Literature DB >> 28601490

Is the Simple Shoulder Test a valid outcome instrument for shoulder arthroplasty?

Jason E Hsu1, Stacy M Russ1, Jeremy S Somerson2, Anna Tang1, Winston J Warme1, Frederick A Matsen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) is a brief, inexpensive, and widely used patient-reported outcome tool, but it has not been rigorously evaluated for patients having shoulder arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to rigorously evaluate the validity of the SST for outcome assessment in shoulder arthroplasty using a systematic review of the literature and an analysis of its properties in a series of 408 surgical cases.
METHODS: SST scores, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scores, and satisfaction scores were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing preoperative and 2-year postoperative scores. Criterion validity was determined by correlating the SST with the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Construct validity was tested through 5 clinical hypotheses regarding satisfaction, comorbidities, insurance status, previous failed surgery, and narcotic use.
RESULTS: Scores after arthroplasty improved from 3.9 ± 2.8 to 10.2 ± 2.3 (P < .001). The change in SST correlated strongly with patient satisfaction (P < .001). The SST had large Cohen's d effect sizes and standardized response means. Criterion validity was supported by significant differences between satisfied and unsatisfied patients, those with more severe and less severe comorbidities, those with workers' compensation or Medicaid and other types of insurance, those with and without previous failed shoulder surgery, and those taking and those not taking narcotic pain medication before surgery (P < .005).
CONCLUSION: These data combined with a systematic review of the literature demonstrate that the SST is a valid and responsive patient-reported outcome measure for assessing the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Simple Shoulder Test; outcomes; psychometric properties; shoulder arthritis; shoulder arthroplasty; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28601490     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  14 in total

1.  Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Derek D Berglund; Dragomir Mijic; Tsun Yee Law; Jennifer Kurowicki; Samuel Rosas; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  The contribution of the scapula to active shoulder motion and self-assessed function in three hundred and fifty two patients prior to elective shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; David Andrew Hulet; Chris McDonald; Anastasia Whitson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Does Postoperative Glenoid Retroversion Affect the 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Benjamin C Service; Jason E Hsu; Jeremy S Somerson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Ream and run and total shoulder: patient and shoulder characteristics in five hundred forty-four concurrent cases.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Anastasia Whitson; Sarah E Jackins; Moni B Neradilek; Winston J Warme; Jason E Hsu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The Efficacy of Pain Neuroscience Education on Active Rehabilitation Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A CONSORT-Compliant Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hyunjoong Kim; Seungwon Lee
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-10

6.  Arthroscopic management of glenohumeral arthritis in the young patient does not negatively impact the outcome of subsequent anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Corey J Schiffman; Anastasia J Whitson; Sagar S Chawla; Frederick A Matsen; Jason E Hsu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the simple shoulder test in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Tamer Shousha; Fatima Alowais; Ashokan Arumugam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Clinical Results after Arthroscopic Treatment of Septic Shoulder with Proximal Bone Involvement.

Authors:  Jae Woo Shim; Sung Woo Hong; Jeung Yeol Jeong; Sang Min Lee; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Effect of Microcurrent Stimulation on Pain, Shoulder Function, and Grip Strength in Early Post-Operative Phase after Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Donghyun Yi; Hwanyong Lim; Jongeun Yim
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 10.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.