Literature DB >> 28597736

Venous stenosis and occlusion in the presence of endocardial leads in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction.

Krzysztof Boczar1, Andrzej Zabek1, Kazimierz Haberka1, Maciej Debski1, Anna Rydlewska1, Robert Musial2, Jacek Lelakowski1,3, Barbara Malecka1,3.   

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of venous stenosis and occlusion (VSO) in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with regard to the indications for this treatment and to analyse the influence of VSO on efficacy, complications and technical challenges of TLE procedures. Methods The material consists of 133 consecutive TLE procedure records. The contrast venography examination of the ipsilateral access vein was performed prior to the operation. The whole study population was divided into two subgroups, based on the presence (subgroup I) or absence (subgroup II) of VSO. Results Phlebography was performed in 133 patients with age ranging from 25.7 to 86.1 years, 44 female (33.1%). The VSO was confirmed in 48 (36.1%) patients - subgroup I. Most of the patients were referred to TLE due to non-infectious reasons (100 pts-75.2%). The absence of VSO was observed substantially more frequently in patients with diabetes (P = 0.02). Procedural success rate reached 93.3% in subgroup I and 98.8% in subgroup II (P = 0.1). There was no significant difference in the use of advanced tools and alternative access sites. Conclusion The presence of VSO can be expected in one third of patients referred for lead extraction. There is no association between indication for TLE (infected or noninfected lead extraction) and the incidence of VSO. Diabetes proved to have a protective effect on venous patency in the previously mentioned group. VSO does not influence the effectiveness, safety, and the use of additional tools during TLE procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pacemaker; transvenous lead extraction; venography; venous occlusion; venous stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597736     DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1281545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cardiol        ISSN: 0001-5385            Impact factor:   1.718


  4 in total

1.  Implantable loop recorder as a strategy following cardiovascular implantable electronic device extraction without reimplantation.

Authors:  Antoinette Birs; Douglas Darden; Michael Eskander; Travis Pollema; Gordon Ho; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Severity and Extent of Lead-Related Venous Obstruction in More Than 3000 Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Marek Czajkowski; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Jarosław Kosior; Dorota Nowosielecka; Łukasz Tułecki; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  Are Endovascular Interventions for Central Vein Obstructions due to Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices Effective?

Authors:  Charalampos Sotiriadis; Stephanie Volpi; Pauline Douek; Amine Chouiter; Olivier Muller; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-07-30

4.  Assessment of Association Between Venous Occlusion and Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Andreas Keyser; Carsten Jungbauer; Janine Rennert; Birgit Linnemann; Christof Schmid; Simon Schopka
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.619

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.