Literature DB >> 28604018

Resisting temptation for the good of the group: Binding moral values and the moralization of self-control.

Marlon Mooijman1, Peter Meindl2, Daphna Oyserman1, John Monterosso1, Morteza Dehghani1, John M Doris3, Jesse Graham1.   

Abstract

When do people see self-control as a moral issue? We hypothesize that the group-focused "binding" moral values of Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Purity/degradation play a particularly important role in this moralization process. Nine studies provide support for this prediction. First, moralization of self-control goals (e.g., losing weight, saving money) is more strongly associated with endorsing binding moral values than with endorsing individualizing moral values (Care/harm, Fairness/cheating). Second, binding moral values mediate the effect of other group-focused predictors of self-control moralization, including conservatism, religiosity, and collectivism. Third, guiding participants to consider morality as centrally about binding moral values increases moralization of self-control more than guiding participants to consider morality as centrally about individualizing moral values. Fourth, we replicate our core finding that moralization of self-control is associated with binding moral values across studies differing in measures and design-whether we measure the relationship between moral and self-control language across time, the perceived moral relevance of self-control behaviors, or the moral condemnation of self-control failures. Taken together, our findings suggest that self-control moralization is primarily group-oriented and is sensitive to group-oriented cues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28604018     DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Behavior Change.

Authors:  Angela L Duckworth; James J Gross
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 2.  The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers; Jojanneke van der Toorn; Yavor Paunov; Thed van Leeuwen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

3.  Functional assessment of restrictive eating: A three-study clinically heterogeneous and transdiagnostic investigation.

Authors:  Shirley B Wang; Kathryn R Fox; Chelsea Boccagno; Jill M Hooley; Patrick Mair; Matthew K Nock; Ann F Haynos
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2021-10

4.  A Person-Centered Approach to Moralization-The Case of Vaping.

Authors:  Laura Arhiri; Mihaela A Gherman; Andrei C Holman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Development and validation of the Japanese Moral Foundations Dictionary.

Authors:  Akiko Matsuo; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Yasuhiro Taguchi; Minoru Karasawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Guideline for improving the reliability of Google Ngram studies: Evidence from religious terms.

Authors:  Nadja Younes; Ulf-Dietrich Reips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Moral expressions, sources, and frames: Examining COVID-19 vaccination posts by facebook public pages.

Authors:  Weiyu Zhang; Rong Wang; Haodong Liu
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2022-09-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.