Literature DB >> 28602275

Alcohol fixation of bacteria to surgical instruments increases cleaning difficulty and may contribute to sterilization inefficacy.

Dayane de Melo Costa1, Lillian Kelly de Oliveira Lopes2, Honghua Hu2, Anaclara Ferreira Veiga Tipple3, Karen Vickery4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol is frequently inappropriately used on surgical instruments to reduce bacterial contamination, but fixes protein to stainless steel. Here we compare the effect of air drying, prolonged soaking in water, and alcohol treatment on cleaning difficulty of contaminated forceps.
METHODS: Haltsted-mosquito forceps were contaminated with only Staphylococcus aureus. Instruments were air-dried for 10 (control), 75, or 240 minutes, soaked in water, or air dried then treated with ethanol or isopropanol for 10 seconds. All instruments were prewashed for 15 minutes. Forceps contaminated with blood and S aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were dried and then sprayed or wiped with ethanol, and prewashed. Bacterial viability and soiling were determined by standard plate culture and crystal violet staining, respectively.
RESULTS: Soaking or spraying instruments with alcohol significantly reduced viable bacterial numbers, but significantly increased soil attached to forceps, as did air drying. Wiping instruments with alcohol had little effect on bacterial viability, but increased cleaning difficulty. Soaking in water for 75 or 240 minutes increased cleaning difficulty perhaps due to bacterial attachment to forceps.
CONCLUSIONS: Treating contaminated instruments with alcohol, allowing them to dry, or allowing them to soak in water for prolonged periods increases cleaning difficulty and should be discouraged.
Copyright © 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decontamination; Delayed processing; Drying soil; Fixatives; Instrument pre-cleaning; Prolonged wetting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28602275     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the Glass Bead Sterilizer for Sterilizing Surgical Instruments.

Authors:  Beth Skiles; Nancy A Johnston; G Kenitra Hendrix; Debra L Hickman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 1.706

2.  Perception of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Personnel on Society Recommendations on Personal Protective Equipment, Case Selection, and Scope Cleaning During Covid-19 Pandemic: An International Survey Study.

Authors:  Parit Mekaroonkamol; Kasenee Tiankanon; Rapat Pittayanon; Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Fariha Shams; Ghias Un Nabi Tayyab; Julia Massaad; Saurabh Chawla; Stanley Khoo; Siriboon Attasaranya; Nonthalee Pausawasdi; Qiang Cai; Thawee Ratanachu-Ek; Pradermchai Kongkham; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-09-29

3.  Influence of Fine Management Combined With PDCA Cycle Method on Disinfection Qualified Rate and Performance Grade of Ophthalmic Precision Instruments.

Authors:  Fanli Zeng; Xiuling Wang; Yan Gao; Ling Hu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 4.  Management of Instrument Sterilization Workflow in Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Dioguardi; Diego Sovereto; Gaetano Illuzzi; Enrica Laneve; Bruna Raddato; Claudia Arena; Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio; Giorgia Apollonia Caloro; Khrystyna Zhurakivska; Giuseppe Troiano; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-02-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.