Wen-Chun Yang1, Tsui-Chun Hsu2, Kuan-Chen Cheng3,4,5, Je-Ruei Liu6,7,8. 1. Graduate Institute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. 2. Department of Animal Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. 3. Graduate Institute of Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. kccheng@ntu.edu.tw. 4. Institute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. kccheng@ntu.edu.tw. 5. Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan. kccheng@ntu.edu.tw. 6. Department of Animal Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. jrliu@ntu.edu.tw. 7. Institute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan. jrliu@ntu.edu.tw. 8. Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. jrliu@ntu.edu.tw.
Erratum to: Microb Cell Fact (2017) 16:69 DOI 10.1186/s12934-017-0687-8
The original version of this article [1] contained the following errors that, unfortunately, could not be corrected in time before online publication.The ‘Adhesion ability of L. reuteri pNZ-zhd101’ of the ‘Results’ section erroneously read: “The mean fluorescence intensity of Caco-2 cells incubated with HI-stained L. reuteri Pg4 was significantly greater than that of Caco-2 cells alone (15.53 ± 1.50 vs. 0.42 ± 0.11)…”.The sentence should instead read: “The mean fluorescence intensity of Caco-2 cells incubated with HI-stained L. reuteri Pg4 was significantly greater than that of Caco-2 cells alone (15.53 ± 1.50 vs. 0.32 ± 0.09)”.The fourth paragraph of the ‘Discussion’ section erroneously read: “In this study, all three L. reuteri Pg4 strains survived after an incubation period of 4 h at pH 3.0 or 10 h in MRS broth containing 0.5% ox gall.The sentence should instead read: “In this study, all three L. reuteri Pg4 strains survived after an incubation period of 4 h at pH 3.0 or 24 h in MRS broth containing 0.5% ox gall”.The second and third paragraphs of the ‘Discussion’ section erroneously cited Fig. 2. The correct citation is to Fig. 3. As a result, all subsequent figure citations were also incorrect and had to be renumbered.The above errors have been corrected in the original article.