Literature DB >> 28598251

Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Australian Animals and Veterinarians.

Kate A Worthing1, Sam Abraham2, Stanley Pang2,3, Geoffrey W Coombs2,3, Sugiyono Saputra4,5, David Jordan6, Hui S Wong4, Rebecca J Abraham2,4, Darren J Trott4, Jacqueline M Norris1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the frequency and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Australian animals and whether animal-derived MRSA was similar to that from Australian veterinarians. A total of 1,080 clinical coagulase positive Staphylococcus isolates from Australian animals were collected during 2013. Sixteen (4%) of 360 S. aureus isolates were MRSA. Most MRSA came from companion animals, while none came from livestock. MRSA isolates were characterized using whole genome sequencing. ST22-IV (EMRSA-15) was the most common clone in dogs and cats. Clonal complex (CC) 8 was most common in horses. Most ST22-IV isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Animal-derived MRSA genomes were interrogated for the presence of host-specific genetic markers (staphylokinase gene [scn], chemotaxis-inhibiting proteins gene [chp], staphylococcal complement inhibitor gene [sak], enterotoxin A gene [sea], and Von Willebrand Factor binding protein gene [vwb]). A subset of MRSA genomes previously collected from Australian veterinarians was also interrogated. There was no clear pattern in the distribution of host-specific markers among animal and veterinarian isolates. Animal- and veterinarian-derived MRSA were intermingled in the phylogenetic tree. The absence of MRSA in Australian livestock is in stark contrast with its presence in livestock from other countries. Possible explanations include Australia's geographic isolation, the absence of live animal importation into Australia, and most notably, the restrictions placed on the use of antimicrobials of critical importance in Australian livestock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; antimicrobial resistance; veterinary microbiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28598251     DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Drug Resist        ISSN: 1076-6294            Impact factor:   3.431


  12 in total

1.  Molecular Epidemiology of Clinical and Colonizing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Isolates in Companion Animals.

Authors:  Hester Rynhoud; Brian M Forde; Scott A Beatson; Sam Abraham; Erika Meler; Ricardo J Soares Magalhães; Justine S Gibson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clonal Complex 398 as a Major MRSA Lineage in Dogs and Cats in Thailand.

Authors:  Surawit Chueahiran; Jitrapa Yindee; Pongthai Boonkham; Nipattra Suanpairintr; Pattrarat Chanchaithong
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-28

3.  Carriage of critically important antimicrobial resistant bacteria and zoonotic parasites amongst camp dogs in remote Western Australian indigenous communities.

Authors:  Bertha Rusdi; Tanya Laird; Rebecca Abraham; Amanda Ash; Ian D Robertson; Shewli Mukerji; Geoffrey W Coombs; Sam Abraham; Mark A O'Dea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Veterinary Students' Knowledge and Perceptions About Antimicrobial Stewardship and Biosecurity-A National Survey.

Authors:  Laura Hardefeldt; Torben Nielsen; Helen Crabb; James Gilkerson; Richard Squires; Jane Heller; Claire Sharp; Rowland Cobbold; Jacqueline Norris; Glenn Browning
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-18

5.  Factors influencing the behaviour and perceptions of Australian veterinarians towards antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Norris; Annie Zhuo; Merran Govendir; Samantha J Rowbotham; Maurizio Labbate; Chris Degeling; Gwendolyn L Gilbert; Dale Dominey-Howes; Michael P Ward
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A new transformation method with nanographene oxides of antisense carrying yycG RNA improved antibacterial properties on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm.

Authors:  Shizhou Wu; Yunjie Liu; Hui Zhang; Lei Lei
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST80 Clone: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Assia Mairi; Abdelaziz Touati; Jean-Philippe Lavigne
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Comparative genomics of MRSA strains from human and canine origins reveals similar virulence gene repertoire.

Authors:  Bruno Penna; Marcella B Silva; André E R Soares; Ana T R Vasconcelos; Mariana S Ramundo; Fabienne A Ferreira; Maria C Silva-Carvalho; Viviane S de Sousa; Renata F Rabello; Paula T Bandeira; Viviane S de Souza; Paul J Planet; Olney Vieira-da-Motta; Ana M N Botelho; Agnes M S Figueiredo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. Isolates From Healthy Pigs in Australia: Results of a Pilot National Survey.

Authors:  Amanda K Kidsley; Sam Abraham; Jan M Bell; Mark O'Dea; Tanya J Laird; David Jordan; Pat Mitchell; Christopher A McDevitt; Darren J Trott
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Burden and antimicrobial resistance of S. aureus in dairy farms in Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Alem Abrha Kalayu; Daniel Asrat Woldetsadik; Yimtubezinash Woldeamanuel; Shu-Hua Wang; Wondwossen A Gebreyes; Tadesse Teferi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.