S Kinouani1, H de Lary de Latour2, J-P Joseph2, L Letrilliart3. 1. Inserm, UMR 1219, team HEALTHY, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Department of general practice, university of Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: sherazade.kinouani@u-bordeaux.fr. 2. Department of general practice, university of Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France. 3. Collège universitaire de médecine générale, université de Lyon 1, 69000 Lyon, France; Health Service and Performance Research (HESPER), université de Lyon, 69000 Lyon, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the diagnostic management procedures for detection of urinary tract infections in general practice and their correlated factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from the ECOGEN study on urinary tract infections, collected in France between November 2011 and April 2012. This national cross-sectional study was carried out in general practices. Data was coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care. RESULTS: A total of 340 consultations or home visits were held for urinary tract infections. The five most frequent diagnostic procedures were (in descending order) clinical examination (67.6%), urine cytobacteriological examination (UCBE) (47.9%), urine dipstick test (15.6%), blood test (8.5%), and imaging (6.5%). No urine dipstick test or UCBE was performed in 43% of cases. Factors correlated with diagnostic procedures were age and gender of patients, annual number of consultations held by family physicians, and duration of consultation. CONCLUSION: Family physicians did not comply with guidelines on diagnostic management for detection of urinary tract infections. We hypothesized that this non-compliance could be due to the family physicians' environment and characteristics, and to clinical practice guidelines.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe the diagnostic management procedures for detection of urinary tract infections in general practice and their correlated factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from the ECOGEN study on urinary tract infections, collected in France between November 2011 and April 2012. This national cross-sectional study was carried out in general practices. Data was coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care. RESULTS: A total of 340 consultations or home visits were held for urinary tract infections. The five most frequent diagnostic procedures were (in descending order) clinical examination (67.6%), urine cytobacteriological examination (UCBE) (47.9%), urine dipstick test (15.6%), blood test (8.5%), and imaging (6.5%). No urine dipstick test or UCBE was performed in 43% of cases. Factors correlated with diagnostic procedures were age and gender of patients, annual number of consultations held by family physicians, and duration of consultation. CONCLUSION: Family physicians did not comply with guidelines on diagnostic management for detection of urinary tract infections. We hypothesized that this non-compliance could be due to the family physicians' environment and characteristics, and to clinical practice guidelines.