Literature DB >> 28605603

Efficacy and Safety of Degludec versus Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes.

Steven P Marso1, Darren K McGuire1, Bernard Zinman1, Neil R Poulter1, Scott S Emerson1, Thomas R Pieber1, Richard E Pratley1, Poul-Martin Haahr1, Martin Lange1, Kirstine Brown-Frandsen1, Alan Moses1, Simon Skibsted1, Kajsa Kvist1, John B Buse1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Degludec is an ultralong-acting, once-daily basal insulin that is approved for use in adults, adolescents, and children with diabetes. Previous open-label studies have shown lower day-to-day variability in the glucose-lowering effect and lower rates of hypoglycemia among patients who received degludec than among those who received basal insulin glargine. However, data are lacking on the cardiovascular safety of degludec.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 7637 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive either insulin degludec (3818 patients) or insulin glargine U100 (3819 patients) once daily between dinner and bedtime in a double-blind, treat-to-target, event-driven cardiovascular outcomes trial. The primary composite outcome in the time-to-event analysis was the first occurrence of an adjudicated major cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.3. Adjudicated severe hypoglycemia, as defined by the American Diabetes Association, was the prespecified, multiplicity-adjusted secondary outcome.
RESULTS: Of the patients who underwent randomization, 6509 (85.2%) had established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both. At baseline, the mean age was 65.0 years, the mean duration of diabetes was 16.4 years, and the mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin level was 8.4±1.7%; 83.9% of the patients were receiving insulin. The primary outcome occurred in 325 patients (8.5%) in the degludec group and in 356 (9.3%) in the glargine group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.06; P<0.001 for noninferiority). At 24 months, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was 7.5±1.2% in each group, whereas the mean fasting plasma glucose level was significantly lower in the degludec group than in the glargine group (128±56 vs. 136±57 mg per deciliter, P<0.001). Prespecified adjudicated severe hypoglycemia occurred in 187 patients (4.9%) in the degludec group and in 252 (6.6%) in the glargine group, for an absolute difference of 1.7 percentage points (rate ratio, 0.60; P<0.001 for superiority; odds ratio, 0.73; P<0.001 for superiority). Rates of adverse events did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events, degludec was noninferior to glargine with respect to the incidence of major cardiovascular events. (Funded by Novo Nordisk and others; DEVOTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01959529 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28605603      PMCID: PMC5731244          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  22 in total

1.  Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady-state conditions in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  T Heise; L Hermanski; L Nosek; A Feldman; S Rasmussen; H Haahr
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.577

2.  On looking at subgroups.

Authors:  Janet Wittes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Franklin J Zieve; Jennifer Marks; Stephen N Davis; Rodney Hayward; Stuart R Warren; Steven Goldman; Madeline McCarren; Mary Ellen Vitek; William G Henderson; Grant D Huang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Hertzel C Gerstein; Michael E Miller; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; J Thomas Bigger; John B Buse; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Denise G Simons-Morton; William T Friedewald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Leszek Nosek; Birgitte Biilmann Rønn; Lars Endahl; Lutz Heinemann; Christoph Kapitza; Eberhard Draeger
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 7.  Comparing the Clinical Outcomes Between Insulin-treated and Non-insulin-treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Krishna Munnee; Pravesh K Bundhun; Hongzhi Quan; Zhangui Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Impact of the mode of protraction of basal insulin therapies on their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and resulting clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Chantal Mathieu
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.577

9.  Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Seaquist; John Anderson; Belinda Childs; Philip Cryer; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Lisa Fish; Simon R Heller; Henry Rodriguez; James Rosenzweig; Robert Vigersky
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Hypoglycaemia risk with insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in type 2 and type 1 diabetes: a pre-planned meta-analysis of phase 3 trials.

Authors:  R E Ratner; S C L Gough; C Mathieu; S Del Prato; B Bode; H Mersebach; L Endahl; B Zinman
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 6.577

View more
  146 in total

Review 1.  Glucose-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Salvatore Carbone; Dave L Dixon; Leo F Buckley; Antonio Abbate
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Insulin-induced vascular redox dysregulation in human atherosclerosis is ameliorated by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibition.

Authors:  Ioannis Akoumianakis; Ileana Badi; Gillian Douglas; Surawee Chuaiphichai; Laura Herdman; Nadia Akawi; Marios Margaritis; Alexios S Antonopoulos; Evangelos K Oikonomou; Costas Psarros; Nikolaos Galiatsatos; Dimitris Tousoulis; Attila Kardos; Rana Sayeed; George Krasopoulos; Mario Petrou; Uwe Schwahn; Paulus Wohlfart; Norbert Tennagels; Keith M Channon; Charalambos Antoniades
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Cardiovascular Outcome Trials with Glucose-Lowering Drugs.

Authors:  Tina K Thethi; Anika Bilal; Richard E Pratley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Pharmacological Agents Utilized in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes: Beyond Lowering A1c.

Authors:  Joanna W Chung; Melody L Hartzler; Ashley Smith; Jessica Hatton; Kristi Kelley
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  Pharmacological Prevention of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus: Established and Emerging Agents.

Authors:  David R Saxon; Neda Rasouli; Robert H Eckel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  From glucose lowering agents to disease/diabetes modifying drugs: a "SIMPLE" approach for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Ofri Mosenzon; Stefano Del Prato; Meir Schechter; Lawrence A Leiter; Antonio Ceriello; Ralph A DeFronzo; Itamar Raz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 9.951

7.  Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: It is common, so what strategies can minimize the risk?

Authors:  Marlys LeBras; Tessa Laubscher
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering medications: an update.

Authors:  Philip Home
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 9.  Availability and Affordability of Essential Medicines: Implications for Global Diabetes Treatment.

Authors:  David Beran; Margaret Ewen; Kasia Lipska; Irl B Hirsch; John S Yudkin
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.