Afton M Koball1, Dylan J Jester2, Sarah E Domoff3, Kara J Kallies2, Karen B Grothe4, Shanu N Kothari5. 1. Department of Behavioral Health, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin. Electronic address: amkoball@gundersenhealth.org. 2. Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan; Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Department of General Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Support following bariatric surgery is vital to ensure long-term postoperative success. Many individuals undergoing bariatric surgery are turning to online modalities, especially the popular social media platform Facebook, to access support groups and pages. Despite evidence suggesting that the majority of patients considering bariatric surgery are utilizing online groups, little is known about the actual content of these groups. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to conduct a content analysis of bariatric surgery support groups and pages on Facebook. SETTING: Online via Facebook, independent academic medical center, United States. METHODS: Data from bariatric surgery-related Facebook support groups and pages were extracted over a 1-month period in 2016. Salient content themes (e.g., progress posts, depression content, eating behaviors) were coded reliably (all κ> .70). RESULTS: More than 6,800 posts and replies were coded. Results indicated that seeking recommendations (11%), providing information or recommendations (53%), commenting on changes since surgery (19%), and lending support to other members (32%) were the most common types of posts. Content surrounding anxiety, eating behaviors, depression, body image, weight bias, and alcohol was found less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Online bariatric surgery groups can be used to receive support, celebrate physical and emotional accomplishments, provide anecdotal accounts of the "bariatric lifestyle" for preoperative patients, and comment on challenges with mental health and experiences of weight bias. Providers should become acquainted with the content commonly found in online groups and exercise caution in recommending these platforms to information-seeking patients.
BACKGROUND: Support following bariatric surgery is vital to ensure long-term postoperative success. Many individuals undergoing bariatric surgery are turning to online modalities, especially the popular social media platform Facebook, to access support groups and pages. Despite evidence suggesting that the majority of patients considering bariatric surgery are utilizing online groups, little is known about the actual content of these groups. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to conduct a content analysis of bariatric surgery support groups and pages on Facebook. SETTING: Online via Facebook, independent academic medical center, United States. METHODS: Data from bariatric surgery-related Facebook support groups and pages were extracted over a 1-month period in 2016. Salient content themes (e.g., progress posts, depression content, eating behaviors) were coded reliably (all κ> .70). RESULTS: More than 6,800 posts and replies were coded. Results indicated that seeking recommendations (11%), providing information or recommendations (53%), commenting on changes since surgery (19%), and lending support to other members (32%) were the most common types of posts. Content surrounding anxiety, eating behaviors, depression, body image, weight bias, and alcohol was found less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Online bariatric surgery groups can be used to receive support, celebrate physical and emotional accomplishments, provide anecdotal accounts of the "bariatric lifestyle" for preoperative patients, and comment on challenges with mental health and experiences of weight bias. Providers should become acquainted with the content commonly found in online groups and exercise caution in recommending these platforms to information-seeking patients.
Authors: Carlos Zerrweck; Sebastián Arana; Carmen Calleja; Nelson Rodríguez; Eduardo Moreno; Juan P Pantoja; Gianluca Donatini Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Tosca D Braun; Diane M Quinn; Andrea Stone; Amy A Gorin; Jennifer Ferrand; Rebecca M Puhl; Jessica Sierra; Darren Tishler; Pavlos Papasavas Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: María José Torrente-Sánchez; Manuel Ferrer-Márquez; Beatriz Estébanez-Ferrero; María Del Mar Jiménez-Lasserrotte; Alicia Ruiz-Muelle; María Isabel Ventura-Miranda; Iria Dobarrio-Sanz; José Granero-Molina Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda; Valeria L Mata; Emanuel Vanegas; Miguel Felix; Jonathan A Bernstein; Fanny M Jiménez; Juan Carlos Calderon; Peter Chedraui; Antonio Wd Gavilanes Journal: Int J Telemed Appl Date: 2020-01-23