Literature DB >> 28603873

Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water.

Masayuki Ushio1,2,3, Hisato Fukuda4, Toshiki Inoue4, Kobayashi Makoto5, Osamu Kishida5,6, Keiichi Sato7, Koichi Murata8,9, Masato Nikaido10, Tetsuya Sado11, Yukuto Sato12, Masamichi Takeshita13, Wataru Iwasaki13, Hiroki Yamanaka4,14, Michio Kondoh4, Masaki Miya11.   

Abstract

Terrestrial animals must have frequent contact with water to survive, implying that environmental DNA (eDNA) originating from those animals should be detectable from places containing water in terrestrial ecosystems. Aiming to detect the presence of terrestrial mammals using forest water samples, we applied a set of universal PCR primers (MiMammal, a modified version of fish universal primers) for metabarcoding mammalian eDNA. The versatility of MiMammal primers was tested in silico and by amplifying DNAs extracted from tissues. The results suggested that MiMammal primers are capable of amplifying and distinguishing a diverse group of mammalian species. In addition, analyses of water samples from zoo cages of mammals with known species composition suggested that MiMammal primers could successfully detect mammalian species from water samples in the field. Then, we performed an experiment to detect mammals from natural ecosystems by collecting five 500-ml water samples from ponds in two cool-temperate forests in Hokkaido, northern Japan. MiMammal amplicon libraries were constructed using eDNA extracted from water samples, and sequences generated by Illumina MiSeq were subjected to data processing and taxonomic assignment. We thereby detected multiple species of mammals common to the sampling areas, including deer (Cervus nippon), mouse (Mus musculus), vole (Myodes rufocanus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), rat (Rattus norvegicus) and shrew (Sorex unguiculatus). Many previous applications of the eDNA metabarcoding approach have been limited to aquatic/semiaquatic systems, but the results presented here show that the approach is also promising even for forest mammal biodiversity surveys.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forest; Illumina MiSeq; Mammal; environmental DNA; metabarcoding; terrestrial ecosystem

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28603873     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity.

Authors:  Kevin Leempoel; Trevor Hebert; Elizabeth A Hadly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Parasites and blood-meal hosts of the tsetse fly in Tanzania: a metagenomics study.

Authors:  Ju Yeong Kim; Jun Ho Choi; Sung-Hyun Nam; Robert Fyumagwa; Tai-Soon Yong
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Detection and persistence of environmental DNA from an invasive, terrestrial mammal.

Authors:  Kelly E Williams; Kathryn P Huyvaert; Kurt C Vercauteren; Amy J Davis; Antoinette J Piaggio
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  MitoFish and MiFish Pipeline: A Mitochondrial Genome Database of Fish with an Analysis Pipeline for Environmental DNA Metabarcoding.

Authors:  Yukuto Sato; Masaki Miya; Tsukasa Fukunaga; Tetsuya Sado; Wataru Iwasaki
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Usefulness and limitations of sample pooling for environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish communities.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Sato; Yuki Sogo; Hideyuki Doi; Hiroki Yamanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Accounting for observation processes across multiple levels of uncertainty improves inference of species distributions and guides adaptive sampling of environmental DNA.

Authors:  Amy J Davis; Kelly E Williams; Nathan P Snow; Kim M Pepin; Antoinette J Piaggio
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding to detect pathogenic Leptospira and associated organisms in leptospirosis-endemic areas of Japan.

Authors:  Yukuto Sato; Masaru Mizuyama; Megumi Sato; Toshifumi Minamoto; Ryosuke Kimura; Claudia Toma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?

Authors:  Kei Nukazawa; Kentaro Akahoshi; Yoshihiro Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  eDNA sampled from stream networks correlates with camera trap detection rates of terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Arnaud Lyet; Loïc Pellissier; Alice Valentini; Tony Dejean; Abigail Hehmeyer; Robin Naidoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Demonstration of the potential of environmental DNA as a tool for the detection of avian species.

Authors:  Masayuki Ushio; Koichi Murata; Tetsuya Sado; Isao Nishiumi; Masamichi Takeshita; Wataru Iwasaki; Masaki Miya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.