[Purpose] To assess the effects of forearm support and shoulder posture on upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-three female university students were evaluated. Muscle activity was assessed by a portable surface electromyography (sEMG) system (Myomonitor IV, Delsys, USA). Upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity were recorded in five shoulder flexion postures: 0°, 15°, 30°, 45° and 60° and in two conditions: with the forearm supported and unsupported. Descriptive data analysis was performed and statistical analysis was conducted by a multivariate analysis of variance with three repeated factors (posture, support and side). [Results] Three-way interactions were not significant. Two-way interaction was significant for support and posture for both muscles, indicating that the muscular activity depends on the forearm support and shoulder posture. The forearm support reduced upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity for all shoulder flexion angles. The mean and standard deviation for this decrease was 7.8 (SD=4.6)% of the maximal voluntary contraction for anterior deltoid and 3.8 (SD=2.0)% of the maximal voluntary contraction for upper trapezius. In the unsupported condition, increasing the shoulder flexion angle caused an increase in the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activation. [Conclusion] These results highlight the importance of using forearm support and to maintain neutral shoulder posture, when the upper arms are not supported, to reduce muscle activation. Thus, this study provides evidence about the effect of these recommendations to reduce muscular activity.
[Purpose] To assess the effects of forearm support and shoulder posture on upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-three female university students were evaluated. Muscle activity was assessed by a portable surface electromyography (sEMG) system (Myomonitor IV, Delsys, USA). Upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity were recorded in five shoulder flexion postures: 0°, 15°, 30°, 45° and 60° and in two conditions: with the forearm supported and unsupported. Descriptive data analysis was performed and statistical analysis was conducted by a multivariate analysis of variance with three repeated factors (posture, support and side). [Results] Three-way interactions were not significant. Two-way interaction was significant for support and posture for both muscles, indicating that the muscular activity depends on the forearm support and shoulder posture. The forearm support reduced upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity for all shoulder flexion angles. The mean and standard deviation for this decrease was 7.8 (SD=4.6)% of the maximal voluntary contraction for anterior deltoid and 3.8 (SD=2.0)% of the maximal voluntary contraction for upper trapezius. In the unsupported condition, increasing the shoulder flexion angle caused an increase in the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activation. [Conclusion] These results highlight the importance of using forearm support and to maintain neutral shoulder posture, when the upper arms are not supported, to reduce muscle activation. Thus, this study provides evidence about the effect of these recommendations to reduce muscular activity.
The use of computers and portable devices, such as laptops, tablets, smartphones, has
increased dramatically among workers and the general population1,2,3,4), as well as musculoskeletal
symptoms among their users5,6,7,8). Portable device users tend to adopt non-neutral shoulder postures
and forearm unsupported for long periods of time, which may increase muscular activity3, 9,10,11,12).Low intensity and continuous upper trapezius and deltoid activation are regarded as a main
cause of neck/shoulder symptoms (pain or discomfort)13, 14). The mechanisms include
a stereotype recruitment of low threshold motor units (type 1 muscle fibers) associated with
a lack of temporal and spatial variation14).In order to prevent musculoskeletal symptoms ergonomic recommendations are proposed, among
them to support the forearm and to maintain the shoulders in a neutral posture15,16,17,18,19,20).
Several studies evaluated muscle activity in forearm and wrist support during typing and
mouse tasks. However, among the identified studies there is still divergence about the
effect of the forearm support15, 16, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27) and about the recommendation for safe
limits for the shoulder posture28,29,30).A recent meta-analysis about the effect of forearm support in reducing upper body disorders
showed that forearm support had statistically significant effect on preventing upper limb
disorders27). However, this conclusion
was based on only four studies, and none of them controlled for the shoulder posture in a
supported condition. Thus, the evidence of combined ergonomic interventions is not
established, indicating the practical application of this study.It is noteworthy that these recommendations are mostly applied to computer and industrial
tasks and the introduction of new technologies make the duration of the exposure higher and
in postural conditions less controlled. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the
effects of forearm support and shoulder posture on upper trapezius and anterior deltoid
activity. The study hypothesis is that the forearm support will reduce muscle activity in
relation to the unsupported condition, and the reduction of shoulder flexion angle will also
reduce the muscle activity.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
This study was designed as an observational cross-sectional study. Twenty-three university
students, female, right-handed and asymptomatic for musculoskeletal symptoms were recruited
among the university community by means of personal contact with the research group members,
pamphlets and posters fixed at high circulation places. The inclusion criteria for the study
were: to be apparently healthy, i.e., with no history of musculoskeletal injury, chronic or
acute disease (flu, cold, fever, diabetes, hypertension, etc.) and to use computer and
portable devices more than four hours per day, five days a week31). Participants who had a history of traumas (falls or
accidents) or musculoskeletal symptoms in the upper limbs were excluded from the study.The sample size was defined a priori and calculated in G*Power Program. The calculation
considered the application of a multivariate analysis of variance with three repeated
factors (posture, support and side), the power was set at 80% and the level of significance
at 5%. The primary outcome of this study is the upper trapezius muscle activation and the
effect size for this was calculated from pilot tests and was 0.4. The effect size was
calculated from partial eta squared. Personal and anthropometric characteristics of the
sample are presented in Table 1. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Human Research (CAAE
05658612.5.0000.5504) and a written informed consent was obtained from each subject.
Table 1.
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the sample
Females students (n=23)
Age (years)
23.7 ± 3.1
Educational level (%)
Incomplete University
11 (47.9)
Incomplete Post Graduation
12 (52.1)
Conjugal status (%)
Single
22 (95.7)
Married
1 (4.3)
Height (cm)
1.64 ± 0.04
Weight (kg)
60.2 ± 7.3
Body mass index (kg/cm²)
22.2 ± 2.6
Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SD and categorical data are presented as
absolute and relative frequencies [n (%)].
Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SD and categorical data are presented as
absolute and relative frequencies [n (%)].For recording upper arm movements, two inclinometers, which are small transducers
consisting of triaxial accelerometers and an acquisition unit (Logger Tecknologi HB, Åkarp,
Sweden) with a frequency of 20 Hz were used. The inclinometers present average angular error
of the transducer associated with the 1.3° software in three-dimensional conditions, the
reproducibility is high (0.2°). The noise is small (0.04°), independent of device
orientation and highly accurate32).Muscle activity was assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) using a portable system
(Myomonitor IV, Delsys, USA) composed of single differential electrodes (DE-2.3, Delsys,
Boston, USA) geometry with two parallel bars (1 mm × 1 cm, 99.9% Ag) separated by 1 cm. The
main characteristics of the electrodes are: CMRR of 92 dB, input impedance >1,015 in
parallel with 0.2 pF, the voltage gain of 10 times, noise of 1.2 uV (RMS). The acquisition
frequency used was 1,000 Hz and packaged by the main amplifier (Myomonitor IV, Delsys, USA)
with a gain set to 1,000 times, band-pass frequency 20–450 Hz, 16-bit resolution and 1.2 uV
of noise.An instrumented table with four load cell coupled, designed for this particular study
(Kratos Model CD, maximum capacity of 50 kgf, the output signal of 2 mV/V) with 20 Hz
frequency acquisition was used to measure the weight bearing of the upper limbs on the
table33). The table has 65 cm height,
59.5 cm wide and 86 cm length. The level of sensitivity of the load cells is 3 mV,
excitement between 1,500 to 1,600 mV. Load cells were tested for validity and test-retest
reliability and the results showed that errors were less than 5% of the measured value,
which is within the limits established by the manufacturer33). In order to standardize the shoulder flexion angles and forearm
support timber chocks used were designed to adjust the table height. These chocks have
heights between 1.8 and 10 cm that were placed under the table according to the
anthropometric measurements of each participant.Anthropometric digital scale with stadiometer (Wiso W721, maximum capacity of 180 kg and
grading 100 g) was also used.The preparation of the participants and the data collection was performed in the Laboratory
of Ergonomics and Preventive Physical Therapy at the Federal University of São Carlos,
Brazil. Personal and anthropometric data were collected. The furniture was adjusted
according to the anthropometric measurements of each participant34). After these measures the equipments were attached to the
subjects.The sEMG was recorded in the upper trapezius muscle and the anterior deltoid muscle
bilaterally. For better skin-electrode contact, the skin was cleaned. The placement of the
electrodes had reference to the seventh cervical vertebra and the acromion. For recording
the upper trapezius muscle, electrodes were placed two inches away from the middle line
between the seventh cervical vertebra and the acromion35, 36). For the anterior
deltoid muscle, electrodes were placed at one finger width distal and anterior to the
acromion36). The reference electrode was
placed in the manubrium of the sternum. Muscle activity was normalized by the EMG activity
obtained during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). To obtain this reference
value, three maximal isometric contractions were performed for each muscle, lasting 5
seconds each and 1 minute rest between them35). The MVIC of the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscles were
obtained with participants seated with the head in an upright position without flexion,
extension, lateral inclination or rotation, keeping the shoulders at 90° of abduction, with
the elbow extended and palms pointing down35). The volunteers were instructed to perform arm abduction against
resistance, which was applied by means of inelastic bands positioned in the final third of
the arm and fixed to the ground.To collect the data for flexion angles of the right and left arms, two inclinometers were
attached below the insertion of the anterior deltoid muscle37). First, the inclinometers were calibrated with respect to gravity
in the X, Y and Z. Thus, each of the six faces of the inclinometer was placed on a flat
surface for 5 seconds each. After calibration, the inclinometers were attached to the
participants. For fixing the inclinometers palpation was performed to identify the distal
insertion of the deltoid muscle. After fixation of the transducers, the neutral reference
position for upper limb was recorded with the subject seated, with the axillary region
resting on the chair back and the free arm vertically. The support of a halter 2 kg ensured
that the arm be maintained perpendicular to the ground. The position of reference indicative
of the direction of movement of the upper limb was recorded during 90° arm abduction in the
scapular plane38). Immediately after the
fixation of equipment participants were able to perform the task with and without forearm
support on the table.Initially, participants were instructed to sit in the chair and table height was adjusted
to the elbow level height34). To adjust
the table height, ensuring the forearm support on the table and the lumbar spine in the back
of the chair were used timber chocks, which have increased in the shoulder flexion angles
without modification of spine position. Before starting the data collection, a physical
therapist trained the participants to perform both task conditions: sitting still with and
without forearm support on the table with load cells. The subjects were positioned with the
shoulder at different flexion angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°) with the aid of the
inclinometer. This training consisted of one repetition in each position with and without
the forearm support. It was provided 5 minutes rest before starting the collection of actual
data. After training, the participants performed the task with and without forearm support
in different shoulder flexion angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°) and the data were recorded. To
collect data, the tasks and shoulder flexion angles order were randomized. During the
conditions, upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity were measured, as well as shoulder
posture and weight bearing on the table by the load cells. Each position was recorded during
30 seconds and there was two minutes rest time between the conditions.Data from sEMG, inclinometer and load cells were processed for routine developed in Matlab
(version 7.6, the Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Posture data were filtered with a
Butterworth filter 2nd order low pass 5 Hz. sEMG data were filtered with a 4th order
Butterworth filter, band-pass 20–450 Hz and the root mean square (RMS) was calculated from
raw data with 100 ms windows. After calculating the RMS obtained during the central 10
seconds of the tasks, the data were normalized by the RMS peak obtained in the three central
seconds CIVMs of the three trials35). The
average values of shoulder flexion and weight bearing were obtained in each of the test
conditions (with and without support) at different amplitudes of shoulder flexion (0°, 15°,
30°, 45° e 60°).Data were descriptively analyzed by calculating the mean and standard deviation.
Statistical analysis was performed by multivariate analysis with three factors (three way
MANOVA with repeated measures). The dependent variables were the upper trapezius and
anterior deltoid activity. The independent variables were the sides (right and left),
forearm support condition (supported and unsupported) and the shoulder angle (0°, 15°, 30°,
45° e 60°). All independent variables were considered within factors. As the assumption of
sphericity was not held (p<0.05 in the Mauchly test), the results obtained by the
Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment, which reduces the degrees of freedom for the test compensate
for the lack of sphericity of the data, were retrieved. When the interaction was significant
simple effects were obtained. Multiple comparisons (Bonferroni post hoc tests) were applied
to identify conditions that differed from each other. Effect sizes (partial eta squared) and
observed power were also reported. Analyses were performed using SPSS (version 11.5) and the
level of significance was set at 5%.
RESULTS
The forearm support reduced upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscular activity
bilaterally, for all upper arm angles. The mean and standard deviation for this reduction
was 7.8% (SD=4.6) MVIC for anterior deltoid and 3.8% (SD=2.0) MVIC for upper trapezius. In
the unsupported condition, increasing arm elevation caused an increase in muscle activity,
this increase was 11.9% MVIC for anterior deltoid and 3.2% MVIC for upper trapezius. In the
supported condition, increasing the arm flexion caused a significant increase in weight
bearing on the table, except between 30° and 45° (Table
2
).
Table 2.
Mean values ± SD for upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscle activity (% of
MVIC) in supported and unsupported conditions according to the upper arm angles and
mean values ± SD for weight bearing (% of the upper arm weight) measured by strain
gauges at the desk according to the upper arm angles
The statistical results showed no significant three-way interaction (side*support*angle)
for the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscles. Similarly, no significant interactions
between side*support and side*angle for both muscles were found (Table 3).
Table 3.
Summary MANOVA three-way repeated measures
Dependent variable
Fixed factors
p
Effect size
Power
Upper trapezius
laterality*support*angle
0.71
0.02
0.14
support*laterality
0.67
0.01
0.07
angle*laterality
0.78
0.02
0.11
support*angle
0.001
0.60
1.00
Anterior deltoid
laterality*support*angle
0.12
0.10
0.40
support*laterality
0.07
0.14
0.45
angle*laterality
0.23
0.06
0.25
support*angle
0.001
0.75
1.00
The two way interaction between support*angle was significant for both muscles. The simple
effects analysis indicated a difference between the conditions for all angles, both for the
upper trapezius and anterior deltoid (p<0.01), with higher muscle activity in the
condition without support (p<0.01). In the supported condition, the upper trapezius
muscle showed a higher activation at 15° than all other angles (p<0.01) and the neutral
position (0°) have higher levels of activation in relation to angles of 45° and 60°
(p<0.01). On the other hand, for the unsupported condition the upper trapezius and
anterior deltoid activation progressively increases with increasing arm flexion angle.
DISCUSSION
The results showed differences between the support conditions and arm flexion angles for
upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscles, and muscle activity was higher in the absence
of support for all angles of arm flexion. However, in the supported condition the increased
arm flexion angle did not cause progressive increase in the activation of both muscles.The studies found in the literature did not investigate the effect of forearm support on
muscle activation in a static condition. Besides this, few studies have examined muscle
activity at different angles of arm flexion and abduction. Some studies identified increased
muscle activity in upper trapezius and anterior deltoid due to the increased arm angles in
unsupported condition39, 40). Unlike previous studies that evaluated only the flexion
angles of the arm without support, this study had as main novelty to evaluate the combined
effect of forearm posture and support for musculoskeletal overload. These findings are
consistent with the results of this study, which indicate that there is a progressive
increase in muscle activity due to the increase of the arm flexion in the unsupported
condition.Besides that, the literature recognizes that there is an association between sEMG activity
of both muscles and the development of musculoskeletal complaints. Low intensity and
continuous upper trapezius and deltoid activation are regarded as a main cause of
neck/shoulder symptoms (pain or discomfort)13, 14). The mechanisms include a stereotype
recruitment of low threshold motor units (type 1 muscle fibers) associated with a lack of
temporal and spatial variation.In supported condition, there was a reduction in muscle activation with increased arm
flexion angles. The highest level of activation in 15° of flexion in relation to the neutral
position can be attributed to the need to maintain this posture, which was not compensated
by increased weight bearing.Furthermore, the results indicate that the anterior deltoid muscle showed greater
activation at all angles of arm flexion in the condition without support compared to the
upper trapezius muscle. This may be related to the different muscle functions as the
anterior deltoid muscle’s main function is to stabilize the shoulder complex, the anterior
portion being the primary active for the movement of arm flexion41) and the function of the upper trapezius is to stabilize
the cervical spine and the scapula41, 42).Considering the weight bearing on the table, the results indicate that the higher arm
angles increased weight bearing and decreased muscle activation of the upper trapezius and
anterior deltoid muscles. Some studies assessed muscle activity while using the forearm
support and wrist in computer users and also showed a decrease in muscle activation with the
use of forearm support16,17,18,19,20,21,22, 25, 26).These results emphasized the interaction between the forearm support and the arm angles to
determine upper trapezius and anterior deltoid activity, which reveals that it is important
to consider the forearm support, besides the shoulder posture, to estimate the neck/shoulder
activation.Some limitations can be identified in this study. The sample size was not sufficient to
detect three-way interactions, as showed by power results. Muscle fatigue in the unsupported
condition was not evaluated, however, because the short duration (30s) of each test and
randomization of the angles and the test conditions (with or without support), it is
believed that this source of error was minimized. Only female and right-handed subjects were
recruited. Therefore, the results of this study may not be generalized to male
population.The results of this study indicated that the forearm support decreased the upper trapezius
and anterior deltoid activation in different angles of shoulder flexion when compared to the
condition without support. These results highlight the importance of combined ergonomic
interventions to minimize the neck/shoulder muscle activation. In addition, the results
allow us to suggest the design of future studies, with longitudinal design, with the
evaluation of the use of forearm support during the work to verify its effect on the risk of
musculoskeletal disorders. Thus, a practical and ergonomic suggestion to reduce muscle work
for people with no arm space rests is to keep the arms closer to the body (i.e. reduce the
shoulder flexion angle), which can reduce stress in the shoulder region.
Authors: Therese N Hanvold; Morten Wærsted; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Espen Bjertness; Hein Stigum; Jos Twisk; Kaj Bo Veiersted Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Stefany Lee; Fernanda Cabegi DE Barros; Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi DE Castro; Tatiana DE Oliveira Sato Journal: Ind Health Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 2.179