PURPOSE: To estimate the difference in income generated if all women presenting in our institute over a 5-year period were treated with MRI-based image-guided brachytherapy (MR-IGBT) instead of conventional radiograph-based brachytherapy (CR-BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Outcome data from 463 patients (94 treated with MR-IGBT) treated in our institute was used to simulate cumulative women-days of work and cumulative income over 5 years for 5526 patients expected to be treated in this period. The average daily income for a woman was derived from the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) survey data. Outcomes from both unmatched and propensity score-matched data sets were simulated. RESULTS: The cumulative income in 5 years ranged between Rs 101-168 million if all patients presenting at our institute underwent MR-IGBT. The simulated excess income ranged from Rs 4-45 million after 5 years, which represented 6-66% of the expenditure incurred for acquiring the required equipment and manpower for practicing exclusive MR-IGBT. CONCLUSIONS: Using outcome data from a prospective cohort of patients treated with MR-IGBT in our institute, we demonstrated that significant economic gains may be realized if MR-IGBT was used instead of CR-BT.
PURPOSE: To estimate the difference in income generated if all women presenting in our institute over a 5-year period were treated with MRI-based image-guided brachytherapy (MR-IGBT) instead of conventional radiograph-based brachytherapy (CR-BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Outcome data from 463 patients (94 treated with MR-IGBT) treated in our institute was used to simulate cumulative women-days of work and cumulative income over 5 years for 5526 patients expected to be treated in this period. The average daily income for a woman was derived from the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) survey data. Outcomes from both unmatched and propensity score-matched data sets were simulated. RESULTS: The cumulative income in 5 years ranged between Rs 101-168 million if all patients presenting at our institute underwent MR-IGBT. The simulated excess income ranged from Rs 4-45 million after 5 years, which represented 6-66% of the expenditure incurred for acquiring the required equipment and manpower for practicing exclusive MR-IGBT. CONCLUSIONS: Using outcome data from a prospective cohort of patients treated with MR-IGBT in our institute, we demonstrated that significant economic gains may be realized if MR-IGBT was used instead of CR-BT.
Authors: Richard Pötter; Kari Tanderup; Christian Kirisits; Astrid de Leeuw; Kathrin Kirchheiner; Remi Nout; Li Tee Tan; Christine Haie-Meder; Umesh Mahantshetty; Barbara Segedin; Peter Hoskin; Kjersti Bruheim; Bhavana Rai; Fleur Huang; Erik Van Limbergen; Max Schmid; Nicole Nesvacil; Alina Sturdza; Lars Fokdal; Nina Boje Kibsgaard Jensen; Dietmar Georg; Marianne Assenholt; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Christel Nomden; Israel Fortin; Supriya Chopra; Uulke van der Heide; Tamara Rumpold; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-01-11