Literature DB >> 28599492

Histological evaluations of primary lesions are independently associated with prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Tomomitsu Tahara1, Tomoyuki Shibata1, Masaaki Okubo1, Dai Yoshida1, Tomohiko Kawamura1, Noriyuki Horiguchi1, Takamitsu Ishizuka1, Mitsuo Nagasaka1, Yoshihito Nakagawa1, Naoki Ohmiya1.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). To explore useful predictive factors for the response of advanced GC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor responses were assessed using computed tomography (CT) with histological based criteria. A total of 78 patients with advanced GC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. CT-based response assessment was performed following 2 courses of treatment. Histological evaluation of resected specimens was also performed according to the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Grade 1b, 2 and 3 (viable tumor cells remaining in <2/3 of the tumorous area) were defined as histological responders. The results were associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The majority of the cases underwent tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil based preoperative chemotherapy as the first line of treatment (n=76, 96%). A total of 25 (32%) and 29 (37%) cases were considered to be CT and histological responders, respectively. CT-based evaluation was not associated with OS or PFS, while histological evaluation was significantly associated with OS and PFS. Histological based evaluation was not associated with CT and GI X-ray or endoscopy-based evaluation of primary lesions. Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model demonstrated that histological non-response was an independent prognostic factor for predicting worse OS. Histological-based evaluation of primary lesions was independently associated with prognosis in patients with GC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; histological evaluation; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; overall survival progression-free survival

Year:  2017        PMID: 28599492      PMCID: PMC5453053          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  23 in total

1.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

2.  Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Heger; Franz Bader; Florian Lordick; Maria Burian; Rupert Langer; Martin Dobritz; Susanne Blank; Thomas Bruckner; Karen Becker; Ken Herrmann; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan: a standing position by comparing with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Takaki Yoshikawa; Yasushi Rino; Norio Yukawa; Takashi Oshima; Akira Tsuburaya; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging.

Authors:  W A Weber; K Ott; K Becker; H J Dittler; H Helmberger; N E Avril; G Meisetschläger; R Busch; J R Siewert; M Schwaiger; U Fink
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial.

Authors:  Wasaburo Koizumi; Hiroyuki Narahara; Takuo Hara; Akinori Takagane; Toshikazu Akiya; Masakazu Takagi; Kosei Miyashita; Takashi Nishizaki; Osamu Kobayashi; Wataru Takiyama; Yasushi Toh; Takashi Nagaie; Seiichi Takagi; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kimihiko Yanaoka; Hiroyuki Orita; Masahiro Takeuchi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Karen Becker; James D Mueller; Christoph Schulmacher; Katja Ott; Ulrich Fink; Raymonde Busch; Knut Böttcher; J Rüdiger Siewert; Heinz Höfler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Meta-analysis of the REAL-2 and ML17032 trials: evaluating capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.

Authors:  A F C Okines; A R Norman; P McCloud; Y-K Kang; D Cunningham
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial.

Authors:  Florian Lordick; Katja Ott; Bernd-Joachim Krause; Wolfgang A Weber; Karen Becker; Hubert J Stein; Sylvie Lorenzen; Tibor Schuster; Hinrich Wieder; Ken Herrmann; Rainer Bredenkamp; Heinz Höfler; Ulrich Fink; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Jörg R Siewert
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Akira Tsuburaya; Naoki Nagata; Haruhiko Cho; Naoki Hirabayashi; Michiya Kobayashi; Hiroshi Kojima; Yasuhiro Munakata; Ryoji Fukushima; Yoichi Kameda; Tadakazu Shimoda; Koji Oba; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Histopathological Types and Distribution Characteristics of Gastric Mixed Tumors.

Authors:  Fang-Heng Zhu; Yang-Kun Wang; Jun-Ling Zhou; Nian-Long Meng; Yue Wang; Bo Jiang; Su-Nan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.