Literature DB >> 28610745

The impact of type and number of bowel resections on anastomotic leakage risk in advanced ovarian cancer surgery.

Christoph Grimm1, Philipp Harter2, Pier F Alesina3, Sonia Prader2, Stephanie Schneider2, Beyhan Ataseven2, Beate Meier3, Violetta Brunkhorst4, Jakob Hinrichs3, Christian Kurzeder2, Florian Heitz2, Annett Kahl2, Alexander Traut2, Harald T Groeben4, Martin Walz3, Andreas du Bois2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing primary advanced ovarian cancer surgery and to evaluate the prognostic implication of AL on overall survival in these patients.
METHODS: We analyzed our institutional database for primary EOC and included all consecutive patients treated by debulking surgery including any type of full circumferential bowel resection beyond appendectomy between 1999 and 2015. We performed logistic regression models to identify risk factors for AL and log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between AL and survival.
RESULTS: AL occurred in 36/800 (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [3%-6%]) of all patients with advanced ovarian cancer and 36/518 (6.9% [5%-9%]) patients undergoing bowel resection during debulking surgery. One hundred fifty-six (30.1%) patients had multiple bowel resections. In these patients, AL rate per patient was only slightly higher (9.0% [5%-13%]) than in patients with rectosigmoid resection only (6.9% [4%-10%]), despite the higher number of anastomosis. No independent predictive factors for AL were identified. AL was independently associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.9 [1.2-3.4], p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: In the present study, no predictive pre- and/or intraoperative risk factors for AL were identified. AL rate was mainly influenced by rectosigmoid resection and only marginally increased by additional bowel resections.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Bowel resection; Debulking surgery; Epithelial ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28610745     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  20 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Rectosigmoid Mesorectal Sparing Resection: A Feasible Technique and a Viable Option in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  A Rosati; V Vargiu; F Santullo; C Lodoli; M Attalla El Halabieh; G Scambia; A Fagotti; B Costantini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Rectosigmoid Mesorectal-Sparing Resection in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  A Rosati; V Vargiu; F Santullo; C Lodoli; M Attalla El Halabieh; G Scambia; A Fagotti; B Costantini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Surgical technique of visceral segmental serosectomy for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Soo Jin Park; Hee Seung Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 4.  Extrapelvic bowel resection and anastomosis in cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joo-Hyuk Son; Suk-Joon Chang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

5.  ASO Author Reflections: Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery-What We Know and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Virginia Vargiu; Francesco Santullo; Andrea Rosati; Barbara Costantini; Valerio Gallotta; Claudio Lodoli; Fabio Pacelli; Giovanni Scambia; Anna Fagotti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Shaun Hiu; Andrew Bryant; Ketankumar Gajjar; Patience T Kunonga; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-30

7.  The impact of near-infrared angiography and proctoscopy after rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis performed during surgeries for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Lea A Moukarzel; Maureen E Byrne; Stephanie Leiva; Michelle Wu; Qin C Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Ginger Gardner; Mario M Leitao; Vance A Broach; Dennis S Chi; Kara Long Roche; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Risk Factors for Severe Complications in Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Eva Katharina Egger; Natascha Kohls; Matthias B Stope; Mateja Condic; Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik; Dominique KÖnsgen; Tobias Hilbert; Sven Klaschik; Daniel Exner; Tim Vilz; Alexander Mustea
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 9.  IGCS Intraoperative Technology Taskforce. Update on near infrared imaging technology: beyond white light and the naked eye, indocyanine green and near infrared technology in the treatment of gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Roberto Angioli; Arthur E Bailey; Vance Broach; Alessandro Buda; Michelle R Coriddi; Joseph H Dayan; Michael Frumovitz; Yong Man Kim; Rainer Kimmig; Mario M Leitao; Mustafa Zelal Muallem; Matt McKittrick; Babak Mehrara; Roberto Montera; Lea A Moukarzel; Raj Naik; Silvana Pedra Nobre; Marie Plante; Francesco Plotti; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Clinical Phenotypes of Tumors Invading the Rectosigmoid Colon Affecting the Extent of Debulking Surgery and Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Soo Jin Park; Jaehee Mun; Eun Ji Lee; Sunwoo Park; Sang Youn Kim; Whasun Lim; Gwonhwa Song; Jae-Weon Kim; Seungmee Lee; Hee Seung Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.