| Literature DB >> 28605472 |
Roger C Tine1, Khadime Sylla1, Babacar T Faye1, Eugenie Poirot2, Fatou B Fall3, Doudou Sow1, Duolao Wang4, Magatte Ndiaye1, Jean Louis Ndiaye1, Babacar Faye1, Brian Greenwood5, Oumar Gaye1, Paul Milligan6.
Abstract
Introduction: More information is needed about the safety of low-dose primaquine in populations where G6PD deficiency is common.Entities:
Keywords: Senegal; hemoglobin; plasmodium; primaquine; safety
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28605472 PMCID: PMC5848230 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079
Figure 1.Trial profile. In sum, 128 patients were excluded. Reasons for noninclusion: 72: hemoglobin <8 g/dl; 7: intended to leave the study area; 15: did not confirm enrollment; 11: positive pregnancy test; 23: hyperparasitemia. Abbreviations: AL, artemether-lumefantrine; ASAQ, amodiaquine-artesunate; DHAPQ, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine; PQ, primaquine.
Baseline Characteristics of the Six Study Groups of Patients
| AL | AL + PQ | ASAQ | ASAQ + PQ | DHAPQ | DHAPQ + PQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. Enrolled | 51 | 51 | 49 | 47 | 39 | 37 |
| Male:Female | 37:14 | 38:13 | 36:11 | 36:11 | 31:8 | 26:11 |
| Age in years (range) | 28.7 (18–74) | 32.6 (18–68) | 29.0 (18–74) | 30.0 (18– 63) | 27.1 (18– 58) | 29.9 (18– 57) |
| Weight in kg (range) | 63.7 (45–86) | 67.0 (45–97) | 66.7 (46–111) | 65.1 (50–108) | 64.9 (43–90) | 63.9 (44–102) |
| Height in cm (range) | 176.1 (166–188) | 174.7 (160–195) | 175.1 (156–190) | 173.0 (156–188) | 174.6 (154–189) | 177.4 (161–188) |
| BMI | 20.6 (12.7–27.7) | 22.0 (16.2–33.6) | 21.9 (14.5–44.4) | 21.8 (16.4–34.1) | 21.0 (8.7–31.9) | 20.3 (13.7–29.2) |
| BMI < 18 | 24% | 7.8% | 18% | 17% | 21% | 24% |
| G6PD deficient | 16% | 20% | 20% | 30% | 15% | 16% |
| Geometric mean parasite density/μL (range) | 11 805 (1240–63 590) | 12 347 (1000–77 612) | 13 933 (1003–91 421) | 12 088 (1029–61 520) | 13 848 (1163–78 130) | 14 938 (1200–65 718) |
| Hb concentration g/dL | 13.1 (8.9–18.4) | 13.4 (8.9–18.0) | 13.9 (9.6–17.7) | 13.4 (8.7–18.2) | 13.4 (9.2–18.2) | 13.2 (8.8–16.7) |
| Anemia (Hb < 11 g/dL) | 12% | 10% | 6.1% | 13% | 18% | 11% |
Abbreviations: AL, artemether-lumefantrine; ASAQ, amodiaquine-artesunate; BMI, body mass index; DHAPQ, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine; PQ, primaquine.
Figure 2.Distribution of the primaquine dose administered to study participants (in mg/kg).
Mean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Day 0 to day 7
| ACT | ACT + PQ | Mean Difference*(95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL | ||||
| Day 0 | 13.1 | 13.4 | … | … |
| Day 7 | 11.9 | 11.9 | −0.23 (−0.68, 0.21) | .306 |
| ASAQ | ||||
| Day 0 | 13.9 | 13.4 | … | … |
| Day 7 | 12.1 | 11.8 | −0.02 (−0.49, 0.45) | .931 |
| DHAP | ||||
| Day 0 | 13.4 | 13.2 | … | … |
| Day 7 | 11.7 | 12.2 | 0.54 (0.03, 1.06) | .040 |
| Total | ||||
| Day 0 | 13.5 | 13.4 | … | … |
| Day 7 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 0.06 (−0.22, 0.33) | .681 |
Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin combination therapy; AL, artemether-lumefantrine; ASAQ, amodiaquine-artesunate; CI, confidence interval; DHAP, dihydroartemisinin; PQ, primaquine.
*Estimated from linear regression comparing day 7 concentration in each group, adjusted for Hemoglobin on day 0 as a covariate. P-values not adjusted for multiplicity of comparisons. A test of the interaction between ACT type and PQ gave P = .0728. A more detailed version of this table is provided in Table S2, Supplement.
Mean Hemoglobin Concentration at Each Time Point in Each Treatment Group, the Mean Change From Baseline, and the Difference Between Groups in the Change From Baseline Estimated From the Mixed Model
| Day | Mean Hemoglobin Concentration (SD) | Change From Baseline, Mean (SD) | Adjusted Difference between Groups in Change From Baseline (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACT | ACT + PQ | ACT | ACT + PQ | (ACT + PQ) − (ACT) |
| |
| 0 | 13.5 (1.82) | 13.4 (1.94) | … | … | … | … |
| 3 | 12.0 (1.65) | 12.0 (1.76) | −1.49 (1.35) | −1.33 (1.32) | 0.10 (−0.17, 0.37) | .474 |
| 7 | 11.9 (1.43) | 11.9 (1.65) | −1.54 (1.35) | −1.46 (1.47) | 0.04 (−0.23, 0.31) | .764 |
| 14 | 12.3 (1.49) | 12.3 (1.31) | −1.12 (1.66) | −1.06 (1.60) | 0.00 (−0.27, 0.27) | .996 |
| 21 | 12.8 (1.35) | 12.7 (1.24) | −0.70 (1.62) | −0.61 (1.50) | 0.03 (−0.24, 0.30) | .809 |
| 28 | 13.0 (1.28) | 13.1 (1.19) | −0.49 (1.60) | −0.30 (1.77) | 0.14 (−0.13, 0.41) | .314 |
Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin combination therapy; CI, confidence interval; PQ, primaquine; SD, standard deviation.
The Mean Hemoglobin Concentration in G6PD Deficient and Normal Patients at Each Time Point, the Mean and Range of the Change From Baseline, and the Adjusted Effect of Primaquine on the Change From Baseline Estimated From the Mixed Effects Model
| Day | G6PD | Mean Hb Concentration g/dL (SD) | Change From Baseline Mean (range) | Adjusted Difference in Change From Baseline (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status | ACT | ACT + PQ | ACT | ACT + PQ | (ACT + PQ) − (ACT) |
| |
| 0 | Normal | 13.5 (1.86) | 13.5 (1.95) | … | … | … | … |
| Deficient | 13.3 (1.66) | 13.0 (1.91) | |||||
| 3 | Normal | 12.0 (1.64) | 12.2 (1.76) | −1.47 (−6.4, +4.0) | −1.31 (−4.0, +2.1) | 0.15 (−0.15, 0.45) | .544 |
| Deficient | 11.7 (1.71) | 11.5 (1.70) | −1.62 (−4.8, +0.6) | −1.50 (−4.5, +1.3) | 0.00 (−0.61, 0.61) | ||
| 7 | Normal | 11.9 (1.37) | 12.1 (1.66) | −1.60 (−6.6, +1.4) | −1.36 (−4.7, +3.3) | 0.22 (−0.08, 0.52) | .010 |
| Deficient | 12.1 (1.68) | 11.2 (1.59) | −1.24 (−3.6, +1.7) | −1.75 (−6.1, +2.6) | −0.63 (−1.24, −0.03) | ||
| 14 | Normal | 12.4 (1.52) | 12.5 (1.29) | −1.09 (−5.9, +6.0) | −1.00 (−4.8, +4.0) | 0.07 (−0.23, 0.38) | .344 |
| Deficient | 12.1 (1.35) | 11.7 (1.21) | −1.23 (−3.6, +2.7) | −1.31 (−4.2, +2.1) | −0.20 (−0.81, 0.41) | ||
| 21 | Normal | 12.7 (1.36) | 12.8 (1.31) | −0.75 (−5.6, +3.6) | −0.70 (−4.2, +3.8) | 0.04 (−0.26, 0.34) | .694 |
| Deficient | 12.9 (1.35) | 12.6 (1.03) | −0.45 (−3.3, +4.7) | −0.36 (−2.9, +2.4) | −0.04 (−0.65, 0.57) | ||
| 28 | Normal | 13.0 (1.33) | 13.2 (1.26) | −0.51 (−5.0, +4.6) | −0.32 (−3.7, +4.8) | 0.18 (−0.13, 0.48) | .625 |
| Deficient | 13.0 (1.05) | 12.8 (0.87) | −0.38 (−2.8, +3.9) | −0.24 (−3.3, +3.0) | 0.01 (−0.60, 0.62) | ||
Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin combination therapy; CI, confidence interval; PQ, primaquine; SD, standard deviation.
a The P-value is from a test of interaction between G6PD status and treatment.
Figure 3.Mean hemoglobin concentration in G6PD deficient and normal patients who received primaquine or ACT alone. Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin combination therapy; PQ, primaquine.
Figure 4.Change in hemoglobin concentration by day 7 (Hb day 7-day 0) plotted against the concentration at baseline, for each group. Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin combination therapy; PQ, primaquine.
Figure 5.Gametocyte carriage over 28 days after treatment. A, Prevalence of gametocyte carriage. B, Arithmetic mean gametocyte density. Abbreviation: ACT, artemisinin combination therapy.
Gametocyte Carriage at Baseline and After Treatmenta
| Day | ACT (N = 139) | ACT + PQ (N = 135) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. Positive | Prevalence | Gametocyte Density | No. Positive | Prevalence | Gametocyte Density | |||
| Arithmetic Mean | Geometric Mean | Arithmetic Mean | Geometric Mean | |||||
| 0 | 11 | 7.9% | 32.9 | 347 | 9 | 6.7% | 27.2 | 357 |
| 1 | 11 | 7.9% | 27.1 | 260 | 8 | 5.9% | 10.8 | 160 |
| 2 | 11 | 7.9% | 12.9 | 107 | 8 | 5.9% | 4.8 | 64 |
| 3 | 10 | 7.2% | 7.0 | 59 | 4 | 3.0% | 1.7 | 46 |
| 7 | 8 | 5.8% | 4.1 | 51 | 2 | 1.5% | 0.5 | 32 |
| 14 | 7 | 5.0% | 2.4 | 39 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0 | … |
| 21 | 4 | 2.9% | 1.2 | 18 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0 | … |
| 28 | 1 | 0.7% | 0.2 | 24 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0 | … |
| Area under the curve | 1.08 | 106.7 | 0.29 | 29.5 | ||||
Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin combination therapy; PQ, primaquine.
aThe mean duration of gametocyte carriage was estimated as the area under the curve of gametocyte prevalence over time, i.e., ∑dij/ni where ni is the number of patients in group i and dij = ∑wtxtij, where xtij is the gametocyte status (0 or 1) at time t in patient j in group i, and the weightings wt are 0.25, 1, 1, 2.5, 5.5, 7, 10.5, and 7 for follow-up time points at 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. This is equivalent to plotting for each patient the gametocyte status (0 or 1) against time, connecting the points with straight lines, calculating the area under the resulting line, and then taking the mean area in each treatment group. The percentage efficacy against gametocyte carriage was calculated as 100×(1-R) where R is the ratio of the mean duration in the two treatment groups estimated using Poisson regression of dij on treatment group, using a robust standard error to calculate confidence intervals and P-values. A similar analysis was done, replacing the value of xtij with the gametocyte density in patient j in group i at time t, in order to estimate the effect of treatment on gametocyte density during the 28-day follow-up.