Literature DB >> 28607175

Environmental factors explain socioeconomic prevalence differences in myopia in 6-year-old children.

J Willem L Tideman1,2, Jan Roelof Polling1,3, Albert Hofman2, Vincent Wv Jaddoe2,4, Johan P Mackenbach5, Caroline Cw Klaver1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High myopia (≤-6 D) usually has its onset before 10 years of age and can lead to blinding complications later in life. We examined whether differences in myopia prevalences in socioeconomic risk groups could be explained by differences in lifestyle factors.
METHODS: A total of 5711 six-year-old children participating in the prospective population-based birth cohort study Generation R underwent a stepwise ophthalmic examination, which included visual acuity and objective cycloplegic refraction to identify children with myopia (≤-0.5D). Daily activities, ethnicity, factors representing family socioeconomic status and housing were ascertained by questionnaire. Risk assessments of myopia and mediation analyses were performed using logistic regression; attenuation of risks was calculated by bootstrapping.
RESULTS: Prevalence of myopia was 2.4% (n=137). Myopic children spent more time indoors and less outdoors than non-myopic children (p<0.01), had lower vitamin D (p=0.01), had a higher body mass index and participated less in sports (p=0.03). Children of non-European descent (OR 2.60; 95% CI 1.84 to 3.68), low maternal education (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.57 to 3.28) and low family income (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.8 to 3.74) were more often myopic. Lifestyle factors explained the majority of the increased risk for ethnicity (82%; 95% CI 55 to 120), maternal education (69%; 95% CI 45 to 109) and family socioeconomic status (71%; 95% CI 46 to 104).
CONCLUSION: This study found environmental factors to be strong risk factors for myopia already at the age of 6 years. The myopia prevalence differences in socioeconomic groups were greatly determined by differences in distribution of these environmental risk factors, highlighting the importance of lifestyle adjustments in young children developing myopia. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; lifestyle; mediation; myopia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28607175     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  22 in total

1.  The diluted atropine for inhibition of myopia progression in Korean children.

Authors:  Ji-Sun Moon; Sun Young Shin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Myopia progression from wearing first glasses to adult age: the DREAM Study.

Authors:  Jan Roelof Polling; Caroline Klaver; Jan Willem Tideman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.908

3.  Mental health status of parents of young patients with high myopia.

Authors:  Li-Yun Guo; Heng Sun; Min Hu; Yun-Hai Jiang; Zhi-Hang Luo
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children.

Authors:  Jan Willem Lodewijk Tideman; Jan Roelof Polling; Johannes R Vingerling; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cathy Williams; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Caroline C W Klaver
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Growth in foetal life, infancy, and early childhood and the association with ocular biometry.

Authors:  Jan Willem L Tideman; Jan Roelof Polling; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Piotr Kanclerz; Kazuo Tsubota; Carla Lanca; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  The distribution of refraction by age and gender in a non-myopic Chinese children population aged 6-12 years.

Authors:  Xiyan Zhang; Yonglin Zhou; Jie Yang; Yan Wang; Wenyi Yang; Liuwei Gao; Yao Xiang; Fengyun Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Impact of COVID-19 Home Confinement in Children's Refractive Errors.

Authors:  Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Clara Martinez-Perez; Cesar Villa-Collar; Cristina Andreu-Vázquez; Alicia Ruiz-Pomeda; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The associations of high academic performance with childhood ametropia prevalence and myopia development in China.

Authors:  Yahan Yang; Ruiyang Li; Daniel Ting; Xiaohang Wu; Jialing Huang; Yi Zhu; Chuan Chen; Bingsen Lin; Sijin Li; Xinliang Zhang; Kexin Chen; Tongyong Yu; Dongxuan Wu; Zijun Mo; Hongxi Wang; Shiqun Li; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

10.  Evidence That Emmetropization Buffers Against Both Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Myopia.

Authors:  Alfred Pozarickij; Clair A Enthoven; Neema Ghorbani Mojarrad; Denis Plotnikov; Milly S Tedja; Annechien E G Haarman; J Willem L Tideman; Jan Roelof Polling; Kate Northstone; Cathy Williams; Caroline C W Klaver; Jeremy A Guggenheim
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.