Literature DB >> 28600715

Partition dependence in consumer choice: Perceptual groupings do not reliably shape decisions.

Sheri Reichelson1, Alexandra Zax1, Ilona Bass1,2, Andrea L Patalano1, Hilary C Barth3.   

Abstract

The partitioning of options into arbitrary categories has been shown to influence decisions about allocating choices or resources among those options; this phenomenon is called partition dependence. While we do not call into question the validity of the partition dependence phenomenon in the present work, we do examine the robustness of one of the experimental paradigms reported by Fox, Ratner, and Lieb (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 538-551, 2005, Study 4). In three experiments (N = 300) conducted here, participants chose from a menu of perceptually partitioned options (varieties of candy distributed across bowls). We found no clear evidence of partition dependent choice in children (Experiment 1) and no evidence at all of partition dependence in adults' choices (Experiments 1-3). This was true even when methods were closely matched to those of Fox et al.'s Study 4 (Experiment 3). We conclude that the candy-bowl choice task does not reliably elicit partition dependence and propose possible explanations for the discrepancy between these findings and prior reports. Future work will explore the conditions under which partition dependence in consumer choice does reliably arise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Diversification bias; Partition dependence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28600715     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1326-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  7 in total

1.  Nudging physician prescription decisions by partitioning the order set: results of a vignette-based study.

Authors:  David Tannenbaum; Jason N Doctor; Stephen D Persell; Mark W Friedberg; Daniella Meeker; Elisha M Friesema; Noah J Goldstein; Jeffrey A Linder; Craig R Fox
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty.

Authors:  Craig R Fox; Yuval Rottenstreich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-05

3.  Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty.

Authors:  Kelly E See; Craig R Fox; Yuval S Rottenstreich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  How psychological framing affects economic market prices in the lab and field.

Authors:  Ulrich Sonnemann; Colin F Camerer; Craig R Fox; Thomas Langer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence.

Authors:  Craig R Fox; Rebecca K Ratner; Daniel S Lieb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

6.  Which Is Better: Simultaneous or Sequential Choice?

Authors:  D Read; G Antonides; L van den Ouden; H Trienekens
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2001-01

7.  Partition dependence in development: Are children's decisions shaped by the arbitrary grouping of options?

Authors:  Sheri Reichelson; Alexandra Zax; Andrea L Patalano; Hilary C Barth
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 2.143

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Partition dependence in financial aid distribution to income categories.

Authors:  Chenmu Xing; Katherine Williams; Jamie Hom; Meghana Kandlur; Praise Owoyemi; Joanna Paul; Ray Alexander; Elizabeth Shackney; Hilary Barth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.