Literature DB >> 28599199

The haemodynamic effects of bolus versus slower infusion of intravenous crystalloid in healthy volunteers.

Ida F Ukor1, Andrew K Hilton2, Michael J Bailey3, Rinaldo Bellomo4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed to characterise the haemodynamic effect of 1L of IV normal saline (NS) administered as a rapid versus slow infusion on cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), systemic blood pressures, and carotid blood flow in six healthy volunteers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six healthy male volunteers aged 18-65years were randomized to receive 1L NS given over 30min or 120min. On a subsequent study session the alternate fluid regimen was administered. Haemodynamic data was gathered using a non-invasive finger arterial pressure monitor (Nexfin®), echocardiography and carotid duplex sonography. Time to micturition and urine volume was also assessed.
RESULTS: Compared to baseline, rapid infusion of 1L of saline over 30min produced a fall in Nexfin®-measured CO by 0.62L/min (p<0.001), whereas there was a marginal but significant increase during infusion of 1L NS over 120min of 0.02L/min (p<0.001). This effect was mirrored by changes in HR and blood pressure (BP) (p<0.001). There were no significant changes in carotid blood flow, time to micturition, or urine volume produced.
CONCLUSIONS: Slower infusion of 1L NS in healthy male volunteers produced a greater increase in CO, HR and BP than rapid infusion. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Fluid therapy; Haemodynamics; Healthy volunteers; Noninvasive monitoring; Resuscitation; Saline

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28599199     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  4 in total

1.  Effect of Slower vs Faster Intravenous Fluid Bolus Rates on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fernando G Zampieri; Flávia R Machado; Rodrigo S Biondi; Flávio G R Freitas; Viviane C Veiga; Rodrigo C Figueiredo; Wilson J Lovato; Cristina P Amêndola; Murillo S C Assunção; Ary Serpa-Neto; Jorge L R Paranhos; José Andrade; Michele M G Godoy; Edson Romano; Felipe Dal Pizzol; Emerson B Silva; Miqueias M L Silva; Miriam C V Machado; Luiz Marcelo S Malbouisson; Airton L O Manoel; Marlus M Thompson; Lanese M Figueiredo; Rafael M Soares; Tamiris A Miranda; Lucas M de Lima; Eliana V Santucci; Thiago D Corrêa; Luciano C P Azevedo; John A Kellum; Lucas P Damiani; Nilton B Silva; Alexandre B Cavalcanti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Impact of Intravenous Fluid Challenge Infusion Time on Macrocirculation and Endothelial Glycocalyx in Surgical and Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Jiri Pouska; Vaclav Tegl; David Astapenko; Vladimir Cerny; Christian Lehmann; Jan Benes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The effects of a limited infusion rate of fluid in the early resuscitation of sepsis on glycocalyx shedding measured by plasma syndecan-1: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jutamas Saoraya; Lipda Wongsamita; Nattachai Srisawat; Khrongwong Musikatavorn
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-01-05

4.  Effect of a fluid bolus on cardiovascular collapse among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation (PrePARE): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David R Janz; Jonathan D Casey; Matthew W Semler; Derek W Russell; James Dargin; Derek J Vonderhaar; Kevin M Dischert; Jason R West; Susan Stempek; Joanne Wozniak; Nicholas Caputo; Brent E Heideman; Aline N Zouk; Swati Gulati; William S Stigler; Itay Bentov; Aaron M Joffe; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 30.700

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.