Kashif Waqar Faiz1, Antje Sundseth2, Bente Thommessen2, Ole Morten Rønning3. 1. Nevroklinikken Akershus universitetssykehus og Helsetjenesteforskning Akershus universitetssykehus. 2. Nevroklinikken Akershus universitetssykehus. 3. Nevroklinikken Akershus universitetssykehus og Institutt for klinisk medisin Det medisinske fakultet Universitetet i Oslo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Too few patients with acute stroke receive thrombolytic therapy owing to the limited time window for treatment and prehospital delay. The purpose of this study is to describe the prehospital path for patients with acute stroke and, in particular, what distinguishes patients who contact the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) from those who contact their general practitioner (GP) or Out-of-hours (OOH) services. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients with acute cerebral infarction and intracerebral haemorrhage admitted to the Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, were included. Data on the prehospital path (prehospital delay, medical contacts) were collected over the period 15 April 2009 – 1 April 2010. RESULTS: A total of 299 patients were included in the study. The median age was 75 years and 48.5 % were women. In all, 63.9 % of patients with acute stroke called the EMCC, and 93.7 % of these were taken directly to hospital by ambulance. Of those who called the GP’s office or OOH services, 60.7 % were asked to go to the GP’s office or OOH services in person. Patients who called and attended the GP’s office or OOH services had milder neurological deficits (p < 0.001) and longer patient delay (p = 0.018) than those who called the EMCC. INTERPRETATION: Six out of ten patients who contacted the primary health care services were asked to go to the GP’s office/OOH services in person, which resulted in unnecessary delay. The findings from this study may indicate a need for specific training of this group of health care professionals in the prompt handling of patients with possible stroke.
BACKGROUND: Too few patients with acute stroke receive thrombolytic therapy owing to the limited time window for treatment and prehospital delay. The purpose of this study is to describe the prehospital path for patients with acute stroke and, in particular, what distinguishes patients who contact the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) from those who contact their general practitioner (GP) or Out-of-hours (OOH) services. MATERIAL AND METHOD:Patients with acute cerebral infarction and intracerebral haemorrhage admitted to the Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, were included. Data on the prehospital path (prehospital delay, medical contacts) were collected over the period 15 April 2009 – 1 April 2010. RESULTS: A total of 299 patients were included in the study. The median age was 75 years and 48.5 % were women. In all, 63.9 % of patients with acute stroke called the EMCC, and 93.7 % of these were taken directly to hospital by ambulance. Of those who called the GP’s office or OOH services, 60.7 % were asked to go to the GP’s office or OOH services in person. Patients who called and attended the GP’s office or OOH services had milder neurological deficits (p < 0.001) and longer patient delay (p = 0.018) than those who called the EMCC. INTERPRETATION: Six out of ten patients who contacted the primary health care services were asked to go to the GP’s office/OOH services in person, which resulted in unnecessary delay. The findings from this study may indicate a need for specific training of this group of health care professionals in the prompt handling of patients with possible stroke.
Authors: T Truc My Nguyen; Nyika D Kruyt; Jorien G J Pierik; Carine J M Doggen; Peter van der Lugt; Saager A V Ramessersing; Naomi T Wijers; Paul J A M Brouwers; Marieke J H Wermer; Heleen M den Hertog Journal: Acta Neurol Scand Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.209