Philipp Lutz1,2, Felix Goeser3,4, Dominik J Kaczmarek3,4, Stefan Schlabe3,4, Hans Dieter Nischalke3,4, Jacob Nattermann3,4, Achim Hoerauf5,4, Christian P Strassburg3,4, Ulrich Spengler3,4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. philipp.lutz@ukb.uni-bonn.de. 2. German Center for Infection Research, Bonn, Germany. philipp.lutz@ukb.uni-bonn.de. 3. Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. 4. German Center for Infection Research, Bonn, Germany. 5. Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Absolute polymorphonuclear (PMN) counts in ascites define spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), a severe form of bacterial infection in liver cirrhosis. Bacterascites, another form of ascites infection, can progress to SBP or may resolve spontaneously but is not reflected by absolute PMN counts. We investigated whether the relative ascites PMN count (the absolute PMN count divided by the absolute leukocyte count) provides additional information to detect bacterascites or predict SBP. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis requiring paracentesis were stratified with respect to a diagnosis of bacterascites and SBP with a prospective follow-up for 1 year. Diagnostic power of relative PMN counts in ascites was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS: At inclusion, we observed 28/269 (10%) and 43/269 (16%) episodes of BA and SBP, respectively. Unlike absolute PMN counts, relative PMN counts in ascites were significantly elevated in bacterascites (p = 0.001). During follow-up, 16 and 30 further episodes of BA and SBP were detected, respectively. Relative PMN counts increased significantly once patients developed BA (p = 0.001). At a threshold of 0.20 for the relative PMN count, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for bacterascites which required antibiotic treatment were 83, 75, 26 and 98%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a relative PMN count in ascites ≥0.13 and MELD score >17 was independent factors associated with occurrence of SBP during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The relative PMN count is a cheap immunological marker linked to bacterascites and future SBP, which may help to stratify patients according to their risk of infection.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Absolute polymorphonuclear (PMN) counts in ascites define spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), a severe form of bacterial infection in liver cirrhosis. Bacterascites, another form of ascites infection, can progress to SBP or may resolve spontaneously but is not reflected by absolute PMN counts. We investigated whether the relative ascites PMN count (the absolute PMN count divided by the absolute leukocyte count) provides additional information to detect bacterascites or predict SBP. METHODS: Hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis requiring paracentesis were stratified with respect to a diagnosis of bacterascites and SBP with a prospective follow-up for 1 year. Diagnostic power of relative PMN counts in ascites was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS: At inclusion, we observed 28/269 (10%) and 43/269 (16%) episodes of BA and SBP, respectively. Unlike absolute PMN counts, relative PMN counts in ascites were significantly elevated in bacterascites (p = 0.001). During follow-up, 16 and 30 further episodes of BA and SBP were detected, respectively. Relative PMN counts increased significantly once patients developed BA (p = 0.001). At a threshold of 0.20 for the relative PMN count, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for bacterascites which required antibiotic treatment were 83, 75, 26 and 98%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a relative PMN count in ascites ≥0.13 and MELD score >17 was independent factors associated with occurrence of SBP during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The relative PMN count is a cheap immunological marker linked to bacterascites and future SBP, which may help to stratify patients according to their risk of infection.
Authors: Tony Bruns; Philipp A Reuken; Sven Stengel; Ludmila Gerber; Beate Appenrodt; Johannes H Schade; Frank Lammert; Stefan Zeuzem; Andreas Stallmach Journal: Liver Int Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: John J Kim; Michelle M Tsukamoto; Arvind K Mathur; Yashar M Ghomri; Linda A Hou; Sarah Sheibani; Bruce A Runyon Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: David F Gaieski; Mark E Mikkelsen; Roger A Band; Jesse M Pines; Richard Massone; Frances F Furia; Frances S Shofer; Munish Goyal Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Philipp Lutz; Benjamin Krämer; Dominik J Kaczmarek; Marc P Hübner; Bettina Langhans; Beate Appenrodt; Frank Lammert; Jacob Nattermann; Achim Hoerauf; Christian P Strassburg; Ulrich Spengler; Hans Dieter Nischalke Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: Benedikt Simbrunner; Annika Röthenbacher; Helmuth Haslacher; David Bauer; David Chromy; Theresa Bucsics; Philipp Schwabl; Rafael Paternostro; Bernhard Scheiner; Michael Trauner; Mattias Mandorfer; Ilse Schwarzinger; Thomas Reiberger Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Isanka U Ratnasekera; Amy Johnson; Elizabeth E Powell; Andrew Henderson; Katharine M Irvine; Patricia C Valery Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Camila Alvarez-Silva; Robert Schierwagen; Alessandra Pohlmann; Fernando Magdaleno; Frank E Uschner; Patrick Ryan; Maria J G T Vehreschild; Joan Claria; Eicke Latz; Benjamin Lelouvier; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Jonel Trebicka Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 7.561