Literature DB >> 28606620

Efficacy and safety of lumacaftor and ivacaftor in patients aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del-CFTR: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

Felix Ratjen1, Christopher Hug2, Gautham Marigowda2, Simon Tian2, Xiaohong Huang2, Sanja Stanojevic3, Carlos E Milla4, Paul D Robinson5, David Waltz2, Jane C Davies6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumacaftor and ivacaftor combination treatment showed efficacy in patients aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del-cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in placebo-controlled studies and patients aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del-CFTR in an open-label study. We report efficacy and safety of lumacaftor and ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis aged 6-11 years homozygous for F508del-CFTR.
METHODS: In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, patients were enrolled at 54 hospitals and medical centres in nine countries (the USA, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Sweden, and the UK). Eligible patients weighed at least 15 kg, with a confirmed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 70 or more, and lung clearance index2·5 (LCI2·5) of 7·5 or more at screening (values less than these thresholds were permitted at day 1). All patients were tested for CFTR genotype at screening; eligible patients had to have the F508del-CFTR mutation on both alleles. Exclusion criteria included any comorbidity or laboratory abnormality that might confound the study results or pose additional risk to the patient. Patients were stratified by weight (<25 kg vs ≥25 kg) and ppFEV1 severity (<90 vs ≥90) determined at the screening visit, and randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment using an interactive web response system to receive 200 mg lumacaftor and 250 mg ivacaftor every 12 hours or placebo for 24 weeks. Patients, all site personnel including the investigator and the site monitor, and the study team were blinded, with the exception of site personnel needing this information in the event of medical emergency or pregnancy and patient safety and regulatory affairs personnel to meet serious adverse event reporting requirements. The primary endpoint was the mean absolute change in LCI2·5 from all on-treatment study visits up to and including week 24. All randomly assigned patients who were exposed to any amount of study drug, with treatment assignment as assigned were included in primary and other efficacy analyses. All patients who were exposed to any amount of study drug, with treatment assignment as treated, were included in the safety analysis. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02514473.
FINDINGS: Between July 23, 2015, and Sept 20, 2016, a total of 206 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive lumacaftor and ivacaftor (n=104) or placebo (n=102). Two randomly assigned patients were never dosed with study drug (one in the placebo arm due to ineligibility arising from a streptococcal throat infection and one in the lumacaftor and ivacaftor arm due to withdrawal based on refusal to provide blood tests) and were not included in the analyses. 103 patients received at least one dose of lumacaftor and ivacaftor and 101 patients received at least one dose of placebo. For the primary endpoint, the average absolute change in LCI2·5 from baseline over all study visits up to and including the week 24 visit, least squares mean difference was -1·09 units (95% CI -1·43 to -0·75, p<0·0001) for lumacaftor and ivacaftor versus placebo. For the key secondary endpoint of sweat chloride concentration, the least squares mean difference versus placebo was -20·8 mmol/L (95% CI -23·4 to -18·2, average absolute change at day 15/week 4; p<0·0001). The least squares mean difference compared with placebo in absolute change in ppFEV1 from all on-treatment study visits until week 24 was 2·4 (95% CI 0·4-4·4, p=0·0182). 196 (96%) of 204 patients reported adverse events, most of which were mild (87 [43%]) or moderate (98 [48%]). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in three (3%) of 103 patients in the lumacaftor and ivacaftor group and two (2%) of 101 patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in 13 (13%) of 103 patients in the lumacaftor and ivacaftor group and 11 (11%) of 101 patients in the placebo group.
INTERPRETATION: Treatment with lumacaftor and ivacaftor was associated with statistically significant improvements in lung function, as measured by LCI2·5 and ppFEV1, versus placebo in patients aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del-CFTR. The overall safety profile was consistent with previous phase 3 studies of lumacaftor and ivacaftor. FUNDING: Vertex Pharmaceuticals.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28606620     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30215-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  65 in total

Review 1.  Building global development strategies for cf therapeutics during a transitional cftr modulator era.

Authors:  N Mayer-Hamblett; S van Koningsbruggen-Rietschel; D P Nichols; D R VanDevanter; J C Davies; T Lee; A G Durmowicz; F Ratjen; M W Konstan; K Pearson; S C Bell; J P Clancy; J L Taylor-Cousar; K De Boeck; S H Donaldson; D G Downey; P A Flume; P Drevinek; C H Goss; I Fajac; A S Magaret; B S Quon; S M Singleton; J M VanDalfsen; G Z Retsch-Bogart
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Current Status and Future Opportunities in Lung Precision Medicine Research with a Focus on Biomarkers. An American Thoracic Society/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Research Statement.

Authors:  Ann Chen Wu; James P Kiley; Patricia J Noel; Shashi Amur; Esteban G Burchard; John P Clancy; Joshua Galanter; Maki Inada; Tiffanie K Jones; Jonathan A Kropski; James E Loyd; Lawrence M Nogee; Benjamin A Raby; Angela J Rogers; David A Schwartz; Don D Sin; Avrum Spira; Scott T Weiss; Lisa R Young; Blanca E Himes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Safety and efficacy of treatment with lumacaftor in combination with ivacaftor in younger patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Pi Chun Cheng; Stamatia Alexiou; Ronald C Rubenstein
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 4.  The safety of lumacaftor and ivacaftor for the treatment of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Maria Talamo Guevara; Susanna A McColley
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.250

Review 5.  Potentiators and Correctors in Paediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  R Dobra; C Edmondson; D Hughes; I Martin; J C Davies
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Ion Channel Modulators in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Martina Gentzsch; Marcus A Mall
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Correctors (specific therapies for class II CFTR mutations) for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Kevin W Southern; Sanjay Patel; Ian P Sinha; Sarah J Nevitt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-02

Review 8.  [Evidence-based treatment of cystic fibrosis].

Authors:  F C Ringshausen; T Hellmuth; A-M Dittrich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 9.  CFTR modulator theratyping: Current status, gaps and future directions.

Authors:  John Paul Clancy; Calvin U Cotton; Scott H Donaldson; George M Solomon; Donald R VanDevanter; Michael P Boyle; Martina Gentzsch; Jerry A Nick; Beate Illek; John C Wallenburg; Eric J Sorscher; Margarida D Amaral; Jeffrey M Beekman; Anjaparavanda P Naren; Robert J Bridges; Philip J Thomas; Garry Cutting; Steven Rowe; Anthony G Durmowicz; Martin Mense; Kris D Boeck; William Skach; Christopher Penland; Elizabeth Joseloff; Hermann Bihler; John Mahoney; Drucy Borowitz; Katherine L Tuggle
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Brushed nasal epithelial cells are a surrogate for bronchial epithelial CFTR studies.

Authors:  John J Brewington; Erin T Filbrandt; F J LaRosa; Jessica D Moncivaiz; Alicia J Ostmann; Lauren M Strecker; John P Clancy
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.