Justin Schwartzenberger1, Angela Presson2, Adam Lyle1, Andrew O'Farrell1, Andrew R Tyser3. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: Andrew.tyser@hsc.utah.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Obtaining remote patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is limited by low patient response rates and resource-intensive collection methods. We hypothesized that an e-mail-delivered Web-based data collection tool would outperform the traditional methods of telephone and standard mail for collecting long-term Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores at a minimum of 1 year following carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial of 969 patients who underwent CTR at a tertiary medical center within the past 5 years. Participants were randomized to the PRO collection methods of mail, telephone, and e-mail. The primary outcome was survey response rate at 1 year after surgery. Secondary analyses included data completeness and the effect of time from surgery, mode effects, and patient modality preference. RESULTS: At 1 year from surgery, the response rates were 64% for telephone and 42% for both mail and e-mail. Ninety-nine percent of telephone surveys were complete compared with 88% and 83% for mail and e-mail, respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall response rate at 1 or 5 years after surgery, nor in the BCTQ score between the modalities. CONCLUSIONS: A higher response rate and increased survey completeness was achieved by telephone contact methods compared with standard mailings or Web-based methods for PRO collection after CTR 1 to 5 years after surgery. A Web-based method demonstrated response rates equivalent to those of standard mail, was the most preferred modality, and offered logistical advantages such as automation and immediate integration with outcome databases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Obtaining PRO routinely after treatment may increase in importance. A Web-based interface may assist clinicians in decreasing the resource utilization typically associated with more traditional methods used to obtain outcome data.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Obtaining remote patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is limited by low patient response rates and resource-intensive collection methods. We hypothesized that an e-mail-delivered Web-based data collection tool would outperform the traditional methods of telephone and standard mail for collecting long-term Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores at a minimum of 1 year following carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial of 969 patients who underwent CTR at a tertiary medical center within the past 5 years. Participants were randomized to the PRO collection methods of mail, telephone, and e-mail. The primary outcome was survey response rate at 1 year after surgery. Secondary analyses included data completeness and the effect of time from surgery, mode effects, and patient modality preference. RESULTS: At 1 year from surgery, the response rates were 64% for telephone and 42% for both mail and e-mail. Ninety-nine percent of telephone surveys were complete compared with 88% and 83% for mail and e-mail, respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall response rate at 1 or 5 years after surgery, nor in the BCTQ score between the modalities. CONCLUSIONS: A higher response rate and increased survey completeness was achieved by telephone contact methods compared with standard mailings or Web-based methods for PRO collection after CTR 1 to 5 years after surgery. A Web-based method demonstrated response rates equivalent to those of standard mail, was the most preferred modality, and offered logistical advantages such as automation and immediate integration with outcome databases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Obtaining PRO routinely after treatment may increase in importance. A Web-based interface may assist clinicians in decreasing the resource utilization typically associated with more traditional methods used to obtain outcome data.
Authors: Andrew R Stephens; Andrew R Tyser; Angela P Presson; Brian Orleans; Angela A Wang; Douglas T Hutchinson; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: J Hand Surg Glob Online Date: 2020-12-04
Authors: Anish K Agarwal; Zarina S Ali; Frances Shofer; Ruiying Xiong; Jessica Hemmons; Evan Spencer; Dina Abdel-Rahman; Brian Sennett; Mucio K Delgado Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-03-17
Authors: Robin Chatters; Cindy L Cooper; Alicia O'Cathain; Caroline Murphy; Athene Lane; Katie Sutherland; Christopher Burton; Angela Cape; Louis Tunnicliffe Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 4.612
Authors: David N Bernstein; Victor A van de Graaf; Irina Meijers; Anne Portengen; Amanda Klaassen; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Rudolf W Poolman; Diederik H R Kempen Journal: Musculoskeletal Care Date: 2021-11-30
Authors: John T Wilkinson; Jordan W Clawson; Chelsea M Allen; Angela P Presson; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 2.230