Literature DB >> 28600455

Quantifying the Shift Toward Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Paolo De Sciscio1, Jacob Brubert2, Michele De Sciscio2, Marta Serrani2, Joanna Stasiak2, Geoff D Moggridge2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has expanded to include patients at intermediate- and low-risk cohorts. We sought to determine disease prevalence and treatment distribution including transcatheter aortic valve replacement eligibility in low-risk patients across 37 advanced economies. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Four systematic searches were conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database for studies evaluating disease prevalence, severity, decision making, and survival in patients with aortic stenosis. Estimates of disease prevalence and treatment eligibility were calculated using stochastic simulation and population data for the 37 countries comprising the International Monetary Fund's advanced economies index. Fifty-six studies comprising 42 965 patients were included across 5 domains: prevalence, severity, symptom status, treatment modality, and outcome. The pooled prevalence in the general population aged 60 to 74 years and >75 years was 2.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-4.1%) and 13.1% (95% CI, 8.2%-17.9%), respectively-corresponding to an estimated 16.1 million (95% CI, 12.2-20.3) people in 37 advanced economies. Of these, an estimated 3.2 million (95% CI, 2.2-4.4) patients have severe aortic stenosis with 1.9 million (95% CI, 1.3-2.6) eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement. There are ≈485 230 (95% CI, 284 550-66 7350) high-risk/inoperable patients, 152 690 (95% CI, 73 410-263 000) intermediate-risk patients, and 378 890 (95% CI, 205 130-610 210) low-risk patients eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
CONCLUSIONS: With a prevalence of 4.5%, an estimated 16.1 million people aged ≥60 years across 37 advanced economies have aortic stenosis. Of these, there are ≈1.9 million patients eligible for surgical aortic valve replacement and 1.0 million patients eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve; aortic valve stenosis; heart valve prosthesis; meta-analysis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28600455     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  11 in total

1.  The Evolving Management of Aortic Valve Disease: 5-Year Trends in SAVR, TAVR, and Medical Therapy.

Authors:  Andrew M Goldsweig; Hyo Jung Tak; Li-Wu Chen; Herbert D Aronow; Binita Shah; Dhaval S Kolte; Poonam Velagapudi; Nihar Desai; Molly Szerlip; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the developing world: Lessons learnt and its implications for practice.

Authors:  Rajat Datta; Prashant Bharadwaj; Naveen Aggarwal; G Keshavamurthy; Prafull Sharma; Nitin Bajaj; Vijay Bohra; V S Guleria; Balbir Singh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 3.  Evolving Indications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared to Surgical Valve Replacement: A Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Shitij Shrivastava; Shashwat Shrivastava; Kahkashan Mumtaz; Jihan A Mostafa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 4.  Cell Sources for Tissue Engineering Strategies to Treat Calcific Valve Disease.

Authors:  Eva Jover; Marco Fagnano; Gianni Angelini; Paolo Madeddu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-11-06

Review 5.  TAVR: A Review of Current Practices and Considerations in Low-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Jenna Spears; Yousif Al-Saiegh; David Goldberg; Sina Manthey; Sheldon Goldberg
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Outcomes of concomitant percutaneous coronary interventions and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Fadi Ghrair; Jad Omran; Joseph Thomas; Kristina Gifft; Haytham Allaham; Mohammad Eniezat; Arun Kumar; Tariq Enezate
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2020-12-27

7.  Editorial: Inflammation, Metabolism and Epigenetics in Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Eva Jover; Ashton Faulkner; Paolo Madeddu; Natalia López-Andrés
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 8.  The safety of exercise for older patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing conservative management: A narrative review.

Authors:  Satoshi Nashimoto; Tatsuro Inoue; Kazuki Hotta; Yuichi Sugito; Susumu Iida; Atsuhiro Tsubaki
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-04

9.  Treatment of Aortic Stenosis in Elderly Individuals in Brazil: How Long Can We Wait?

Authors:  Marcelo Antônio Cartaxo Queiroga Lopes; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Age-stratified outcomes of bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valve replacements in an Australian cohort of 13 377 patients.

Authors:  Oluwadamisola Temilade Sotade; Michael Falster; Leonard N Girardi; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Louisa R Jorm
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2020-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.