S Schleder1, L Luerken2, L M Dendl2, A Redel3, M Selgrad4, P Renner5, C Stroszczynski2, A G Schreyer2. 1. Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. stephan.schleder@ukr.de. 2. Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 4. Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 5. Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of CT scans on diagnosis or change of therapy in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and obscure clinical infection. METHODS: CT records of patients with obscure clinical infection and SIRS or sepsis were retrospectively evaluated. Both confirmation of and changes in the diagnosis or therapy based on CT findings were analysed by means of the hospital information system and radiological information system. A sub-group analysis included differences with regard to anatomical region, medical history and referring department. RESULTS: Of 525 consecutive patients evaluated, 59% had been referred from internal medicine and 41% from surgery. CT examination had confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 26% and had resulted in a different diagnosis in 33% and a change of therapy in 32%. Abdominal scans yielded a significantly higher (p=0.013) change of therapy rate (42%) than thoracic scans (22%). Therapy was changed significantly more often (p=0.016) in surgical patients (38%) than in patients referred from internal medicine (28%). CONCLUSIONS: CT examination for detecting an unknown infection focus in patients with SIRS or sepsis is highly beneficial and should be conducted in patients with obscure clinical infection. KEY POINTS: • Evaluation of patients with obscure clinical infection is a challenging task. • CT examination of patients with SIRS or sepsis seems to be beneficial. • CT examination confirmed suspected diagnosis in 26% of patients. • CT examination yielded a new infection focus in 33% of patients. • CT examination changed therapy in up to 32% of patients.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of CT scans on diagnosis or change of therapy in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and obscure clinical infection. METHODS: CT records of patients with obscure clinical infection and SIRS or sepsis were retrospectively evaluated. Both confirmation of and changes in the diagnosis or therapy based on CT findings were analysed by means of the hospital information system and radiological information system. A sub-group analysis included differences with regard to anatomical region, medical history and referring department. RESULTS: Of 525 consecutive patients evaluated, 59% had been referred from internal medicine and 41% from surgery. CT examination had confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 26% and had resulted in a different diagnosis in 33% and a change of therapy in 32%. Abdominal scans yielded a significantly higher (p=0.013) change of therapy rate (42%) than thoracic scans (22%). Therapy was changed significantly more often (p=0.016) in surgical patients (38%) than in patients referred from internal medicine (28%). CONCLUSIONS: CT examination for detecting an unknown infection focus in patients with SIRS or sepsis is highly beneficial and should be conducted in patients with obscure clinical infection. KEY POINTS: • Evaluation of patients with obscure clinical infection is a challenging task. • CT examination of patients with SIRS or sepsis seems to be beneficial. • CT examination confirmed suspected diagnosis in 26% of patients. • CT examination yielded a new infection focus in 33% of patients. • CT examination changed therapy in up to 32% of patients.
Authors: Isabel Wiesinger; Gregor Scharf; Natascha Platz; Lena M Dendl; Michael T Pawlik; Christian Stroszczynski; Andreas G Schreyer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Francois Jamar; John Buscombe; Arturo Chiti; Paul E Christian; Dominique Delbeke; Kevin J Donohoe; Ora Israel; Josep Martin-Comin; Alberto Signore Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Pari V Pandharipande; Andrew T Reisner; William D Binder; Atif Zaheer; Martin L Gunn; Ken F Linnau; Chad M Miller; Laura L Avery; Maurice S Herring; Angela C Tramontano; Emily C Dowling; Hani H Abujudeh; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Elkan F Halpern; Karen Donelan; G Scott Gazelle Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: L K Ahvenjärvi; J J Laurila; A Jartti; P Ylipalosaari; T I Ala-Kokko; H P Syrjälä Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: Julian Pohlan; Jawed Nawabi; Denis Witham; Luna Schroth; Finn Krause; Jan Schulze; Simon Gelen; Robert Ahlborn; Kerstin Rubarth; Marc Dewey Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.086