| Literature DB >> 28605892 |
Fatemeh Jahanbakhsh Sefidi1, Homan Kaghazian2, Gholam Ali Moradli1, Seyed Mehdi Hassanzadeh2.
Abstract
BAckground: Thermal stability (TS) is a part of the BCG vaccine characterization by which the consistency of process in BCG vaccine production could be confirmed. To enhance the TS of the vaccine, some prevalent stabilizers in different concentrations were added to the final formulation of BCG bulk prior to Freeze-drying process. We found a formulation more effective than the current stabilizer for retaining the higher viability of lyophilized BCG vaccine produced by Pasteur Institute of Iran.Entities:
Keywords: BCG vaccine; Quality control; Stability
Year: 2017 PMID: 28605892 PMCID: PMC5572437 DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.ibj.21.6.406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Biomed J ISSN: 1028-852X
Levels assigned to the factors studied according to the L16 Taguchi array and concentration of stabilizers & response values for the CFUs
| Trial | Factors and levels | CFU×10^6/mg | Thermal stability | S/N | STD | Mean | CV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | G | D | L | T | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 4 | 6.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.05 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 7 | 12 | 0.2 | 3.8 | 0.04 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 17 | 18 | 0.2 | 8.1 | 0.02 |
| 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8.9 | 8.8 | 9.3 | 17 | 19 | 0.3 | 9 | 0.03 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 19 | 20 | 0.3 | 9.7 | 0.03 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 18 | 21 | 0.6 | 11.2 | 0.05 |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 16 | 18 | 0.2 | 8.1 | 0.02 |
| 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8.4 | 8 | 7.8 | 15 | 18 | 0.3 | 8 | 0.04 |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 22 | 0.3 | 12 | 0.02 |
| 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 26 | 24 | 0.4 | 16.2 | 0.02 |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 21 | 22 | 0.2 | 12 | 0.02 |
| 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 21 | 0.5 | 11.2 | 0.04 |
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 8.7 | 15 | 18 | 0.5 | 8.2 | 0.05 |
| 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 6.3 | 5.5 | 11 | 15 | 0.4 | 5.9 | 0.07 |
| 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 9 | 15 | 0.3 | 5.5 | 0.05 |
| 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 10 | 14 | 0.2 | 5 | 0.04 |
N, sodium L-glutamate; G, glucose (+D); D, dextran 40; L, lactose (+D); T, trehalose; S/N, signal-to-noise; STD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient variation
Taguchi analysis for CFU versus G, L, T, D, N, and the main effect for signal-to-noise ratio and mean
| Level 1 | Signal-to-noise ratio | Mean | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | L | T | D | N | G | L | T | D | N | |
| 1 | 25.76 | 29.13 | 27.70 | 27.62 | 28.19 | 21.50 | 34.25 | 29.17 | 28.33 | 31.33 |
| 2 | 31.50 | 30.04 | 29.76 | 30.09 | 29.24 | 37.75 | 35.00 | 32.92 | 33.67 | 31.50 |
| 3 | 33.88 | 30.55 | 30.57 | 30.96 | 31.25 | 49.83 | 34.83 | 35.33 | 37.92 | 37.00 |
| 4 | 28.19 | 29.60 | 31.30 | 30.65 | 30.64 | 26.50 | 31.50 | 38.17 | 35.67 | 35.75 |
| Delta | 8.11 | 1.42 | 3.59 | 3.34 | 3.06 | 28.33 | 3.50 | 9.00 | 9.58 | 5.67 |
| Rank | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
G, glucose; L, lactose; T, trehalose; D, dextrin; N, monosodium glutamate