Literature DB >> 28601242

Kinematic models of lower limb joints for musculo-skeletal modelling and optimization in gait analysis.

Alberto Leardini1, Claudio Belvedere2, Fabrizio Nardini3, Nicola Sancisi3, Michele Conconi3, Vincenzo Parenti-Castelli3.   

Abstract

Kinematic models of lower limb joints have several potential applications in musculoskeletal modelling of the locomotion apparatus, including the reproduction of the natural joint motion. These models have recently revealed their value also for in vivo motion analysis experiments, where the soft-tissue artefact is a critical known problem. This arises at the interface between the skin markers and the underlying bone, and can be reduced by defining multibody kinematic models of the lower limb and by running optimization processes aimed at obtaining estimates of position and orientation of relevant bones. With respect to standard methods based on the separate optimization of each single body segment, this technique makes it also possible to respect joint kinematic constraints. Whereas the hip joint is traditionally assumed as a 3 degrees of freedom ball and socket articulation, many previous studies have proposed a number of different kinematic models for the knee and ankle joints. Some of these are rigid, while others have compliant elements. Some models have clear anatomical correspondences and include real joint constraints; other models are more kinematically oriented, these being mainly aimed at reproducing joint kinematics. This paper provides a critical review of the kinematic models reported in literature for the major lower limb joints and used for the reduction of soft-tissue artefact. Advantages and disadvantages of these models are discussed, considering their anatomical significance, accuracy of predictions, computational costs, feasibility of personalization, and other features. Their use in the optimization process is also addressed, both in normal and pathological subjects.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motion analysis; Multibody kinematic optimization models; Musculoskeletal modelling; Soft-tissue artefact

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28601242     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  5 in total

1.  In vivo static and dynamic lengthening measurements of the posterior cruciate ligament at high knee flexion angles.

Authors:  Caecilia Charbonnier; Victoria B Duthon; Sylvain Chagué; Frank C Kolo; Jacques Ménétrey
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Fit to Burst: Toward Noninvasive Estimation of Achilles Tendon Load Using Burst Vibrations.

Authors:  Nicholas B Bolus; Hyeon Ki Jeong; Bradley M Blaho; Mohsen Safaei; Aaron J Young; Omer T Inan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Reference Frame Unification of IMU-Based Joint Angle Estimation: The Experimental Investigation and a Novel Method.

Authors:  Chunzhi Yi; Feng Jiang; Chifu Yang; Zhiyuan Chen; Zhen Ding; Jie Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Statistical-Shape Prediction of Lower Limb Kinematics During Cycling, Squatting, Lunging, and Stepping-Are Bone Geometry Predictors Helpful?

Authors:  Joris De Roeck; Kate Duquesne; Jan Van Houcke; Emmanuel A Audenaert
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-12

5.  Effectiveness of Global Optimisation and Direct Kinematics in Predicting Surgical Outcome in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Claude Fiifi Hayford; Emma Pratt; John P Cashman; Owain G Evans; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.