Sasha Herbst de Cortina1, Claire C Bristow, Romney Humphries, Silver Keith Vargas, Kelika A Konda, Carlos F Caceres, Jeffrey D Klausner. 1. From the *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; †Division of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; ‡Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; §Unit of Health, Sexuality and Human Development, and Laboratory of Sexual Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Miraflores, Lima, Peru; and ¶Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dual point-of-care tests for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Treponema pallidum allow for same-day testing and treatment and have been demonstrated to be cost-effective in preventing the adverse outcomes of HIV infection and syphilis. By recording and transmitting data as they are collected, electronic readers address challenges related to the decentralization of point-of-care testing. METHODS: We evaluated a smartphone-based electronic reader using 201 sera tested with 2 dual rapid tests for detection of antibodies to HIV and T. pallidum in Los Angeles, USA, and Lima, Peru. Tests were read both visually and with the electronic reader. Enzyme immunoassay followed by Western blot and T. pallidum particle agglutination were the reference tests for HIV and T. pallidum, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the 2 rapid tests for detection of HIV were 94.1% and 97.0% for electronic readings. Both tests had a specificity of 100% for detection of HIV by electronic reading. The sensitivities of the 2 rapid tests for detection of T. pallidum were 86.5% and 92.4% for electronic readings. The specificities for detection of T. pallidum were 99.1% and 99.0% by electronic reading. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of visual and electronic readings, and the performance did not differ between the 2 study sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the electronic reader to be a promising option for increasing the use of point-of-care testing programs.
BACKGROUND: Dual point-of-care tests for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Treponema pallidum allow for same-day testing and treatment and have been demonstrated to be cost-effective in preventing the adverse outcomes of HIV infection and syphilis. By recording and transmitting data as they are collected, electronic readers address challenges related to the decentralization of point-of-care testing. METHODS: We evaluated a smartphone-based electronic reader using 201 sera tested with 2 dual rapid tests for detection of antibodies to HIV and T. pallidum in Los Angeles, USA, and Lima, Peru. Tests were read both visually and with the electronic reader. Enzyme immunoassay followed by Western blot and T. pallidum particle agglutination were the reference tests for HIV and T. pallidum, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivities of the 2 rapid tests for detection of HIV were 94.1% and 97.0% for electronic readings. Both tests had a specificity of 100% for detection of HIV by electronic reading. The sensitivities of the 2 rapid tests for detection of T. pallidum were 86.5% and 92.4% for electronic readings. The specificities for detection of T. pallidum were 99.1% and 99.0% by electronic reading. There were no significant differences between the accuracies of visual and electronic readings, and the performance did not differ between the 2 study sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the electronic reader to be a promising option for increasing the use of point-of-care testing programs.
Authors: A Y Dagnra; S Dossim; M Salou; T Nyasenu; K Ali-Edje; A Ouro-Médeli; M Doufan; A Ehlan; M Prince-David Journal: Med Mal Infect Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 2.152
Authors: Romney M Humphries; Jennifer S Woo; Jun Ho Chung; Anita Sokovic; Claire C Bristow; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Vivian Black; Brian G Williams; Venessa Maseko; Frans Radebe; Helen V Rees; David A Lewis Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Tassaneewan Laksanasopin; Tiffany W Guo; Samiksha Nayak; Archana A Sridhara; Shi Xie; Owolabi O Olowookere; Paolo Cadinu; Fanxing Meng; Natalie H Chee; Jiyoon Kim; Curtis D Chin; Elisaphane Munyazesa; Placidie Mugwaneza; Alex J Rai; Veronicah Mugisha; Arnold R Castro; David Steinmiller; Vincent Linder; Jessica E Justman; Sabin Nsanzimana; Samuel K Sia Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Claire C Bristow; Segundo R Leon; Emily Huang; Brandon J Brown; Lourdes B Ramos; Silver K Vargas; Juan A Flores; Carlos F Caceres; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Claire C Bristow; Yaw Adu-Sarkodie; Raphael O Ondondo; Elizabeth Anne Bukusi; Claver Anoumou Dagnra; Khin Yi Oo; Eh Htoo Pe; Chanthavysouk Khamsay; Le Thi Houng; Roberto Vázquez Campuzano; Jason Estes; Jeffrey D Klausner Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Gifty Marley; Gengfeng Fu; Ye Zhang; Jianjun Li; Joseph D Tucker; Weiming Tang; Rongbin Yu Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 5.428