Literature DB >> 28602241

Incorporating biological control into IPM decision making.

Kristopher L Giles1, Brian P McCornack2, Tom A Royer3, Norman C Elliott4.   

Abstract

Of the many ways biological control can be incorporated into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs, natural enemy thresholds are arguably most easily adopted by stakeholders. Integration of natural enemy thresholds into IPM programs requires ecological and cost/benefit crop production data, threshold model validation, and an understanding of the socioeconomic factors that influence stakeholder decisions about biological control. These thresholds are more likely to be utilized by stakeholders when integrated into dynamic web-based IPM decision support systems that summarize pest management data and push site-specific biological control management recommendations to decision-makers. We highlight recent literature on topics related to natural enemy thresholds and how findings may allow pest suppression services to be incorporated into advanced IPM programs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28602241     DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci            Impact factor:   5.186


  2 in total

1.  Field investigation- and dietary metabarcoding-based screening of arthropods that prey on primary tea pests.

Authors:  Tingbang Yang; Xuhao Song; Yang Zhong; Bin Wang; Caiquan Zhou
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Integrated pest management in the academic small greenhouse setting: A case study using Solanum spp. (Solanaceae).

Authors:  Daniel S Hayes; Ingrid E Jordon-Thaden; Jason T Cantley; Angela J McDonnell; Christopher T Martine
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.936

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.