| Literature DB >> 28604801 |
Meghnath Dhimal1, Khem Bahadur Karki1, Krishna Kumar Aryal1, Bimala Dhimal1, Hari Datt Joshi1, Sajan Puri1, Achyut Raj Pandey1, Purushotam Dhakal1, Arun Kumar Sharma2, Ganendra Bhakta Raya3, Imran Ansari4, David A Groneberg5, Ruth Müller5, Ulrich Kuch5.
Abstract
Young children are at greatest risk of exposure to lead and its effects. Although lead is one of the most widely used elements with known health hazard, there is little data on the blood lead level (BLL) of children in the Kathmandu Valley. Thus, this study aimed to assess factors associated with high BLL in children who were 6-36 months of age and resided in the Kathmandu Valley. In this hospital-based cross-sectional study 6-36 month-old children visiting the Paediatrics Outpatient Department of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Patan Hospital, and Siddhi Memorial Hospital were enrolled. All three hospitals are located in different areas inside the Kathmandu Valley. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents, and exposure data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Portable Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV) was used to determine BLLs in children. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Of 312 children enrolled in the study, 64.4% had BLLs ≥5μg/dl. A significant association was found between BLL and exposure to enamel paints in the household in the form of painting materials used in different parts of the house like walls, windows and doors (p = 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate analyses showed that BLLs were 4.5 times higher in children playing with dirt and dust (p = 0.006) and that children belonging to the community of lower caste/ethnicity groups had significantly higher BLLs compared to those from the upper caste groups (p = 0.02). Our study demonstrated that children living in households that have used enamel paints, children belonging to lower caste/ethnic groups, and children frequently playing with dirt and dust had significantly higher BLLs. The results of this study highlight the importance of policy decisions to limit environmental lead contamination, and to roll out awareness building measures designed to limit lead exposure and break the poverty cycle associated with chronic lead poisoning.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28604801 PMCID: PMC5467890 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Background characteristics of the study population.
| Variable | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| 6–12 months | 99 (31.7) |
| 13–24 months | 150 (48.1) |
| 25–36 months | 63 (20.2) |
| Male | 177 (56.7) |
| Female | 135 (43.3) |
| Upper caste groups | 62 (31.2) |
| Socially disadvantaged caste groups | 250 (68.8) |
| Literate | 302 (96.8) |
| Iliterate | 10 (3.2) |
| Literate | 278 (89.1) |
| Iliterate | 33 (10.6) |
| Agriculture | 28 (9.1) |
| Own business | 48 (15.6) |
| Service | 91 (29.5) |
| Student | 43 (14.0) |
| Other | 98 (31.8) |
| Housewife | 233 (75.2) |
| Agriculture | 13 (4.2) |
| Own business | 15 (4.8) |
| Service | 27 (8.7) |
| Other | 22 (8.7) |
| Already enrolled in nursery/school | 43 (13.7) |
| Not enrolled in nursery/school | 269 (86.3) |
Blood lead levels of the study population.
| Blood lead level (μg/dl) | Number of children (%) |
|---|---|
| 0–5 | 111 (35.6) |
| 5–10 | 124 (39.7) |
| 10–15 | 37 (11.9) |
| 15–20 | 15 (4.8) |
| 20–25 | 12 (3.8) |
| 25–30 | 6 (1.9) |
| 30–35 | 2 (0.6) |
| 35–40 | 3 (1) |
| 40–45 | 2 (0.6) |
| 0–45 | 312 (100) |
Factors associated with high blood lead levels.
| Variables | Blood lead level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–5 μg/dl | ≥ 5 μg/dl | Total | ||
| 0.2 | ||||
| Male | 58 (32.8) | 119 (67.2) | 177 (56.7) | |
| Female | 53 (39.2) | 82 (60.7) | 135 (43.3) | |
| 0.1 | ||||
| 6–12 months | 43 (38.7) | 56 (27.9) | 99 (33.3) | |
| 13–24 months | 46 (41.4) | 104 (51.7) | 150 (46.6) | |
| 25–36 months | 22 (19.8) | 41 (20.4) | 63 (20.1) | |
| 0.001 | ||||
| Upper caste | 59 (54.6) | 62 (31.2) | 121 (42.9) | |
| Other ethnic groups | 49 (45.4) | 137 (68.8) | 186 (57.1) | |
| Literate | 108 (97.3) | 194(96.5) | 302 (96.8) | 0.71 |
| Iliterate | 3 (2.7) | 7 (3.5) | 10 (3.2) | |
| Literate | 98 (88.3) | 180 (90) | 287 (89.4) | 0.63 |
| Iliterate | 13 (11.7) | 20 (10) | 33 (10.6) | |
| 0.2 | ||||
| Agriculture | 10 (9.2) | 18 (9.0) | 28 (9.1) | |
| Own business | 22 (20.2) | 26 (13.1) | 48 (15.6) | |
| Service | 30 (27.5) | 61 (30.7) | 91 (29.5) | |
| Student | 10 (9.2) | 33 (16.6) | 43 (14.0) | |
| Other | 37 (33.9) | 61 (30.7) | 98 (31.8) | |
| 0.4 | ||||
| Housewife | 85 (76.6) | 148 (74.4) | 233 (75.2) | |
| Agriculture | 3 (2.7) | 10 (5.0) | 13 (4.2) | |
| Own business | 4 (3.6) | 11 (5.5) | 15 (4.8) | |
| Service | 8 (7.2) | 19 (9.5) | 27 (8.7) | |
| Other | 11 (9.9) | 11 (5.5) | 22 (8.7) | |
| 0.003 | ||||
| Wall | 1 (1.1) | 18 (11.0) | 19 (6.05) | |
| Window and door | 55 (61.8) | 64 (39.3) | 119(50.55) | |
| Door and wall | 33 (37.1) | 81 (49.7) | 114 (43.4) | |
| 0.07 | ||||
| Yes | 10 (9.00) | 33 (16.4) | 43 (12.7) | |
| No | 101 (91.0) | 168 (83.6) | 269 (87.3) | |
| 0.8 | ||||
| Yes | 86 (98.9) | 161 (99.4) | 247 (99.15) | |
| No | 1 (1.1) | 1 (0.6) | 2 (0.86) | |
| 0.003 | ||||
| Yes | 12 (10.8) | 51 (25.5) | 63 (18.1) | |
| No | 99 (89.2) | 149 (74.5) | 248 (81.8) | |
| 0.0001 | ||||
| Yes | 24 (21.8) | 85 (42.9) | 109 (32.3) | |
| No | 86 (78.2) | 113 (57.1) | 199 (67.6) | |
| 0.4 | ||||
| Yes | 21 (19.1) | 46 (23.1) | 67 (21.1) | |
| No | 89 (80.9) | 153 (76.9) | 242 (78.9) | |
| 0.9 | ||||
| Yes | 84 (77.1) | 150 (76.9) | 234 (77) | |
| No | 25 (22.9) | 45 (23.1) | 70 (23) | |
| 0.1 | ||||
| Yes | 2 (1.8) | 11 (5.6) | 13 (3.7) | |
| No | 107 (98.2) | 187 (94.4) | 294 (96.3) | |
* Information on ethnicity was missing in five cases.
Association between blood lead level and variables in bivariate (crude odds ratio) and multivariate models (adjusted odds ratio).
| Variable | Crude odds ratio | Adjusted odds ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Upper caste ethnic group | 1 | 1 | ||
| Other ethnic groups | 2.66 (1.64–4.31) | 3.43 (1.16–10.12) | ||
| Children playing outdoors | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 2.82 (1.43–5.56) | 2.67 (0.74–9.58) | ||
| Children playing in dirt and dust | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 2.69 (1.58–4.59) | 4.53 (1.55–13.20) | ||
| Children eating dirt and dust | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 2.22 (0.95–5.18) | 1.41 (0.44–4.52) | ||
| Schooling of children | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.98 (0.94–4.20) | 3.45 (0.88–13.45) | ||
| Parts of house with enamel paints | ||||
| Door and window only | 1 | 1 | ||
| Window door and wall | 2.50(1.47–4.25) | 1.4 (0.50–3.94) | ||
| Peeling off paints from the wall | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 3.15 (0.68–14.46) | 1.29 (0.10–16.42) |