Literature DB >> 28609192

Evaluation of the well mixed room and near-field far-field models in occupational settings.

Susan F Arnold1, Yuan Shao1, Gurumurthy Ramachandran2.   

Abstract

Drawing appropriate conclusions about a scenario for which the exposure is truly unacceptable drives appropriate exposure and risk management, and protects the health and safety of those individuals. To ensure the vast majority of these decisions are accurate, these decisions must be based upon proven approaches and tools. When these decisions are based solely on professional judgment guided by subjective inputs, however, they are more than likely wrong, and biased, underestimating the true exposure. Models have been shown anecdotally to be useful in accurately predicting exposure but their use in occupational hygiene has been limited. Possible reasons are a general lack of guidance on model selection and use and scant model input data. The lack of systematic evaluation of the models is also an important factor. This research is the second phase of work building upon the robust evaluation of the Well Mixed Room (WMR) and Near Field Far Field (NF-FF) models under controlled conditions in an exposure chamber, [5] in which good concordance between measured and modeled airborne concentrations of three solvents under a range of conditions was observed. In real world environments, the opportunity to control environmental conditions is limited and measuring the model inputs directly can be challenging; in many cases, model inputs must be estimated indirectly without measurement. These circumstances contribute to increased model input uncertainty and consequent uncertainty in the output. Field studies of model performance directly inform us about how well models predict exposures given these practical limitations, and are, therefore, an important component of model evaluation. The evaluation included ten diverse contaminant-exposure scenarios at five workplaces involving six different contaminants. A database of parameter values and measured and modeled exposures was developed and will be useful for modeling similar scenarios in the future.

Keywords:  Field study; Near Field Far Field; Well Mixed Room; model evaluation; models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28609192     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1321843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  4 in total

1.  Estimation of Airborne Vapor Concentrations of Oil Dispersants COREXIT™ EC9527A and EC9500A, Volatile Components Associated with the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Response and Clean-up Operations.

Authors:  Mark R Stenzel; Susan F Arnold; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Richard K Kwok; Lawrence S Engel; Dale P Sandler; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.779

2.  Estimating Inhalation Exposure Resulting from Evaporation of Volatile Multicomponent Mixtures Using Different Modelling Approaches.

Authors:  Martin Tischer; Michael Roitzsch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Theoretical Background of Occupational-Exposure Models-Report of an Expert Workshop of the ISES Europe Working Group "Exposure Models".

Authors:  Urs Schlüter; Susan Arnold; Francesca Borghi; John Cherrie; Wouter Fransman; Henri Heussen; Michael Jayjock; Keld Alstrup Jensen; Joonas Koivisto; Dorothea Koppisch; Jessica Meyer; Andrea Spinazzè; Celia Tanarro; Steven Verpaele; Natalie von Goetz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Modeling Clothing as a Vector for Transporting Airborne Particles and Pathogens across Indoor Microenvironments.

Authors:  Jacob Kvasnicka; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Jeffrey A Siegel; James A Scott; Miriam L Diamond
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 11.357

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.