Harshvardhan Singh1, Ozell Sanders1, Sandy McCombe Waller1, Woei-Nan Bair2, Brock Beamer3, Robert A Creath1, Mark W Rogers4. 1. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD. 3. Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Baltimore, MD. 4. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mrogers@som.umaryland.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare gait speed during head-forward and side-to-side head-turn walking in individuals with lower versus greater lateral balance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=93; 42 men, 51 women; mean age ± SD, 73 ± 6.08y) who could walk independently. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Balance tolerance limit (BTL), defined as the lowest perturbation intensity where a multistep balance recovery pattern was first evoked in response to randomized lateral waist-pull perturbations of standing balance to the left and right sides, at 6 different intensities (range from level 2: 4.5-cm displacement at 180cm/s2 acceleration, to level 7: 22.5-cm displacement at 900cm/s2 acceleration); (2) gait speed, determined using an instrumented gait mat; (3) balance, evaluated with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; and (4) mobility, determined with the Timed Up and Go (TUG). RESULTS: Individuals with low versus high BTL had a slower self-selected head-forward gait speed and head-turn gait speed (P=.002 and P<.001, respectively); the magnitude of difference was greater in head-turn gait speed than head-forward gait speed (Cohen's d=1.0 vs 0.6). Head-turn gait speed best predicted BTL. BTL was moderately and positively related (P=.003) to the ABC Scale and negatively related (P=.017) to TUG. CONCLUSIONS: Head-turn gait speed is affected to a greater extent than head-forward gait speed in older individuals with poorer lateral balance and at greater risk of falls. Moreover, head-turn gait speed can be used to assess the interactions of limitations in lateral balance function and gait speed in relation to fall risk in older adults.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare gait speed during head-forward and side-to-side head-turn walking in individuals with lower versus greater lateral balance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=93; 42 men, 51 women; mean age ± SD, 73 ± 6.08y) who could walk independently. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Balance tolerance limit (BTL), defined as the lowest perturbation intensity where a multistep balance recovery pattern was first evoked in response to randomized lateral waist-pull perturbations of standing balance to the left and right sides, at 6 different intensities (range from level 2: 4.5-cm displacement at 180cm/s2 acceleration, to level 7: 22.5-cm displacement at 900cm/s2 acceleration); (2) gait speed, determined using an instrumented gait mat; (3) balance, evaluated with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; and (4) mobility, determined with the Timed Up and Go (TUG). RESULTS: Individuals with low versus high BTL had a slower self-selected head-forward gait speed and head-turn gait speed (P=.002 and P<.001, respectively); the magnitude of difference was greater in head-turn gait speed than head-forward gait speed (Cohen's d=1.0 vs 0.6). Head-turn gait speed best predicted BTL. BTL was moderately and positively related (P=.003) to the ABC Scale and negatively related (P=.017) to TUG. CONCLUSIONS: Head-turn gait speed is affected to a greater extent than head-forward gait speed in older individuals with poorer lateral balance and at greater risk of falls. Moreover, head-turn gait speed can be used to assess the interactions of limitations in lateral balance function and gait speed in relation to fall risk in older adults.
Authors: Don A Yungher; Judith Morgia; Woei-Nan Bair; Mario Inacio; Brock A Beamer; Michelle G Prettyman; Mark W Rogers Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2011-10-15 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: V A Hughes; W R Frontera; M Wood; W J Evans; G E Dallal; R Roubenoff; M A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Bret H Goodpaster; Seok Won Park; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Kritchevsky; Michael Nevitt; Ann V Schwartz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Frances A Tylavsky; Marjolein Visser; Anne B Newman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Vicki L Gray; Andrew P Goldberg; Mark W Rogers; Laila Anthony; Michael L Terrin; Jack M Guralnik; William C Blackwelder; Diana F H Lam; Siddhartha Sikdar; Brajesh K Lal Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Bo Ryun Kim; Sang Rim Kim; Kwang Woo Nam; So Young Lee; Yong Geun Park; Min Ji Suh; Young Tae Jeon Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 1.817