Literature DB >> 28599685

Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonoelastography in the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Cancer Compared to Histopathology as a Gold Standard.

Hina Rehman1, Saleem Raza2, Sadaf Aziz1, Asad Maqbool Ahmad3, Sadia Tahir4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe the diagnostic accuracy of elastography in detecting malignant breast lesion taking strain ratio of 4.8 and histopathology as gold standard. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, from March to September 2015.
METHODOLOGY: Atotal of 137 patients aged 20 to 60 years with clinically palpable breast lump of any size for at least one month duration were included in this study. Patients with purely cystic lesions and those on chemotherapy or hormonal therapy were excluded. Each patient was subjected to sonoelastography followed by ultrasound guided trucut biopsy. The strain ratio cut off value of 4.8 was used to differentiate benign from malignant lesion. Consultant histopathologist's report upon the biopsy specimens was obtained. Results of sonoelastography were compared with histopathology reports.
RESULTS: Mean age was 38.20 ±10.63 years. The size of the lesion ranged from 2.0 to 6.0 cm, a mean = 3.97 ±1.26 cm. The duration since the lump was noticed ranged from 12 weeks (3 months) to 20 weeks (5 months) with a mean of 15.09 ±2.56 weeks. Forty-one (29.9%) lesions were labelled malignant on sonoelastography while the actual number of malignant lesions was 35 (25.5%) on histopathology. When the results of sonoelastography were cross-tabulated with histopathology results, the number of TP(true positive), FN (false negative), FP(false positive) and TN (True negative) were 31, 4, 10 and 92 cases, respectively. It yielded 88.57% sensitivity, 90.20% specificity, 75.61% positive predictive value, 95.83% negative predictive value, 89.78% accuracy for sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant breast lesion taking histopathology as gold standard with an observed prevalence of malignant breast mass to be 25.55%.
CONCLUSION: Using a strain ratio of 4.8, sonoelastography was found to be 88.57% sensitive, 90.20% specific, and 89.78% accurate in the diagnosis of malignant breast masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28599685     DOI: 2609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  4 in total

1.  Ultrasound molecular imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant tumors in patients.

Authors:  Fei Yan; Zhuqing Song; Meng Du; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Further characterization of changes in axial strain elastograms due to the presence of slippery tumor boundaries.

Authors:  Christopher Uff; Leo Garcia; Jeremie Fromageau; Aabir Chakraborty; Neil Dorward; Jeffrey Bamber
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-05

3.  Value of Elastography in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions Keeping Histopathology as Gold Standard.

Authors:  Faryal Farooq; Syed Mubarak; Shaista Shaukat; Noman Khan; Kahkashan Jafar; Tariq Mahmood; Muhammad Arif Saeed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-08

4.  Determining the elastography strain ratio cut off value for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Musila Mutala; Gladys N Mwango; Angeline Aywak; Dania Cioni; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.