their second trimester were followed at two university hospitals in Korea between 2001 and 2015. Those with substantial renal function impairment or who delivered during the second trimester were not considered. MRH was represented by the highest eGFR, which was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration method. An adverse pregnancy event was defined by the composition of preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks), low birth weight (<2.5 kg), and preeclampsia. RESULTS: Data from 1931 pregnancies were included. The relationship between midterm eGFR and adverse pregnancy outcomes, which occurred in 538 mothers, was defined by a nonlinear U-shaped curve. The adjusted odds ratio and associated 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of an adverse pregnancy outcome for eGFR levels below and above the reference level of 120-150 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were 1.97 (95% CI, 1.34 to 2.89; P<0.001) for ≥150 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 1.57 (95% CI, 1.23 to 2.00; P<0.001) for 90-120 ml/min per 1.73 m2; and 4.93 (95% CI, 1.97 to 12.31; P<0.001) for 60-90 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Moreover, among mothers without baseline CKD, women with adverse pregnancy outcomes had less prominent MRH than those without (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a unique U-shaped relationship between midterm eGFR and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the optimal range of midterm eGFR levels was 120-150 ml/min per 1.73 m2. In those without evident functional renal impairment, the absence of prominent MRH might be a significant risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes.
Authors: Kyung Don Yoo; Hyung-Jin Yoon; Seung-Sik Hwang; Nam Ju Heo; Ho Jun Chin; Seung Hee Yang; Kwon Wook Joo; Yon Su Kim; Hajeong Lee Journal: Nephrology (Carlton) Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: M A Cadnapaphornchai; M Ohara; K G Morris; M Knotek; B Rogachev; T Ladtkow; E P Carter; R W Schrier Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2001-04
Authors: C Ronco; A Brendolan; L Bragantini; S Chiaramonte; A Fabris; M Feriani; R Dell Aquila; M Milan; P Mentasti; G La Greca Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 1988 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Kate Tilling; Abigail Fraser; Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jessica Sheehan Tangren; Wan Ahmad Hafiz Wan Md Adnan; Camille E Powe; Jeffrey Ecker; Kate Bramham; Michelle A Hladunewich; Elizabeth Ankers; S Ananth Karumanchi; Ravi Thadhani Journal: Hypertension Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Marleen C van Buren; Margriet Gosselink; Henk Groen; Henk van Hamersvelt; Margriet de Jong; Martin H de Borst; Robert Zietse; Jacqueline van de Wetering; A Titia Lely Journal: Transplantation Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Anke Schwarz; Roland Schmitt; Gunilla Einecke; Frieder Keller; Ulrike Bode; Hermann Haller; Hans Heinrich Guenter Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 2.388