Literature DB >> 28609729

Reliability of pathogen control in direct potable reuse: Performance evaluation and QMRA of a full-scale 1 MGD advanced treatment train.

Brian M Pecson1, Sarah C Triolo2, Simon Olivieri3, Elise C Chen4, Aleksey N Pisarenko4, Chao-Chun Yang5, Adam Olivieri6, Charles N Haas7, R Shane Trussell4, R Rhodes Trussell5.   

Abstract

To safely progress toward direct potable reuse (DPR), it is essential to ensure that DPR systems can provide public health protection equivalent to or greater than that of conventional drinking water sources. This study collected data over a one-year period from a full-scale DPR demonstration facility, and used both performance distribution functions (PDFs) and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to define and evaluate the reliability of the advanced water treatment facility (AWTF). The AWTF's ability to control enterovirus, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium was characterized using online monitoring of surrogates in a treatment train consisting of ozone, biological activated carbon, microfiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet light with an advanced oxidation process. This process train was selected to improve reliability by providing redundancy, defined as the provision of treatment beyond the minimum needed to meet regulatory requirements. The PDFs demonstrated treatment that consistently exceeded the 12/10/10-log thresholds for virus, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium, as currently required for potable reuse in California (via groundwater recharge and surface water augmentation). Because no critical process failures impacted pathogen removal performance during the yearlong testing, hypothetical failures were incorporated into the analysis to understand the benefit of treatment redundancy on performance. Each unit process was modeled with a single failure per year lasting four different failure durations: 15 min, 60 min, 8 h, and 24 h. QMRA was used to quantify the impact of failures on pathogen risk. The median annual risk of infection for Cryptosporidium was 4.9 × 10-11 in the absence of failures, and reached a maximum of 1.1 × 10-5 assuming one 24-h failure per process per year. With the inclusion of free chlorine disinfection as part of the treatment process, enterovirus had a median annual infection risk of 1.5 × 10-14 (no failures) and a maximum annual value of 2.1 × 10-5 (assuming one 24-h failure per year). Even with conservative failure assumptions, pathogen risk from this treatment train remains below the risk targets for both the U.S. (10-4 infections/person/year) and the WHO (approximately 10-3 infections/person/year, equivalent to 10-6 DALY/person/year), demonstrating the value of a failure prevention strategy based on treatment redundancy.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct potable reuse; Quantitative microbial risk assessment; Redundancy; Reliability; Treatment performance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28609729     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  9 in total

1.  Direct potable reuse microbial risk assessment methodology: Sensitivity analysis and application to State log credit allocations.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Soller; Sorina E Eftim; Sharon P Nappier
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 2.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment and Infectious Disease Transmission Modeling of Waterborne Enteric Pathogens.

Authors:  Andrew F Brouwer; Nina B Masters; Joseph N S Eisenberg
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-06

3.  Human health impact of non-potable reuse of distributed wastewater and greywater treated by membrane bioreactors.

Authors:  Mary E Schoen; Michael A Jahne; Jay Garland
Journal:  Microb Risk Anal       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  Potable Water Reuse: What Are the Microbiological Risks?

Authors:  Sharon P Nappier; Jeffrey A Soller; Sorina E Eftim
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-06

5.  Human Health, Economic and Environmental Assessment of Onsite Non-Potable Water Reuse Systems for a Large, Mixed-Use Urban Building.

Authors:  Sam Arden; Ben Morelli; Mary Schoen; Sarah Cashman; Michael Jahne; Xin Cissy Ma; Jay Garland
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Retention of E. coli and water on the skin after liquid contact.

Authors:  Ana K Pitol; Tamar Kohn; Timothy R Julian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating the sustainability of indirect potable reuse and direct potable reuse: a southern Nevada case study.

Authors:  Cory Dow; Sajjad Ahmad; Krystyna Stave; Daniel Gerrity
Journal:  AWWA Water Sci       Date:  2019-08-27

8.  Application of QMRA to MAR operations for safe agricultural water reuses in coastal areas.

Authors:  Costantino Masciopinto; Michele Vurro; Nicola Lorusso; Domenico Santoro; Charles N Haas
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2020-08-19

Review 9.  Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water and Wastewater Viral Disinfection. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Petros Kokkinos; Danae Venieri; Dionissios Mantzavinos
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.778

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.