James F Holmes1, Kenneth M Kelley1, Sandra L Wootton-Gorges2, Garth H Utter3, Lisa P Abramson3, John S Rose1, Daniel J Tancredi4, Nathan Kuppermann5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento. 2. Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento. 3. Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento4Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Abstract
Importance: The utility of the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination in children is unknown. Objective: To determine if the FAST examination during initial evaluation of injured children improves clinical care. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial (April 2012-May 2015) that involved 975 hemodynamically stable children and adolescents younger than 18 years treated for blunt torso trauma at the University of California, Davis Medical Center, a level I trauma center. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to a standard trauma evaluation with the FAST examination by the treating ED physician or a standard trauma evaluation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were rate of abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans in the ED, missed intra-abdominal injuries, ED length of stay, and hospital charges. Results: Among the 925 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 9.7 [5.3] years; 575 males [62%]), all completed the study. A total of 50 patients (5.4%, 95% CI, 4.0% to 7.1%) were diagnosed with intra-abdominal injuries, including 40 (80%; 95% CI, 66% to 90%) who had intraperitoneal fluid found on an abdominal CT scan, and 9 patients (0.97%; 95% CI, 0.44% to 1.8%) underwent laparotomy. The proportion of patients with abdominal CT scans was 241 of 460 (52.4%) in the FAST group and 254 of 465 (54.6%) in the standard care-only group (difference, -2.2%; 95% CI, -8.7% to 4.2%). One case of missed intra-abdominal injury occurred in a patient in the FAST group and none in the control group (difference, 0.2%; 95% CI, -0.6% to 1.2%). The mean ED length of stay was 6.03 hours in the FAST group and 6.07 hours in the standard care-only group (difference, -0.04 hours; 95% CI, -0.47 to 0.40 hours). Median hospital charges were $46 415 in the FAST group and $47 759 in the standard care-only group (difference, -$1180; 95% CI, -$6651 to $4291). Conclusions and Relevance: Among hemodynamically stable children treated in an ED following blunt torso trauma, the use of FAST compared with standard care only did not improve clinical care, including use of resources; ED length of stay; missed intra-abdominal injuries; or hospital charges. These findings do not support the routine use of FAST in this setting. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01540318.
RCT Entities:
Importance: The utility of the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination in children is unknown. Objective: To determine if the FAST examination during initial evaluation of injured children improves clinical care. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial (April 2012-May 2015) that involved 975 hemodynamically stable children and adolescents younger than 18 years treated for blunt torso trauma at the University of California, Davis Medical Center, a level I trauma center. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to a standard trauma evaluation with the FAST examination by the treating ED physician or a standard trauma evaluation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were rate of abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scans in the ED, missed intra-abdominal injuries, ED length of stay, and hospital charges. Results: Among the 925 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 9.7 [5.3] years; 575 males [62%]), all completed the study. A total of 50 patients (5.4%, 95% CI, 4.0% to 7.1%) were diagnosed with intra-abdominal injuries, including 40 (80%; 95% CI, 66% to 90%) who had intraperitoneal fluid found on an abdominal CT scan, and 9 patients (0.97%; 95% CI, 0.44% to 1.8%) underwent laparotomy. The proportion of patients with abdominal CT scans was 241 of 460 (52.4%) in the FAST group and 254 of 465 (54.6%) in the standard care-only group (difference, -2.2%; 95% CI, -8.7% to 4.2%). One case of missed intra-abdominal injury occurred in a patient in the FAST group and none in the control group (difference, 0.2%; 95% CI, -0.6% to 1.2%). The mean ED length of stay was 6.03 hours in the FAST group and 6.07 hours in the standard care-only group (difference, -0.04 hours; 95% CI, -0.47 to 0.40 hours). Median hospital charges were $46 415 in the FAST group and $47 759 in the standard care-only group (difference, -$1180; 95% CI, -$6651 to $4291). Conclusions and Relevance: Among hemodynamically stable children treated in an ED following blunt torso trauma, the use of FAST compared with standard care only did not improve clinical care, including use of resources; ED length of stay; missed intra-abdominal injuries; or hospital charges. These findings do not support the routine use of FAST in this setting. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01540318.
Authors: Jay Menaker; Stephen Blumberg; David H Wisner; Peter S Dayan; Michael Tunik; Madelyn Garcia; Prashant Mahajan; Kent Page; David Monroe; Dominic Borgialli; Nathan Kuppermann; James F Holmes Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: James F Holmes; Kathleen Lillis; David Monroe; Dominic Borgialli; Benjamin T Kerrey; Prashant Mahajan; Kathleen Adelgais; Angela M Ellison; Kenneth Yen; Shireen Atabaki; Jay Menaker; Bema Bonsu; Kimberly S Quayle; Madelyn Garcia; Alexander Rogers; Stephen Blumberg; Lois Lee; Michael Tunik; Joshua Kooistra; Maria Kwok; Lawrence J Cook; J Michael Dean; Peter E Sokolove; David H Wisner; Peter Ehrlich; Arthur Cooper; Peter S Dayan; Sandra Wootton-Gorges; Nathan Kuppermann Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Aaron E Kornblith; Newton Addo; Ruolei Dong; Robert Rogers; Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan; Atul Butte; Pavan Gupta; Rachael A Callcut; Rima Arnaout Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Megan K Long; Mohammed K Vohra; Austin Bonnette; Pablo D Vega Parra; Sara K Miller; Emily Ayub; Henry E Wang; Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas; Richard Gordon; Irma T Ugalde; Myron Allukian; Hannah E Smith Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2022-01-27
Authors: Elsa A van Wassenaer; Joost G Daams; Marc A Benninga; Karen Rosendahl; Bart G P Koot; Samuel Stafrace; Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-04-10
Authors: Peter Zimmermann; Torben Schmidt; Jana Nelson; Jan-Hendrik Gosemann; Stefan Bassler; Jona T Stahmeyer; Franz Wolfgang Hirsch; Martin Lacher; Jan Zeidler Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 1.817