Susan D Birkhoff1, Suzanne C Smeltzer2. 1. Alpha Nu, Doctoral Candidate, Villanova University, College of Nursing, Villanova, PA, USA. 2. Alpha Nu, Director of Center for Nursing Research and Professor, Villanova University, College of Nursing, Villanova, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This integrative review presents a synthesis of the current qualitative research addressing the motivating factors, usability, and experiences of mobile health tracking applications (apps) across various chronic disease populations. DESIGN: Integrative review of the literature. METHODS: Databases used to conduct this integrative review included: PubMed Plus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, Science Direct, and EBSCO megafile. The following search terms were used in all five databases: smartphone apps, apps, mHealth, eHealth, mobile health apps, health tracking apps, user-centered apps, wireless technology, engagement, qualitative, and usability. FINDINGS: The initial literature review yielded 689 results. Once inclusion and exclusion criteria were employed, 11 studies met the criteria set forth for this review. The reviewed studies provided insight into users' perceptions, experiences, and motivations to incorporate smartphone mobile health apps into their daily lives when living with chronic illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates the growing interest in user-centered mobile health tracking apps, but with little understanding of motivating factors that foster sustained app use. Mobile health tracking apps targeted to users with chronic conditions need to have a high level of usability in order to motivate users to sustain engagement with their mobile health tracking app. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: User-centered mobile health tracking app technology is being used with increasing frequency to potentially provide individualized support to chronic illness populations.
PURPOSE: This integrative review presents a synthesis of the current qualitative research addressing the motivating factors, usability, and experiences of mobile health tracking applications (apps) across various chronic disease populations. DESIGN: Integrative review of the literature. METHODS: Databases used to conduct this integrative review included: PubMed Plus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, Science Direct, and EBSCO megafile. The following search terms were used in all five databases: smartphone apps, apps, mHealth, eHealth, mobile health apps, health tracking apps, user-centered apps, wireless technology, engagement, qualitative, and usability. FINDINGS: The initial literature review yielded 689 results. Once inclusion and exclusion criteria were employed, 11 studies met the criteria set forth for this review. The reviewed studies provided insight into users' perceptions, experiences, and motivations to incorporate smartphone mobile health apps into their daily lives when living with chronic illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates the growing interest in user-centered mobile health tracking apps, but with little understanding of motivating factors that foster sustained app use. Mobile health tracking apps targeted to users with chronic conditions need to have a high level of usability in order to motivate users to sustain engagement with their mobile health tracking app. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: User-centered mobile health tracking app technology is being used with increasing frequency to potentially provide individualized support to chronic illness populations.
Authors: J Murphy; T Uttamlal; K A Schmidtke; I Vlaev; D Taylor; M Ahmad; S Alsters; P Purkayastha; S Scholtz; R Ramezani; A R Ahmed; H Chahal; A Darzi; A I F Blakemore Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Katherine Hope Kenyon; Frederique Boonstra; Gustavo Noffs; Helmut Butzkueven; Adam P Vogel; Scott Kolbe; Anneke van der Walt Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 3.648
Authors: Lauretta E Grau; Kaitlyn Larkin; Chitra Lalloo; Jennifer N Stinson; William T Zempsky; Samuel A Ball; Frank D Buono Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: LaPrincess C Brewer; Jissy Cyriac; Ashok Kumbamu; Lora E Burke; Sarah Jenkins; Sharonne N Hayes; Clarence Jones; Lisa A Cooper; Christi A Patten Journal: Digit Health Date: 2022-07-18
Authors: EunKyo Kang; Sang Min Park; Kiheon Lee; Eun Bong Lee; Jae-Joon Yim; Jihye Lee; Soojeong Kim; Ye Eun Rhee; Young Ho Yun Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Karine Wendrich; Pim van Oirschot; Marijn Bart Martens; Marco Heerings; Peter Joseph Jongen; Lotte Krabbenborg Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2019 Nov-Dec
Authors: Meghan B Skiba; Elizabeth T Jacobs; Tracy E Crane; Lisa M Kopp; Cynthia A Thomson Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 1.757