Literature DB >> 28596687

Relationship between use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and irritable bowel syndrome: A population-based cohort study.

Wan-Tzu Lin1, Yi-Jun Liao1, Yen-Chun Peng1, Chung-Hsin Chang1, Ching-Heng Lin1, Hong-Zen Yeh1, Chi-Sen Chang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the relationship between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use and the subsequent development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
METHODS: This retrospective, observational, population-based cohort study collected data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 19653 patients newly using SSRIs and 78612 patients not using SSRIs, matched by age and sex at a ratio of 1:4, were enrolled in the study from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2010. The patients were followed until IBS diagnosis, withdrawal from the National Health Insurance system, or the end of 2011. We analyzed the effects of SSRIs on the risk of subsequent IBS using Cox proportional hazards regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 236 patients in the SSRI cohort (incidence, 2.17/1000 person-years) and 478 patients in the comparison cohort (incidence, 1.04/1000 person-years) received a new diagnosis of IBS. The mean follow-up period from SSRI exposure to IBS diagnosis was 2.05 years. The incidence of IBS increased with advancing age. Patients with anxiety disorders had a significantly increased adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of IBS (aHR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.11-1.59, P = 0.002). After adjusting for sex, age, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, the use of anti-psychotics and other comorbidities, the overall aHR in the SSRI cohort compared with that in the comparison cohort was 1.74 (95%CI: 1.44-2.10; P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of IBS was higher in the SSRI cohort than in the non-SSRI cohort (log-rank test, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: SSRI users show an increased risk of subsequent diagnosis of IBS in Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain-gut axis; Irritable bowel syndrome; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28596687      PMCID: PMC5442087          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i19.3513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


Core tip: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) users were associated with a risk of subsequently diagnosed irritable bowel syndrome. The brain-gut axis may play a key role in this relationship. In clinical practice, physicians should pay attention to the gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with psychiatric disorders and SSRI use.

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressants are among the most widely used medications in clinical practice for the treatment of depressive disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and numerous other psychiatric diseases[1,2]. Among the many classes of antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed because of their effectiveness in treating many psychiatric disorders. SSRIs are safer and have a more favorable side-effect profile than the previous generations of antidepressants[3]. However, numerous studies have indicated that short-term use of SSRIs can cause many adverse side effects, including nausea, diarrhea and unstable mood swings. Additionally, suicide attempts, gastrointestinal bleeding, sexual dysfunction, and hyponatremia may occur during long-term use[4-6]. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is part of a large group of functional gastrointestinal disorders that are characterized by recurrent abdominal discomfort or pain and disturbed defecation in the absence of organic disease[7,8]. IBS is one of the most commonly treated diseases by primary care physicians as well as gastroenterologists. The prevalence of IBS is estimated to be 7.5%-21% worldwide[9,10]. IBS is a functional disorder and has no contribution towards mortality[11]; however, it is chronic and significantly reduces patients’ quality of life[9,12,13]. The suggested treatments for IBS include antispasmodics, antidiarrheal agents, laxatives, prokinetics, probiotics, anxiolytics, SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), 5-HT3 antagonists, cGMA agonists, and antibiotics according to each patient’s clinical symptoms[14,15]. However, there is no universally accepted or recommended therapy that effectively cures this disease. The pathophysiology of IBS is believed to be associated with abnormal gastrointestinal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, low-grade inflammation, stress and brain-gut interactions[9,16]. Additionally, a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with IBS, in particular anxiety and depressive disorders, has been reported in previous studies[16,17]. Antidepressants are often used to treat a variety of functional bowel disorders. Tricyclic antidepressants have been proven to offer statistically significant control of IBS symptoms in a previous meta-analysis[18,19]. Additionally, several randomized controlled trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of fluoxetine, citalopram and paroxetine for the treatment of IBS[20-23]. However, the evidence regarding the effectiveness of SSRIs in providing symptom relief in IBS is inconsistent. The American Gastroenterological Association Institute guidelines advise against using SSRIs for patients with IBS, based on the lack of improvement in global relief of symptoms identified in pooled estimates of five randomized control trials[24]. The present study aimed to explore the relationship of SSRIs with the subsequent development of IBS using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data source

The database used in our study was the NHIRD of Taiwan. The National Health Insurance (NHI) program in Taiwan was initiated in 1995 and enrolled over 24 million people by the end of 2014, representing 99% of the population in Taiwan. In the present study, data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) 2000 were analyzed. The LHID 2000 is a subset of the NHIRD that contains data from 1000000 randomly sampled patients, which is approximately 5% of the Taiwan’s general population. We conducted a retrospective observational study on the correlation of SSRIs with and their possible influence on IBS. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (IRB number: CE13152B-3), and because the data were obtained from the LHID 2000, informed consent from the participants was not obtained. The IRB specifically waived the requirement for consent.

Study population

We extracted data from the LHID 2000 for this retrospective study. Patients with a more than two-month medical prescription for an SSRI during one year between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were selected. The prescribed SSRIs included fluoxetine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine and escitalopram. We excluded any patients who were diagnosed with IBS (ICD-9-CM code: 564.1) prior to medical treatment with SSRIs. The comparison cohort included patients without any medical history of SSRI use who were frequency-matched with the SSRI cohort by age, sex, index date and year at a ratio of 1:4 (Figure 1). To ensure the validity of the diagnosis, we included only patients who were diagnosed with IBS (ICD-9-CM code: 564.1) in more than three outpatient visits or more than one inpatient hospitalization. The included patients taking SSRIs were regularly followed at the database for at least three outpatient visits. Thus, we supposed that these patients needed these medication, and had compliance in medication.
Figure 1

Flowchart of study design. IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome; LHID: Longitudinal Health Insurance Database; SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

Flowchart of study design. IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome; LHID: Longitudinal Health Insurance Database; SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. In addition, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (ICD-9:555, 556) were excluded because some of these patients exhibit symptoms similar to those of IBS during the inactive or remission stage of inflammatory bowel syndrome[25-29]. Additionally, patients with a diagnosis of infectious enterocolitis (ICD 9: 0078,0079, 0080-0088, 0090-0093, 558, 0030, 0062, 11285) within three months prior to the diagnosis of IBS were excluded due to the potentially increased risk of post-infectious IBS associated with bacterial, protozoan, helminth, or viral infections, all of which have been reported[30-34]. The main outcome was the incidence of newly diagnosed IBS during the follow-up period, which was estimated as the duration from the index date until IBS, withdrawal from the insurance system, or the end of study in 2011. Furthermore, common comorbidities diagnosed before enrollment in this study, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, colorectal cancer, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and posttraumatic disorder, were compared between the SSRI and comparison cohorts.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, United States). The distributions of SSRI exposure based on subject’s age, gender and clinical comorbidities were examined using χ2 tests for categorical variables. In the cohort study, multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the relationship between exposure to SSRI and the diagnosis of IBS, after adjusting for age, gender and medical comorbidities. All statistical tests were two-sided, conducted at a significance level of 0.05, and reported using P values and/or 95%CIs.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of study subjects

The eligible study participants included 19653 patients in the SSRI cohort and 78612 persons in the comparison cohort, with a similar age and sex distribution (Figure 1 and Table 1). Males represented 41.5% and females 58.5% of the entire study population. The mean follow-up time in the present study was 5.9 ± 3.0 years in the non-SSRI cohort and 5.5 ± 3.2 years in the SSRI cohort. The mean follow-up period of SSRI exposure to IBS diagnosis was 2.05 years. The majority of psychiatric disorders leading to a prescription of SSRI included anxiety (48.2%) and major depressive disorders (21.8%). There was more concomitant anti-psychotic usage in the SSRI cohort than in the non-SSRI group. However, most participants in both groups did not use anti-psychotics.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor cohort and the non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor cohort, 2000-2010 n (%)

VariableSSRI use
P value
No (n = 78612)Yes (n = 19653)
Sex1.000
Female45984 (58.5)11496 (58.5)
Male32628 (41.5)8157 (41.5)
Age, yr1.000
< 205548 (7.1)1387 (7.1)
20-2911592 (14.8)2898 (14.8)
30-3914312 (18.2)3578 (18.2)
40-4915112 (19.2)3778 (19.2)
50-5911720 (14.9)2930 (14.9)
≥ 6020328 (25.9)5082 (25.9)
Urbanization1< 0.001
124102 (31.3)6275 (32.7)
223134 (30.0)5851 (30.5)
312486 (16.2)2827 (14.7)
417325 (22.5)4228 (22.0)
Family income (NTD)< 0.001
013932 (17.7)3411 (17.4)
1-1584014871 (18.9)4807 (24.5)
15841-2880033687 (42.9)7915 (40.3)
28801-4580010243 (13.0)2173 (11.1)
≥ 458015874 (7.5)1346 (6.9)
Area< 0.001
North39708 (50.6)10001 (51.0)
Midland14067 (17.9)3265 (16.7)
South22823 (29.1)5642 (28.8)
East1837 (2.3)690 (3.5)
Occupation< 0.001
Public and military5735 (8.2)1531 (8.8)
Industry23168 (33.3)5617 (32.3)
Business28266 (40.6)5841 (33.6)
Low income559 (0.8)385 (2.2)
Other and retired11898 (17.1)3994 (23.0)
Anti-psychotics< 0.001
No75615 (96.2)16022 (81.5)
Yes2997 (3.8)3631 (18.5)
Comorbidity
Diabetes mellitus8126 (10.3)3143 (16.0)< 0.001
Hypertension18319 (23.3)6726 (34.2)< 0.001
Hyperlipidemia11823 (15.0)4521 (23.0)< 0.001
Colorectal cancer290 (0.4)96 (0.5)0.017
Major depressive disorder770 (0.98)4274 (21.8)< 0.001
Anxiety disorder10007 (12.7)9477 (48.2)< 0.001
Bipolar disorder130 (0.2)273 (1.4)< 0.001
Posttraumatic stress disorder7 (0.0)101 (0.5)< 0.001
Eating disorder26 (0.0)141 (0.7)< 0.001
Mean follow-up time (yr)5.86 ± 3.005.53 ± 3.21

Urbanization level: 1 indicates the highest level of urbanization and 4 the lowest. SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; NTD: New Taiwan dollars.

Baseline characteristics of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor cohort and the non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor cohort, 2000-2010 n (%) Urbanization level: 1 indicates the highest level of urbanization and 4 the lowest. SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; NTD: New Taiwan dollars. At the baseline, comorbid diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, colorectal cancer, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder were more prevalent in the SSRI cohort than in the comparison cohort.

Risk of IBS in SSRI users

A total of 236 patients in the SSRI cohort (incidence, 2.17/1000 person-years) and 478 patients in the comparison cohort (incidence, 1.04/1000 person-years) had a new diagnosis of IBS during the follow-up period (Table 2). The incidence of IBS increased with advancing age. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, colorectal cancer, and major depressive disorder did not influence the HR of IBS. However, patients with anxiety disorders had a significantly increased HR of IBS (HR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.11-1.59, P = 0.002). The use of anti-psychotics did not affect the incidence of IBS, whereas the use of SSRIs was associated with an increased HR of IBS.
Table 2

Comparisons of the incidence of irritable bowel syndrome by age, gender, comorbidity and drug use

VariableEventsPTRate1HR2(95%CI)P value
Sex
Female4143353631.231.00(reference)
Male3002336561.281.05(0.91-1.23)0.495
Age, yr
< 2013431390.301.00(reference)
20-2947914080.511.62(0.87-3.01)0.128
30-39931107210.842.52(1.40-4.55)0.002
40-491531131981.353.94(2.22-7.02)< 0.001
50-59133807521.654.56(2.54-8.17)< 0.001
≥ 602751298012.125.57(3.12-9.92)< 0.001
Comorbidity (yes vs no)
Diabetes mellitus113558582.020.93(0.74-1.17)0.549
Hypertension2691290732.081.06(0.87-1.28)0.576
Hyperlipidemia175843522.071.07(0.88-1.31)0.482
Colorectal cancer515273.271.48(0.61-3.58)0.386
Major depressive disorder67302922.211.19(0.90-1.57)0.217
Anxiety disorder220967352.271.33(1.11-1.59)0.002
Bipolar disorder524352.051.03(0.42-2.52)0.820
Anti-psychotics
No6305352641.181.00(reference)
Yes84337552.491.18(0.92-1.50)0.193
SSRIs
No4784603071.041.00(reference)
Yes2361087132.171.74(1.44-2.10)< 0.001

Per 1000 person-years;

Adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome; SSRIs: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Comparisons of the incidence of irritable bowel syndrome by age, gender, comorbidity and drug use Per 1000 person-years; Adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome; SSRIs: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Incident rate and HR of IBS associated with SSRI use in Cox regression analyses

After adjusting for sex, age and other comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and colorectal cancer, the overall adjusted HR (aHR) in the SSRI cohort compared with the comparison cohort was 1.74 (95%CI: 1.44-2.10; P < 0.001) using Cox regression analysis. The subgroup analysis showed that the aHR was higher in SSRI users than in non-SSRI users among females (aHR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.29-2.11), males (aHR = 1.85; 95%CI: 1.38-2.48) and individuals aged between 20 and 60 years (Table 3).
Table 3

Incidence rate and hazard ratio of irritable bowel syndrome associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in Cox regression analysis

SSRI use (2000-2010)
aHR2(95%CI)P value
No (n = 78612)
Yes (n = 19653)
EventPerson-yearsIncidence rate of IBS1EventPerson-yearsIncidence rate of IBS
Overall4784603071.042361087132.171.74(1.44-2.10)< 0.001
Sex
Female2822701951.04132651692.031.65(1.29-2.11)< 0.001
Male1961901121.03104435442.391.85(1.38-2.48)< 0.001
Age
< 208345750.23585640.581.12(0.23-5.41)0.884
20-2927735940.3720178151.122.78(1.36-5.70)0.005
30-3961893050.6832214161.491.95(1.13-3.34)0.016
40-4996912991.0557218992.601.79(1.19-2.69)0.005
50-5985652441.3048155083.102.17(1.40-3.36)< 0.001
≥ 602011062901.8974235113.151.32(0.97-1.79)0.077

per 1000 person-years;

aHR, adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome; SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

Incidence rate and hazard ratio of irritable bowel syndrome associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in Cox regression analysis per 1000 person-years; aHR, adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome; SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. The cumulative incidence of IBS was higher in the SSRI cohort than in the non-SSRI cohort (log-rank test, P < 0.001) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Comparison of the cumulative incidence of irritable bowel syndrome for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users and non-users. SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome.

Comparison of the cumulative incidence of irritable bowel syndrome for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users and non-users. SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; IBS: Irritable bowel syndrome.

HR of IBS associated with the duration of SSRI exposure

Table 4 shows the association between SSRI exposure days over one year and the HR of a subsequent diagnosis of IBS. The aHR was highest in individuals with a one-year SSRI exposure of less than 90 d (aHR = 3.27, 95%CI: 2.61-4.08). The aHR remained significantly higher in patients with longer durations of SSRI exposure.
Table 4

Hazard ratio of irritable bowel syndrome associated with duration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure over one year

aHR1(95%CI)P value
SSRI non-users1.00(reference)
SSRI exposure < 90 d3.27(2.61-4.08)< 0.001
SSRI exposure 90-180 d1.38(1.03-1.85)0.029
SSRI exposure 181-270 d1.49(1.05-2.13)0.027
SSRI exposure ≥ 270 d1.52(1.07-2.15)0.020

aHR, adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

Hazard ratio of irritable bowel syndrome associated with duration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure over one year aHR, adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. SSRI: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

Hazard ratio of IBS among SSRI and antidepressant users

A subgroup analysis of SSRI and non-SSRI users showed a significantly increased aHR of IBS in SSRI only users (aHR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.50-2.21, P < 0.001) but not in the users of other antidepressants only (aHR = 1.33, 95%CI: 0.75-2.36, P = 0.338) or the combined SSRI and other antidepressant users (aHR = 1.30, 95%CI: 0.84-2.01, P = 0.235) (Table 5).
Table 5

Hazard ratio of irritable bowel syndrome among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and antidepressant users

naHR1(95%CI)P value
Overall
Non-SSRIs773271.00(reference)
Non-SSRIs + other antidepressants12851.33(0.75-2.36)0.338
SSRIs + other antidepressants28721.30(0.84-2.01)0.235
SSRIs only167811.82(1.50-2.21)< 0.001

aHR, adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. SSRIs: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Hazard ratio of irritable bowel syndrome among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and antidepressant users aHR, adjusted by age, sex, urbanization, family income, area of residence, occupation, anti-psychotics and the comorbidities listed in Table 1. SSRIs: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

DISCUSSION

Based on our review of the literature, this is the first study using nationwide population database to investigate the relationship between SSRI prescriptions and IBS in Taiwan. Our results revealed that patients exposed to SSRIs had an increased risk of developing IBS (aHR = 1.74) after adjusting for sex, age, and major comorbidities. In this study, we demonstrated that IBS in SSRI users tended to occur in older patients. The incidence of IBS became higher as age increased in both SSRI users and non-users, and this finding conflict with both the global data and a previous questionnaire survey conducted in Taiwan[10,35]. A previous global meta-analysis and questionnaire study in Taiwan showed that the prevalence of IBS decreased with advancing age. However, the participants in the previous questionnaire study in Taiwan were healthy volunteers, and thus the prevalence of IBS in the Taiwan’s general population may have been underestimated. Additionally, IBS symptoms may occur at early ages with relatively benign symptoms. Most patients may tolerate these symptoms and not seek medical advice; this tendency may have also led to an underestimation of the incidence of IBS in young individuals. To evaluate the dose effect of SSRIs on the subsequent development of IBS, we analyzed the days of SSRI exposure within one year and determined the HR of subsequent IBS diagnosis. The aHR was highest in individuals with SSRI exposure for less than 90 d but remained significantly higher for patients with longer exposure times. Although SSRIs include widely used antidepressants that are more tolerable and have relatively benign adverse effects compared to TCAs or monoamine oxidase inhibitors[3], they continue to have some early onset adverse effects and problems associated with long-term treatment. The early onset adverse effects include gastrointestinal discomfort, nausea, dyspepsia and diarrhea and disappear within two to three weeks[5]. The higher HR of IBS in individuals with lower SSRI exposure times may be due to these early onset gastrointestinal side effects that lead to misdiagnosis of IBS by clinical physicians. However, Table 4 shows that patients with SSRI exposure for more than 90 d had a significantly higher HR of IBS, and this finding cannot be explained by the early gastrointestinal adverse effects of SSRIs. In addition, the mean follow-up time from SSRI exposure to IBS diagnosis was 2.05 years, which is long enough to exclude transient adverse effects of SSRIs. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that the long duration of psychiatric disorders leads to an increased risk of subsequent IBS. Many studies have identified a relationship between IBS and psychiatric disorders[17,36]. In patients with IBS who seek treatment, the rates of comorbid psychiatric disorders range from 54% to 94%[9,12]. Anxiety and depression disorders are associated with gastrointestinal symptoms in accordance with brain-gut interactions[37-40]. Additionally, the communication between the central nervous system and enteric nervous system appears to be bidirectional[36]. The biopsychological model of IBS suggests that deterioration of gastrointestinal symptoms could exacerbate anxiety and depression (bottom-up model) and that psychological factors themselves similarly influenced physiological factors (top-down model)[41]. Fond et al[17] demonstrated in a systematic review and meta-analysis that patients with IBS have significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression than healthy controls. To exclude the influence of other antidepressants, we performed a subgroup analysis of SSRI and non-SSRI users. Table 5 shows that the aHR was significantly higher in the users of SSRIs only compared with the users of non-SSRIs or users of combined SSRIs and other antidepressants. The use of other antidepressants only or in combination with SSRIs was not associated with an increased risk of IBS. One possible reason for the higher incidence of IBS in the SSRI cohort is that the patients’ underlying psychiatric disorders, particularly anxiety, may have deteriorated and thus their subclinical gastrointestinal symptoms became overt. Under these conditions, clinical physicians may provide new prescriptions for SSRIs, and patients may seek medical advice for IBS symptoms. This process is consistent with our study results, which showed that patients with anxiety disorders had a significantly higher HR of IBS. Poorly controlled anxiety disorders and unstable mood may exacerbate the symptoms of IBS. The increased HR of IBS in the SSRI cohort, compared with the comparison cohort in our study, may be due to the increased severity of anxiety disorders, poor compliance to SSRIs due to adverse medication effects or personal reasons. There were some limitations to our study. First, there is only one code for IBS (ICD-9-CM code: 564.1) in the ICD-9 system, and further subgroup analyses were therefore not feasible. Second, data on lifestyle factors, such as smoking and alcohol use, were not available in the NHIRD. Third, information on drug compliance was not obtained from this health care database. Fourth, the severity of any psychiatric disorder upon enrollment in the study was also not available in the NHIRD. Fifth, there are always coding issues in database studies. There may be registration differences among the physicians and psychiatrists who did not code for IBS and the gastroenterologists who did not code for depression/anxiety. However, most physicians should adhere to the proper coding standards due to NHI payment rules. In conclusion, SSRI use is associated with subsequently diagnosed IBS. In clinical practice, it is important to pay attention to the gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with psychiatric disorders who use SSRIs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the National Health Research Institute and the Bureau of National Health Insurance for providing the data for this study.

COMMENTS

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is part of a large group of functional gastrointestinal disorders that significantly reduce patients’ quality of life. Antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in particular, have been used to treat refractory IBS. The influence of SSRIs on the subsequent development of IBS remains unknown.

Research frontiers

The results regarding the clinical efficacy of SSRI in treating IBS are inconsistent. This study presents the first attempt to elucidate the relationship between SSRI use and subsequent diagnosis of IBS.

Innovations and breakthroughs

The overall adjusted hazard ratio was higher in the SSRI cohort than in the comparison cohort. The incidence of IBS in SSRI users increased with advancing age.

Applications

Physicians in clinical practice should pay attention to the gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with psychiatric disorders and SSRI use.

Terminology

IBS is characterized by recurrent abdominal discomfort or pain and disturbed defecation in the absence of an organic disease.

Peer-review

This study by Lin et al probes the relationship between SSRI use and the subsequent diagnosis of IBS over a 10-year span, using a national health insurance research database. The data indicate an adjusted increase in HR of 1.74 (P = 0.002) for the diagnosis of IBS in patients treated with SSRIs.
  40 in total

Review 1.  AGA technical review on irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Douglas A Drossman; Michael Camilleri; Emeran A Mayer; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Citalopram provides little or no benefit in nondepressed patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Annie Sharabidze; Theodore R Levin; Wei K Zhao; Elaine Chung; Peter Bacchetti; Chengshi Jin; Barbara Grimes; Craig J Pepin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 3.  American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the pharmacological management of irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Lin Chang; Anthony Lembo; Shahnaz Sultan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Altered neuro-endocrine-immune pathways in the irritable bowel syndrome: the top-down and the bottom-up model.

Authors:  Cristina Stasi; Massimo Rosselli; Massimo Bellini; Giacomo Laffi; Stefano Milani
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Irritable bowel syndrome: a little understood organic bowel disease?

Authors:  Nicholas J Talley; Robin Spiller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Bacillary dysentery as a causative factor of irritable bowel syndrome and its pathogenesis.

Authors:  L-H Wang; X-C Fang; G-Z Pan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  The cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy and paroxetine for severe irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Francis Creed; Lakshmi Fernandes; Elspeth Guthrie; Stephen Palmer; Joy Ratcliffe; Nicholas Read; Christine Rigby; David Thompson; Barbara Tomenson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Increased visceral sensitivity in Giardia-induced postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia. Effect of the 5HT3-antagonist ondansetron.

Authors:  V Dizdar; O H Gilja; T Hausken
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  Anxiety and depression comorbidities in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Fond; Anderson Loundou; Nora Hamdani; Wahid Boukouaci; Aroldo Dargel; José Oliveira; Matthieu Roger; Ryad Tamouza; Marion Leboyer; Laurent Boyer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 10.  The epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Caroline Canavan; Joe West; Timothy Card
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  1 in total

1.  Buspirone in the management of refractory irritable bowel syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Mustafa Abdul Karim; Nadeen Al-Baz; Peter M Haddad; Shuja M Reagu; Majid Alabdulla
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.