| Literature DB >> 28610481 |
Siddharth Shanbhag1, Andreas Stavropoulos2, Salwa Suliman1, Tor Hervig3, Kamal Mustafa1.
Abstract
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) is the most commonly used supplement for ex vivo expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) for bone tissue engineering applications. However, from a clinical standpoint, it is important to substitute animal-derived products according to current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) guidelines. Humanized alternatives to FBS include three categories of products: human serum (HS), human platelet derivatives (HPDs)-including platelet lysate (PL) or platelet releasate (PR), produced by freeze/thawing or chemical activation of platelet concentrates, respectively, and chemically defined media (serum-free) (CDM). In this systematic literature review, the in vitro and in vivo osteogenic potential of hMSCs expanded in humanized (HS-, HPD-, or CDM-supplemented) media versus hMSCs expanded in FBS-supplemented media, was compared. In addition, PL and PR were compared in terms of their growth factor (GF)/cytokine-content and cell-culture efficacy. When using either 10-20% autologous or pooled HS, 3-10% pooled HPDs or CDM supplemented with GFs, in comparison with 10-20% FBS, a majority of studies reported similar or superior in vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, and in vivo bone formation in ectopic or orthotopic rodent models. Moreover, a trend for higher GF content was observed in PL versus PR, although evidence for cell culture efficacy is limited. In summary, humanized supplements seem at least equally effective as FBS for hMSC expansion and osteogenic differentiation. Although pooled HPDs appear to be the most favorable supplement for large-scale hMSC expansion, further efforts are needed to standardize the preparation and composition of these products in compliance with cGMP standards.Entities:
Keywords: good manufacturing practices; human serum; mesenchymal stem cells; platelet lysate; platelet releasate; platelet-rich plasma; serum-free media
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28610481 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2017.0093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tissue Eng Part B Rev ISSN: 1937-3368 Impact factor: 6.389