Kush R Desai1, James L Laws1, Riad Salem1, Samdeep K Mouli1, Martin F Errea1, Jennifer K Karp1, Yihe Yang1, Robert K Ryu1, Robert J Lewandowski2. 1. From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (K.R.D., J.L.L., R.S., S.K.M., M.F.E., J.K.K., Y.Y., R.J.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (R.K.R.). 2. From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (K.R.D., J.L.L., R.S., S.K.M., M.F.E., J.K.K., Y.Y., R.J.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (R.K.R.). r-lewandowski@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite growth in placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters, retrieval rates remain low. Filters with extended implantation times present a challenge to retrieval, where standard techniques often fail. The development of advanced retrieval techniques has positively impacted retrieval of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with prolonged dwell times; however, there is no precise definition of the time point when advanced techniques become necessary. We aim to define prolonged retrievable inferior vena cava filters dwell time by determining the inflection point when the risk of standard retrieval technique failure increases significantly, necessitating advanced retrieval techniques to maintain overall technical success of retrieval. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2009 to April 2015, 762 retrieval procedures were identified from a prospectively acquired database. We assessed patient age/sex, filter dwell time, procedural technical success, the use of advanced techniques, and procedure-related adverse events. Overall retrieval success rate was 98% (n=745). When standard retrieval techniques failed, advanced techniques were used; this was necessary 18% of the time (n=138). Logistic regression identified that dwell time was the only risk factor for failure of standard retrieval technique (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.10; P<0.001). Spline function regression analysis demonstrated that if dwell time exceeded 7 months, the risk of standard technique failure was 40.9%. Adverse events occurred at a rate of 2% (n=18; 15 minor and 3 major). CONCLUSIONS: The necessity of advanced techniques to maintain technical success of retrieval increases with dwell time. Patients with retrievable inferior vena cava filters in place beyond 7 months may benefit from referral to centers with expertise in advanced filter retrieval.
BACKGROUND: Despite growth in placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters, retrieval rates remain low. Filters with extended implantation times present a challenge to retrieval, where standard techniques often fail. The development of advanced retrieval techniques has positively impacted retrieval of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with prolonged dwell times; however, there is no precise definition of the time point when advanced techniques become necessary. We aim to define prolonged retrievable inferior vena cava filters dwell time by determining the inflection point when the risk of standard retrieval technique failure increases significantly, necessitating advanced retrieval techniques to maintain overall technical success of retrieval. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2009 to April 2015, 762 retrieval procedures were identified from a prospectively acquired database. We assessed patient age/sex, filter dwell time, procedural technical success, the use of advanced techniques, and procedure-related adverse events. Overall retrieval success rate was 98% (n=745). When standard retrieval techniques failed, advanced techniques were used; this was necessary 18% of the time (n=138). Logistic regression identified that dwell time was the only risk factor for failure of standard retrieval technique (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.10; P<0.001). Spline function regression analysis demonstrated that if dwell time exceeded 7 months, the risk of standard technique failure was 40.9%. Adverse events occurred at a rate of 2% (n=18; 15 minor and 3 major). CONCLUSIONS: The necessity of advanced techniques to maintain technical success of retrieval increases with dwell time. Patients with retrievable inferior vena cava filters in place beyond 7 months may benefit from referral to centers with expertise in advanced filter retrieval.
Authors: Reza Seifabadi; William F Pritchard; Shelby Leonard; Ivane Bakhutashvili; David L Woods; Juan A Esparza-Trujillo; John W Karanian; Bradford J Wood Journal: J Eng Sci Med Diagn Ther Date: 2019-06-12
Authors: Kush R Desai; Nicholas Xiao; Riad Salem; Jennifer K Karp; Robert K Ryu; Robert J Lewandowski Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 5.501