Literature DB >> 28609169

A gap analysis of the United States death care sector to determine training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease mitigation and management.

Aurora B Le1, Lesley Witter2, Jocelyn J Herstein3, Katelyn C Jelden4, Elizabeth L Beam5,6, Shawn G Gibbs1, John J Lowe3,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A United States industry-specific gap analysis survey of the death care sector-which comprises organizations and businesses affiliated with the funeral industry and the handling of human remains- was developed, the results analyzed, and training and education needs in relation to highly infectious disease mitigation and management were explored in an effort to identify where occupational health and safety can be enhanced in this worker population.
METHODS: Collaborating national death care organizations distributed the 47-question electronic survey. N = 424 surveys were initiated and results recorded. The survey collected death care sector-specific information pertaining to the comfortability and willingness to handle highly infectious remains; perceptions of readiness, current policies and procedures in place to address highly infectious diseases; current highly infectious disease training levels, available resources, and personal protective equipment.
RESULTS: One-third of respondents have been trained on how to manage highly infectious remains. There was a discrepancy between Supervisor/Management and Employee/Worker perceptions on employees' willingness and comfortability to manage potentially highly infectious remains. More than 40% of respondents did not know the correct routes of transmission for viral hemorrhagic fevers.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest death care workers could benefit from increasing up-to-date industry-specific training and education on highly infectious disease risk mitigation and management. Professional death care sector organizations are positioned to disseminate information, training, and best practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death care; Ebola virus disease; highly infectious remains; infectious disease education; infectious disease training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28609169     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1319570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  4 in total

1.  Stakeholder Perspective of Handling the Deceased during the Nipah Virus Outbreak in Kerala, South India, 2018.

Authors:  Prajitha Kannamkottapilly Chandrasekharan; Arya Rahul; Ramachandran Nair Saraswathy Gopakumar; Anish Thekkumkara Surendran Nair
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Determining training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease preparedness and response: A gap analysis survey of US emergency medical services practitioners.

Authors:  Aurora B Le; Sean A Buehler; Paul M Maniscalco; Pamela Lane; Lloyd E Rupp; Eric Ernest; Debra Von Seggern; Katherine West; Jocelyn J Herstein; Katelyn C Jelden; Elizabeth L Beam; Shawn G Gibbs; John J Lowe
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  A pilot survey of the U.S. medical waste industry to determine training needs for safely handling highly infectious waste.

Authors:  Aurora B Le; Selin Hoboy; Anne Germain; Hal Miller; Richard Thompson; Jocelyn J Herstein; Katelyn C Jelden; Elizabeth L Beam; Shawn G Gibbs; John J Lowe
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  U.S. Medical Examiner/Coroner capability to handle highly infectious decedents.

Authors:  Aurora B Le; Erin G Brooks; Lily A McNulty; James R Gill; Jocelyn J Herstein; Janelle Rios; Scott J Patlovich; Katelyn C Jelden; Kendra K Schmid; John J Lowe; Shawn G Gibbs
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.