Literature DB >> 28605699

Intergroup visual perspective-taking: Shared group membership impairs self-perspective inhibition but may facilitate perspective calculation.

Austin J Simpson1, Andrew R Todd2.   

Abstract

Reasoning about what other people see, know, and want is essential for navigating social life. Yet, even neurodevelopmentally healthy adults make perspective-taking errors. Here, we examined how the group membership of perspective-taking targets (ingroup vs. outgroup) affects processes underlying visual perspective-taking. In three experiments using two bases of group identity (university affiliation and minimal groups), interference from one's own differing perspective (i.e., egocentric intrusion) was stronger when responding from an ingroup versus an outgroup member's perspective. Spontaneous perspective calculation, as indexed by interference from another's visual perspective when reporting one's own (i.e., altercentric intrusion), did not differ across target group membership in any of our experiments. Process-dissociation analyses, which aim to isolate automatic processes underlying altercentric-intrusion effects, further revealed negligible effects of target group membership on perspective calculation. Meta-analytically, however, there was suggestive evidence that shared group membership facilitates responding from others' perspectives when self and other perspectives are aligned.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Egocentrism; Intergroup bias; Perspective-taking; Process dissociation; Theory of mind

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28605699     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  6 in total

1.  Visual perspective-taking in complex natural scenes.

Authors:  Paola Del Sette; Markus Bindemann; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.138

2.  Does social distance modulate adults' egocentric biases when reasoning about false beliefs?

Authors:  Benjamin G Farrar; Ljerka Ostojić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Implicit Mentalising during Level-1 Visual Perspective-Taking Indicated by Dissociation with Attention Orienting.

Authors:  Mark R Gardner; Aiste P Bileviciute; Caroline J Edmonds
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-20

4.  Tracking developmental differences in real-world social attention across adolescence, young adulthood and older adulthood.

Authors:  Martina De Lillo; Rebecca Foley; Matthew C Fysh; Aimée Stimson; Elisabeth E F Bradford; Camilla Woodrow-Hill; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-05-13

5.  Emotion and liking: how director emotional expression and knowledge of (dis)liking may impact adults' ability to follow the instructions of an ignorant speaker.

Authors:  Rebecca L Monk; Lauren Colbert; Gemma Darker; Jade Cowling; Bethany Jones; Adam W Qureshi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-11-19

6.  Age of avatar modulates the altercentric bias in a visual perspective-taking task: ERP and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Heather J Ferguson; Victoria E A Brunsdon; Elisabeth E F Bradford
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.