Literature DB >> 28598530

The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.

Mi-Young Song1, Hongseok An2, Eun-Jin Park3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of temporary cement cleaning methods on the retention of cemented crowns using zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty titanium specimens were fabricated to simulate prepared molars with minimally retentive taper. The Ni-Cr cast crowns were fabricated, temporarily cemented, and separated. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the temporary cement cleaning method (n = 10) as follows: control group (no temporary cementation), orange solvent group, ultrasonic cleaning group, and air-abrasion group. After the cleaning procedures, the specimens were cemented with definitive cements (zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer, RMGI, cement) and subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5-55°C, dwell time, 10 seconds). The tensile bond strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine, and the results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: When cemented with zinc phosphate cement, the statistical analysis showed that the value of the air-abrasion group was significantly higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference among the other groups. When cemented with RMGI cement, the air-abrasion group showed the lowest value, and the control group showed the highest value (p < 0.01). The difference between the ultrasonic cleaning group and the orange solvent group was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The use of temporary cement did not have a significant influence on retention of permanently cemented crowns when zinc phosphate cement was used for permanent cementation. Airborne-particle abrasion after provisional cementation improved retention of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement; however, the use of temporary cement significantly decreased retention of permanently cemented crowns when RMGI cement was used regardless of the temporary cement cleaning method.
© 2017 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleaning method; crown retention; temporary cement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28598530     DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  2 in total

1.  Application of Semipermanent Cements and Conventional Cement with Modified Cementing Technique in Dental Implantology.

Authors:  Valentina Veselinović; Saša Marin; Zoran Tatić; Nataša Trtić; Olivera Dolić; Tijana Adamović; Radmila Arbutina; Miodrag Šćepanović; Aleksandar Todorović
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2021-12

2.  The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant-supported metal copings: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mohammad Jowkar; Amin Davoudi; Amirhossein Fathi; Mohsen Ziaei; Einar Berg
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-05-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.