INTRODUCTION: The role of atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates is unclear in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) that recurs after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We hypothesized that patients with recurrent post-ablation (redo) PAF despite PVI have electrical substrates marked by rotors and focal sources, and structural substrates that resemble persistent AF more than patients with (de novo) PAF at first ablation. METHODS: In 175 patients at 11 centers, we compared AF substrates in both atria using 64 pole-basket catheters and phase mapping, and indices of anatomical remodeling between patients with de novo or redo PAF and first ablation for persistent AF. RESULTS: Sources were seen in all patients. More patients with de novo PAF (78.0%) had sources near PVs than patients with redo PAF (47.4%, p=0.005) or persistent AF (46.9%, p=0.001). The total number of sources per patient (p=0.444), and number of non-PV sources (p=0.701) were similar between groups, indicating that redo PAF patients had residual non-PV sources after elimination of PV sources by prior PVI. Structurally, left atrial size did not separate de novo from redo PAF (49.5±9.5 vs. 49.0±7.1mm, p=0.956) but was larger in patients with persistent AF (55.2±8.4mm, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with paroxysmal AF despite prior PVI show electrical substrates that resemble persistent AF more closely than patients with paroxysmal AF at first ablation. Notably, these subgroups of paroxysmal AF are indistinguishable by structural indices. These data motivate studies of trigger versus substrate mechanisms for patients with recurrent paroxysmal AF after PVI.
INTRODUCTION: The role of atrial fibrillation (AF) substrates is unclear in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) that recurs after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We hypothesized that patients with recurrent post-ablation (redo) PAF despite PVI have electrical substrates marked by rotors and focal sources, and structural substrates that resemble persistent AF more than patients with (de novo) PAF at first ablation. METHODS: In 175 patients at 11 centers, we compared AF substrates in both atria using 64 pole-basket catheters and phase mapping, and indices of anatomical remodeling between patients with de novo or redo PAF and first ablation for persistent AF. RESULTS: Sources were seen in all patients. More patients with de novo PAF (78.0%) had sources near PVs than patients with redo PAF (47.4%, p=0.005) or persistent AF (46.9%, p=0.001). The total number of sources per patient (p=0.444), and number of non-PV sources (p=0.701) were similar between groups, indicating that redo PAF patients had residual non-PV sources after elimination of PV sources by prior PVI. Structurally, left atrial size did not separate de novo from redo PAF (49.5±9.5 vs. 49.0±7.1mm, p=0.956) but was larger in patients with persistent AF (55.2±8.4mm, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with paroxysmal AF despite prior PVI show electrical substrates that resemble persistent AF more closely than patients with paroxysmal AF at first ablation. Notably, these subgroups of paroxysmal AF are indistinguishable by structural indices. These data motivate studies of trigger versus substrate mechanisms for patients with recurrent paroxysmal AF after PVI.
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; Michael R Franz; Paul Clopton; Etienne J Pruvot; David E Krummen Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Brian J Hansen; Jichao Zhao; Thomas A Csepe; Brandon T Moore; Ning Li; Laura A Jayne; Anuradha Kalyanasundaram; Praise Lim; Anna Bratasz; Kimerly A Powell; Orlando P Simonetti; Robert S D Higgins; Ahmet Kilic; Peter J Mohler; Paul M L Janssen; Raul Weiss; John D Hummel; Vadim V Fedorov Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; Matthew Wright; Nicolas Derval; Amir Jadidi; Andrei Forclaz; Isabelle Nault; Shinsuke Miyazaki; Frédéric Sacher; Pierre Bordachar; Jacques Clémenty; Pierre Jaïs; Michel Haïssaguerre; Mélèze Hocini Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Srinivas R Dukkipati; Frank Cuoco; Ilana Kutinsky; Arash Aryana; Tristram D Bahnson; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Ian Woollett; Ziad F Issa; Andrea Natale; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; David E Krummen; Paul Clopton; Kalyanam Shivkumar; John M Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Karl-Heinz Kuck; Josep Brugada; Alexander Fürnkranz; Andreas Metzner; Feifan Ouyang; K R Julian Chun; Arif Elvan; Thomas Arentz; Kurt Bestehorn; Stuart J Pocock; Jean-Paul Albenque; Claudio Tondo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert S Oakes; Troy J Badger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Eric N Fish; Joshua J E Blauer; Swati N Rao; Edward V R DiBella; Nathan M Segerson; Marcos Daccarett; Jessiciah Windfelder; Christopher J McGann; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Miguel Rodrigo; Andreu M Climent; Ismael Hernández-Romero; Alejandro Liberos; Tina Baykaner; Albert J Rogers; Mahmood Alhusseini; Paul J Wang; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Maria S Guillem; Sanjiv M Narayan; Felipe Atienza Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-02-13
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; Mohan N Vishwanathan; Christopher A B Kowalewski; Tina Baykaner; Miguel Rodrigo; Junaid A B Zaman; Paul J Wang Journal: Rev Port Cardiol Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 1.374
Authors: Mahmood Alhusseini; David Vidmar; Gabriela L Meckler; Christopher A Kowalewski; Fatemah Shenasa; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan; Wouter-Jan Rappel Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2017-03-20
Authors: Tina Baykaner; Theodoros A Zografos; Junaid A B Zaman; Ioannis Pantos; Mahmood Alhusseini; Rachita Navara; David E Krummen; Sanjiv M Narayan; Demosthenes G Katritsis Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Graham Peigh; Jeremiah Wasserlauf; Rachel M Kaplan; Ansel P Amaral; Amar Trivedi; Alexandru B Chicos; Rishi Arora; Susan Kim; Albert Lin; Nishant Verma; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 2.942