| Literature DB >> 28607955 |
Olivera Stojadinovic1,2, Tongyu C Wikramanayake1,3, Alexandra C Villasante Fricke1, Natalie C Yin1, Liang Liang1, Eleanor Hinde4, Julia Escandon1, Marjana Tomic-Canic1,5,6, David M Ansell4, Ralf Paus4,7, Joaquin J Jimenez1,8.
Abstract
Wound healing is a complex process regulated by various cell types and a plethora of mediators. While interactions between wounded skin and the hair follicles (HFs) could induce HF neogenesis or promote wound healing, it remains unknown whether the wound healing-associated signaling milieu can be manipulated to protect against alopecia, such as chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Utilizing a well-established neonatal rat model of CIA, we show here that skin wounding protects from alopecia caused by several clinically relevant chemotherapeutic regimens, and that protection is dependent on the time of wounding and hair cycle stage. Gene expression profiling unveiled a significant increase in interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) mediated signaling by skin wounding. Subsequently, we showed that IL-1β is sufficient and indispensable for mediating the CIA-protective effect. Administration of IL-1β alone to unwounded rats exhibited local CIA protection while IL-1β neutralization abrogated CIA protection by wounding. Mechanistically, IL-1β retarded postnatal HF morphogenesis, making HFs at the wound sites or IL-1β treated areas damage-resistant while the rats developed total alopecia elsewhere. We conclude that wound healing switches the cutaneous cytokine milieu to an IL-1β-dominated state thus retarding HF growth progression and rendering the HFs resistant to chemotherapy agents. In the future, manipulation of HF progression through interfering with the IL-1β signaling milieu may provide therapeutic benefits to a variety of conditions, from prevention of CIA to inhibition of hair growth and treatment of hirsutism.Entities:
Keywords: Medicine
Year: 2017 PMID: 28607955 PMCID: PMC5454141 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00309
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Unintentional (A–D) and induced incisional wounds (E) protected from chemotherapy-induced alopecia at the wound sites. (A–D) Gross phenotype of a rat pup wounded (arrowheads) by its mother on postnatal day 1 (PD1) (B), and protection of hair loss at the wound sites on PD21 (D), compared with an unwounded littermate that developed total alopecia on the trunk (C), after treatment with etoposide on PD11-13. (E) Protection of hair loss at the site of an incisional wound (induced on PD3) on PD21, compared with total alopecia on the trunk in an unwounded littermate (n = 8 each). (F) Comparison of awl hair shaft length between the incisional sites and contralateral unwounded sites (n = 5). Bars denote standard deviation, and asterisks (*) denote statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Incisional wound induction and chemotherapeutic agent treatment in young rats. Rat pups (n = 10/group) were wounded by incision on days 3, 8 or 11 after birth, and subsequently (PD11-13) received various chemotherapeutic agents to induce alopecia. Groups k-m pups were unwounded, and group d pups received no chemotherapy. Two pups from each group were euthanized on PD11 for histology. Pups were monitored daily for hair loss.
| Group | Wounded | Injection (n = 10 each) | Outcome on PD21 (n = 8 each) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | PD3 | Etoposide | Protection from hair loss at wound site |
| b | Cyclophosphamide | ||
| c | Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin | ||
| d | No injection | No hair loss | |
| e | PD8 | Etoposide | Total alopecia on trunk |
| f | Cyclophosphamide | ||
| g | Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin | ||
| h | PD11 | Etoposide | Total alopecia on trunk |
| i | Cyclophosphamide | ||
| j | Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin | ||
| k | Unwounded | Etoposide | Total alopecia on trunk |
| l | Cyclophosphamide | ||
| m | Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin |
Effects of subcutaneously injected cytokines and growth factors on chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Of the six cytokines and growth factors injected subcutaneously, protection from CIA was only observed in IL-1β treated rats, regardless of the different chemotherapy regimens.
| Group | Injected Cytokine/growth factor (PD3) | Chemotherapy | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IFN-γ | Etoposide | Alopecia |
| 2 | TNF-α | Etoposide | Alopecia |
| 3 | EGF | Etoposide | Alopecia |
| 4 | FGF | Etoposide | Alopecia |
| 5 | TGF-β | Etoposide | Alopecia |
| 6 | PBS (vehicle) | Etoposide | Alopecia |
| 7 | IL-1β | Etoposide | Local protection of hair loss |
| 8 | Cyclophosphamide | ||
| 9 | Cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin | ||
| 10 | No injection | No chemotherapy | Normal hair phenotype |
Fig. 2Hair follicles (HFs) immediately adjacent to the wound site were at different phases of the hair cycle from HFs in unwounded skin. Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed HFs immediately adjacent to the wound site (B, D, F) were of delayed anagen stage compared with skin from unwounded pups (A, C, E). All pups received etoposide on PD11-13. Blue arrows point to the hair bulbs.
Fig. 3Strongly induced cytokine and chemokine gene expression in wounded skin 36 h post wounding. (A) Gene expression signature in wounded rat skin differed from the control unwounded skin, as indicated by hierarchical cluster analysis of microarray data. (B) A set of genes that were up-regulated (red) or down-regulated (green) by more than two folds in wounded skin compared with unwounded skin. (C) Quantitative real-time qPCR analysis confirmed increased expression of Cxcl2, Osteopontin, and IL-1β, and decreased expression of Ccl24, in wounded skin compared with unwounded skin, normalized to Gapdh expression. Bars = SD. (D) IL-1β was highly expressed 24 h post wounding in both anagen (n = 7) and telogen mouse skin (n = 9) (p = 0.11). Bars = SEM.
Fig. 4Local IL-1β is necessary and sufficient to protect from CIA by retarding HF morphogenesis. (A) Gross phenotype of IL-1β and vehicle pre-treated rats after etoposide treatment on PD21 (n = 6 each). (B–E) H&E staining (B, C) and quantitative HF staging (D, E) showed delayed HF cycling in IL-1β treated rats on PD13 compared with vehicle treated controls. Many fewer HFs were of stage VIII in IL-1β treated compared with control skin (D). Table shows the mean and SEM values of percentages of HFs at different stages. N = 5 each. This observation was confirmed by the lower HF morphogenesis score in IL-1β treated skin (E). Error bars = SEM. (F–H) Giemsa staining (F, G) and semi-quantitative histomorphometry (H) showed increased mast cell degranulation in IL-1β treated skin. Arrows point at mast cells (F, G). Insets show intact (in F) and degranulated (in G) mast cells. Error bars = SEM. (I–K) Gross phenotype (I) and H&E staining (J, K) showed that IL-1β neutralizing antibody (Ab) injection at the wound site inhibited hair re-growth after etoposide treatment. Block arrow points to lack of hair regrowth (I) and HF structures (K) at IL-1β antibody injected wound site, and arrows point to HFs in the vehicle injected wound site (J) (n = 6 each).