| Literature DB >> 28598541 |
Harriet Sommer1, Martin Wolkewitz1, Martin Schumacher1.
Abstract
A variety of primary endpoints are used in clinical trials treating patients with severe infectious diseases, and existing guidelines do not provide a consistent recommendation. We propose to study simultaneously two primary endpoints, cure and death, in a comprehensive multistate cure-death model as starting point for a treatment comparison. This technique enables us to study the temporal dynamic of the patient-relevant probability to be cured and alive. We describe and compare traditional and innovative methods suitable for a treatment comparison based on this model. Traditional analyses using risk differences focus on one prespecified timepoint only. A restricted logrank-based test of treatment effect is sensitive to ordered categories of responses and integrates information on duration of response. The pseudo-value regression provides a direct regression model for examination of treatment effect via difference in transition probabilities. Applied to a topical real data example and simulation scenarios, we demonstrate advantages and limitations and provide an insight into how these methods can handle different kinds of treatment imbalances. The cure-death model provides a suitable framework to gain a better understanding of how a new treatment influences the time-dynamic cure and death process. This might help the future planning of randomised clinical trials, sample size calculations, and data analyses.Entities:
Keywords: RCT design; antimicrobial resistance; competing risks; endpoint choice; multistate models; pseudo-value regression
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28598541 DOI: 10.1002/pst.1809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Stat ISSN: 1539-1604 Impact factor: 1.894